Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Determining A Useful Transistor

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
quicksilver
Fri May 30 2008, 09:04PM Print
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
In the various common "Primary-Feedback" LOPT (flyback) drivers I have used a great amount of transistors and also downloaded all sorts of data sheets. I have tried to determine what is the common thread that makes for a "good transistor" in these type of drivers and I really can't find an answer. The 2N3055 seems like crap but then again I have seen a driver with two of them work very well. I have tried a 2N3773 and gotten much better results than a MJ13009 which was rater at much higher levels almost across the spectrum. What I am asking is what is the determinate factor? What makes one preform better than another?

Is this a systemic issue that also includes the level of resistors and value of the caps; so that depending on what is contained in the circuit - there is no clear cut answer for a "better transistor"?

I just recently got hold of a MJ15003! This is a monster with a 20A rating, Power dissipation of 250w & a Vceo of 140v but yet it preformed little better than a 2N3773. Could someone explain what I would look for & why in transistors for this type of driver circuit?

Thanks.
Back to top
Arcstarter
Fri May 30 2008, 09:33PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Gain probably has something to do with it(maybe it will help it turn full on with better gain) and more than likely resistance while on.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Fri May 30 2008, 09:37PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Firstly you should get a transistor with ca. <250V rating, this is because the higher voltage ones are made using different technique (epitaxial VS triple diffused IIRC) and have different parameters.

The parameters you are looking for in this circuit are current gain (Hfe), turn-off delay time (storage time) and fall time (and of course sufficient current and voltage rating, Vcb should be at least 5x supply voltage (approx.)).
A transistor with low Hfe, long Tdoff and Tfall is likely to get very hot or even fail to oscillate in the circuit (using homemade primary; this is the case of Horizontal Output Transistors or HOTs which are commonly used to drive the flyback in the TV, these will fail to work most of the times in the single transistor driver).
If you want part numbers, KD60x or KD50x works amazingly, they work maybe 2x better than 2N3055 and get only half as hot! Sadly it is impossible to obtain these today.

The MJ15003 would be my choice (if I didnt have the transistors listed above tongue), make sure you got an original one as these are often faked.

Another option to increase power is to simply parallel the transistors, they will not get as hot and you get more power. Don't worry about current sharing; it simply works.




Back to top
Antonio
Fri May 30 2008, 09:38PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
If you use the normal primary winding of the transformer, the transistor must be rated at 1500 V of maximum vce and several A of maximum current. This is the kind of transistor normally used in CRT devices. A diode of similar ratings across the transistor is a good idea. If you wind a new primary, the required voltage may be lower, but the current will be higher.
Back to top
quicksilver
Sat May 31 2008, 02:22PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
Thank you all so very much for your insight. Let me elaborate on what made me confused in the first place....There was a web page wherein a fellow elaborated on what made for a good transistor:
Link2

In it, he described the BU208A (and D) transistor which is a Horizontal Output type and upon looking them up I noticed that they showed a low base voltage and current. Check the NTE page:
Link2
It's listed as the NTE238: A Horizontal Output TO-3 type with VERY high Vcex...
Up until that point I was convinced that ALL parameters needed to be high as in a MJ15003 as it simply made sense due to my (mis)conception that I would always be dealing with higher voltages and current.
I also believed that they all needed to be simple specific switching transistors. Some say the Horizontal Output type are great / others do not share that idea....My own brief experience with them shows them to work but they appear delicate (but that's just one example that I tried).

Both his & your outlines made for a greater understanding of the dynamics of the transistor within the flyback driver elements. But brings up the most logical issue: If the parallel transistors work - -WHY the emphasis on a single? Why NOT leave those old but cheap two 2N3055's in place and be done with it?

Re: the MJ13009....it's performance was so dismal that I was almost sure what I received may have been faked! But it was from a reputable dealer....
Back to top
Arcstarter
Sat May 31 2008, 08:35PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Antonio wrote ...

If you use the normal primary winding of the transformer, the transistor must be rated at 1500 V of maximum vce and several A of maximum current. This is the kind of transistor normally used in CRT devices. A diode of similar ratings across the transistor is a good idea. If you wind a new primary, the required voltage may be lower, but the current will be higher.
That is not totally true. I use an irfp460 and the supply voltage is 50 volts and i use the primary winding. The mosfet has never died being run this way.

