Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 58
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

MegaBrute CM600 gate driver

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Wirenut
Thu Apr 17 2008, 01:10AM Print
Wirenut Registered Member #141 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 01:14PM
Location: Southern California
Posts: 96
I have a few questions about cm600's and the megaBrute gate driver.

1. What is the maximum recommended frequency of the cm600? The max. current in DRSSTC use?

2. What happens if I exceed this frequency? Does it simply lose efficiency or does it reach a point where it won't switch any faster or does it explode?

3. Could I use a miniBrute resonant board to drive a halfbridge of cm600's (including the MegaBrute gate driver boards)?

4. Would I need to parallel the UCC gate drivers on the resonant board? Would any other modifications (to the resonant board) be necessary?

5. Would a gate drive transformer identical to the one used in the miniBrute work?

6. How is the value of R4 on the MegaBrute board determined?
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Apr 17 2008, 02:03AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
wrote ...

3. Could I use a miniBrute resonant board to drive a halfbridge of cm600's (including the MegaBrute gate driver boards)?
Yes

wrote ...

4. Would I need to parallel the UCC gate drivers on the resonant board? Would any other modifications (to the resonant board) be necessary?

No, you're only using the output of the miniBrute driver board as a signal input to the CM600 driver board.

wrote ...

5. Would a gate drive transformer identical to the one used in the miniBrute work?

That one could possibly work, however, it can probably be much smaller. But you will need to evaluate performance before applying power to CM600.
Remember, you're only passing signal, not high current.
wrote ...

6. How is the value of R4 on the MegaBrute board determined?
CM600 datasheet should provide all these details regarding series gate resistance selection, frequency of operation, etc...

Back to top
Austin
Tue Feb 03 2009, 06:40PM
Austin Registered Member #1169 Joined: Wed Dec 12 2007, 09:16AM
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 251
Is there any documentation on what the primary, secondary windings might look like along with the topload.

I'm assuming you can't use the primary winding from the minibrute considering the resonate frequency will change significantly?

Also where can I learn how to change the MMC, tank capacitors, Bleeder resistors, to accommodate the CM600. My knowledge of electronics is limited.
Back to top
Dr. Drone
Wed Feb 04 2009, 12:06AM
Dr. Drone Registered Member #290 Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 08:24PM
Location:
Posts: 1673
shades
Back to top
Tom540
Wed Feb 04 2009, 04:28AM
Tom540 Banned on 3/17/2009.
Registered Member #487 Joined: Sun Jul 09 2006, 01:22AM
Location:
Posts: 617
Chris,

Steve now uses GDT's driven with FETS to directly drive his bricks. I didn't actually think they could be driven at 100KHz, interesting.

-Tom
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Wed Feb 04 2009, 07:02PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
You should use a dedicated CM600 high-side gate driver.
I'm sure Steve has gotten his circuit to work with just FETs driving a gate transformer, but to ensure proper operation, a high-side driver is highly recommended.

Sure, maybe its a bit more work, but you're guaranteed to switch those CM600's every time. With a low-side driver, as Steve was doing, you are much more dependent on the transformer design being properly designed and tuned, which is also dependent on frequency of operation as well as duty cycle, pulsewidth, etc...

With a high-side driver, the transformer only passes a "signal", its not transferring power.

So use a high side driver for the CM600s.
Its the safest and most reliable bet out there.
Back to top
Tom540
Wed Feb 04 2009, 07:42PM
Tom540 Banned on 3/17/2009.
Registered Member #487 Joined: Sun Jul 09 2006, 01:22AM
Location:
Posts: 617
Safest and reliable? Hmm except when the power supply blows and all IGBT's turn on at once, lol. I think they both have their advantages and disadvantages. I might give both a try once I get to that point. Your drivers use the IXYS 18 amp fet drivers right?

-Tom
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Wed Feb 04 2009, 09:13PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Tom540 wrote ...

Safest and reliable? Hmm except when the power supply blows and all IGBT's turn on at once, lol. I think they both have their advantages and disadvantages. I might give both a try once I get to that point. Your drivers use the IXYS 18 amp fet drivers right?

-Tom

Which power supply?

If you design your drivers right, loss of power supply will NOT affect the gate of the CM600.
My particular drivers in fact use independent power supplies and also will not fail or latch up with loss of power.
Steve's high-side drivers are work in a similar fashion i believe.

The IXYS gate drivers also have a undervoltage lock-out, so when Vcc falls below a particular threshold, the device no longer turns on.

Also, CM600s are used by the bazillions in industry from everything from high power motor drives to high power inverters on locomotives. In alll instances, they are driven by dedicated high-side supplies.

Trust me, there is a reason for it.
Back to top
Tom540
Wed Feb 04 2009, 10:19PM
Tom540 Banned on 3/17/2009.
Registered Member #487 Joined: Sun Jul 09 2006, 01:22AM
Location:
Posts: 617
Dr. GigaVolt wrote ...

Tom540 wrote ...

Safest and reliable? Hmm except when the power supply blows and all IGBT's turn on at once, lol. I think they both have their advantages and disadvantages. I might give both a try once I get to that point. Your drivers use the IXYS 18 amp fet drivers right?

-Tom

Which power supply?

If you design your drivers right, loss of power supply will NOT affect the gate of the CM600.
My particular drivers in fact use independent power supplies and also will not fail or latch up with loss of power.
Steve's high-side drivers are work in a similar fashion i believe.

The IXYS gate drivers also have a undervoltage lock-out, so when Vcc falls below a particular threshold, the device no longer turns on.

Also, CM600s are used by the bazillions in industry from everything from high power motor drives to high power inverters on locomotives. In alll instances, they are driven by dedicated high-side supplies.

Trust me, there is a reason for it.

I thought Steve had a problem way back when his 120v fuse blew which was powering the gate drivers they latched on.Oh I completely agree with you on the industry. I've never seen them driven with a GDT alone but then again who drives them at 100KHz in the industry either? I'm not trying to argue just trying to get some more info behind why its done one way or another.

What I'm thinking is making a dedicated driver similar to yours and Steves using a dual gate driver chip 27425 and 2 n channel fets since that's what I have on hand. P channels are pretty scarce now.

-Tom
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Feb 05 2009, 12:59AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
The thing is that the CM600s are a hefty load. If you drive from the low side, you need to drive power through a transformer which needs to pass loads of current at very high bandwidth (fast rise / fall times) which can be quite difficult.
With a high-side driver, you're only sending a signal through the transformer (or optocoupler) and the power is all on the high side.

Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.