Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 66
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Problem with Steve's PLL circuit locking

Move Thread LAN_403
JjJ
Thu Jun 05 2008, 12:58AM Print
JjJ Registered Member #1519 Joined: Thu Jun 05 2008, 12:30AM
Location:
Posts: 1

Previously Steve Conner stated that when using his PLL circuit to build a Singing Tesla Coil, locking to the input from the function generator is a different problem from tunning the feedback from the Tesla Coil.
To let the PLL lock the function generator, we need an extra Resistor in series with the Capacitor in the loop filter.

I don't really understand why is it different?

The output from the Tesla Coil is a relatively nice sine wave as far as I have known.
Isn't it so for the function generator too (which generates nice sine wave too)?
The comparator compares the input with VCO's waveform and generate an output as square waveforms no matter what kind of input you put in, isn't it?
So why having an input from the function generator would be a different case to the one from Tesla Coil feedback?


And,
Which loop filter are we talking about (is it the one between the the comparator output and the input of VCO?)


Sorry for asking these stupid questions…
I'll be really appreciated if anyone could answer my questions

Thanks!


Steve's circuit is here:
Link2

Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Jun 05 2008, 09:54AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Unfortunately you'll need some knowledge of control theory and calculus to have any clue what I'm talking about, but I'll try anyway.

When tuning a Tesla coil, the output is always the same frequency as the input, because there is no other oscillator in the system than the VCO. A frequency change will take some time to propagate through the system because of the Q of the resonator, but it will always get there. It is impossible for the PLL to be out of lock in the classical sense that you might use when tuning up a radio receiver or whatever.

Hence, if we look at this as a "plant" in the terms of control theory, with its input being the VCO control voltage, and the output being the phase detector output voltage, the plant transfer function is a low-pass filter, whose break frequency depends on the resonator Q.

I can't remember if it's first-order or second-order, but it hardly matters. You can control this plant with an integrator, so my simple loop filter from the Mk1 works, and so does the op-amp integrator in my Mk2 driver.

Now, if we consider locking to a function generator, there are two oscillators that needn't be at the same frequency. A constant error in VCO control voltage will cause a ramp in the phase detector output, as the oscillators drift apart.

Therefore, the plant transfer function is now an integrator, and trying to use another integrator as the controller will violate the Nyquist criterion and make it unstable. The appropriate controller is now a lead-lag network (I think) or simply a proportional gain. So the Mk1 may or may not lock to a function generator, and the Mk2 certainly won't.

Sorry if you don't understand this, but I can't think of a simpler way to explain it. Maybe Richie can help :|
Back to top
Ken M.
Thu Jun 05 2008, 09:38PM
Ken M. Registered Member #618 Joined: Sat Mar 31 2007, 04:15AM
Location: Us-Great Lakes
Posts: 628
Uh Yea....took Calc and electronics in College and all I have to say to that explaination is @.@ dead
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.