Do NOT use the horizontal output transistor(HOT) Which it the big high voltage transistor usually rated at 1200 or above(from what i have seen) and a few amps. They will not work for the single transistor design. Contact Dr. Monsterarc For the reason. He knows all about it.
Back to top
Spedy
Sat May 31 2008, 09:07PM
Spedy Registered Member #964 Joined: Wed Aug 22 2007, 12:39AM
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 134
Arcstarter wrote ...

Antonio wrote ...

If you use the normal primary winding of the transformer, the transistor must be rated at 1500 V of maximum vce and several A of maximum current. This is the kind of transistor normally used in CRT devices. A diode of similar ratings across the transistor is a good idea. If you wind a new primary, the required voltage may be lower, but the current will be higher.
That is not totally true. I use an irfp460 and the supply voltage is 50 volts and i use the primary winding. The mosfet has never died being run this way.

Do NOT use the horizontal output transistor(HOT) Which it the big high voltage transistor usually rated at 1200 or above(from what i have seen) and a few amps. They will not work for the single transistor design. Contact Dr. Monsterarc For the reason. He knows all about it.

Oh, that explains why my single-transistor didn;t work... Time to go get a stinking 2n3055 from radioshack..
Back to top
Antonio
Sat May 31 2008, 09:42PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
Arcstarter wrote ...

Antonio wrote ...

If you use the normal primary winding of the transformer, the transistor must be rated at 1500 V of maximum vce and several A of maximum current. This is the kind of transistor normally used in CRT devices. A diode of similar ratings across the transistor is a good idea. If you wind a new primary, the required voltage may be lower, but the current will be higher.
That is not totally true. I use an irfp460 and the supply voltage is 50 volts and i use the primary winding. The mosfet has never died being run this way.

Do NOT use the horizontal output transistor(HOT) Which it the big high voltage transistor usually rated at 1200 or above(from what i have seen) and a few amps. They will not work for the single transistor design. Contact Dr. Monsterarc For the reason. He knows all about it.

The irfp460 is a very robust MOSFET, almost impossible to destroy with a simple flyback driver. Not a bipolar transistor. But it may get hot due to the relatively low 500 V maximum voltage. It has an avalanche diode across it, rated to limit the voltage in a safe way. The horizontal output transistors may require some changes in the design of the driver, due to the quite low current gain and are not direct replacements for a 3055, that has a higher current gain (an insufficient maximum voltage). For a driver with a separated oscillator, they are the right transistors to use, since they are made for this purpose.
Back to top
quicksilver
Sun Jun 01 2008, 08:23PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
I set up a very unique experiment with the highest value transistor I have available to me - a MJ15003 and several others, a 2N3773, a MJE13009, and a C4433 (NTE2308). I used the standard "capacitor, diode loop" driver. The arcs were VERY nearly the same! The input was 15vdc 3A. I altered this to 19vdc 3A and saw minor increases, etc; but they all showed that level of increase.

It was when I started changing the values of the resistors that I saw differences. I even altered the first cap value from 4000+ uf to as low as 1000uf & THAT did not make as serious a difference as the resistance values.

My conclusions were (thus far) that it's the systemic design of the circuit and not the transistor, per se' that determines the arc intensity.

I have the materials to make a Mazelli driver but I have read that the input demands 10 amps! At THAT level I can see that there would be a substantial difference no matter the driver!
Back to top
Arcstarter
Sun Jun 01 2008, 08:42PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Antonio wrote ...

Arcstarter wrote ...

Antonio wrote ...

If you use the normal primary winding of the transformer, the transistor must be rated at 1500 V of maximum vce and several A of maximum current. This is the kind of transistor normally used in CRT devices. A diode of similar ratings across the transistor is a good idea. If you wind a new primary, the required voltage may be lower, but the current will be higher.
That is not totally true. I use an irfp460 and the supply voltage is 50 volts and i use the primary winding. The mosfet has never died being run this way.

Do NOT use the horizontal output transistor(HOT) Which it the big high voltage transistor usually rated at 1200 or above(from what i have seen) and a few amps. They will not work for the single transistor design. Contact Dr. Monsterarc For the reason. He knows all about it.

The irfp460 is a very robust MOSFET, almost impossible to destroy with a simple flyback driver. Not a bipolar transistor. But it may get hot due to the relatively low 500 V maximum voltage. It has an avalanche diode across it, rated to limit the voltage in a safe way. The horizontal output transistors may require some changes in the design of the driver, due to the quite low current gain and are not direct replacements for a 3055, that has a higher current gain (an insufficient maximum voltage). For a driver with a separated oscillator, they are the right transistors to use, since they are made for this purpose.
Yes, i see cheesey
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.