Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 77
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Fooling the power meter "legally"

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Mates
Mon Apr 14 2008, 07:49PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Dr. Shock wrote ...

wrote ...

No, I said I can send the output discharge through the breaker (or a fuse) and nothig will happened...Don't make me look like I'm stupid. I know very well that the loading current of the Marx is very small!

Do you really think a circuit breaker is going to be tripped by a single output pulse of a marx generator?

Apparently we do not understand each other. I'm the one claiming, that a fuse (or a breaker) connected in series with ultrashort pulse discharge of Marx generator WILL NOT cause any tripping (burning) response despite the amp peak can be many hundreds time bigger than what the breaker (or the fuse) is designed for...
Forget the fuse or breaker which is on the mains - that's not the one I'm talking about, I'm talking about a hypothetical breaker which stands on my table and is connected to the Marx HV output...
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Mon Apr 14 2008, 08:41PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
wrote ...

Apparently we do not understand each other. I'm the one claiming, that a fuse (or a breaker) connected in series with ultrashort pulse discharge of Marx generator WILL NOT cause any tripping (burning) response despite the amp peak can be many hundreds time bigger than what the breaker (or the fuse) is designed for...
Forget the fuse or breaker which is on the mains - that's not the one I'm talking about, I'm talking about a breaker which stands on my table connected to the Marx HV output...

Why anyone would connect a circuit breaker to your Marx HV output is beyond me . . .

. . . however it is quite clear you do lack the fundamental understanding of how a circuit breaker works in the first place.

Firstly, a circuit breaker is rated for only a few hundred volts. Your experiment is invalid from the get-go as your attempting to verify operation of a device WAAAAYYYY outside its intended
range of operation.

Secondly, most circuit breakers are thermal devices. When the bimetal strip inside them heat up, they will trip. Now, back to your Marx Generator. The discharge from a Marx Generator is a single
discharge, and unless your Marx Generator is VERY large, the discharge can be considered for all intenstive purposes, adiabatic. I'm sure if you discharged your marx into a small piece of wire, the wire
would not even be warm. Same with a circuit breaker.

Finally if you ran your Marx generator continously (say your 150kHz), and IF (thats a BIG BIG IF) it could withstand the voltage across the terminals from a Marx discharge, then yes, it would likely trip the breaker assuming the current (over time) is sufficient to trip it.
Back to top
Mates
Mon Apr 14 2008, 09:12PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Dr. Shock wrote ...

wrote ...

Apparently we do not understand each other. I'm the one claiming, that a fuse (or a breaker) connected in series with ultrashort pulse discharge of Marx generator WILL NOT cause any tripping (burning) response despite the amp peak can be many hundreds time bigger than what the breaker (or the fuse) is designed for...
Forget the fuse or breaker which is on the mains - that's not the one I'm talking about, I'm talking about a breaker which stands on my table connected to the Marx HV output...

Why anyone would connect a circuit breaker to your Marx HV output is beyond me . . .

. . . however it is quite clear you do lack the fundamental understanding of how a circuit breaker works in the first place.

Firstly, a circuit breaker is rated for only a few hundred volts. Your experiment is invalid from the get-go as your attempting to verify operation of a device WAAAAYYYY outside its intended
range of operation.

Secondly, most circuit breakers are thermal devices. When the bimetal strip inside them heat up, they will trip. Now, back to your Marx Generator. The discharge from a Marx Generator is a single
discharge, and unless your Marx Generator is VERY large, the discharge can be considered for all intenstive purposes, adiabatic. I'm sure if you discharged your marx into a small piece of wire, the wire
would not even be warm. Same with a circuit breaker.

Finally if you ran your Marx generator continously (say your 150kHz), and IF (thats a BIG BIG IF) it could withstand the voltage across the terminals from a Marx discharge, then yes, it would likely trip the breaker assuming the current (over time) is sufficient to trip it.


Oh my good Daniel! I'm saying exactly the same like you, but for some reason you don't understand my words.
So, let's make things absolutely clear: Very short pulse of a very high amp peak will not trip a breaker! That's what I'm claiming all the time and that's what the whole thread is about. Please read my previous posts carefully and you must see it. I came up with the Marx example to support exactly what you say not to deny it. In case I'm still not clear enough, please contact me over the internal mail, I’m afraid that people must be sick of the discussion we have here...
Back to top
TheMerovingian
Mon Apr 14 2008, 09:28PM
TheMerovingian Registered Member #14 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:04PM
Location: Prato/italy
Posts: 383
I think that all the power will gone wasted into resistive losses

A simple example

think the electrical grid as a 200mOhms equivalent resistance

you are pulling 300A 100us at 1%duty cycle (100 pulses per second) pulses at 250V, this means you are dropping 300*0.2 = 60V

so your load voltage will be 190V (not considering rectification, this is purely theoretical)

Total energy for each pulse: 7,5J, of which 5,7J are useful energy and 1,8J are wasted

Average power:
Total power: 750Watts
Power dissipation: 180Watts
Useful power: 570Watts
or 76% efficiency

the 24% of wasted energy is the energy you want to steal probably

I don't think that resistance of home and external grid is smaller than 200mOhms (my neighbour was using an arc welder, and i noticed that anytime the probe touched the piece my home lights dimmed noticeably)

Probably it will not trip the breaker, but it will totally screw up the grid, distorting the power factor (unless you sincronize your pulser with the 100Hz peak-to-peak rectified mains voltage)

And, I am not fooled, i think it is simply a waste of time.

Back to top
Mates
Mon Apr 14 2008, 10:26PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Please let's end up this thread as non-sense. I have no interest in building the device anymore since most of the arguments mentioned here are pretty persuasive and it would be only loss of time. Thanks for interesting discussion anyway.

Cheers Mates
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Tue Apr 15 2008, 12:20AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
wrote ...

Very short pulse of a very high amp peak will not trip a breaker! That's what I'm claiming all the time and that's what the whole thread is about.

No, ONE (1) single short pulse of a very high amp peak will not trip a breaker. This is different than your proposal which would have a continous series of very short pulses.
There is a difference. The (1) single short pulse can be considered adiabatic. However, the continous case (your proposal), the bimetal contacts in the circuit breaker would see a cumulative heating effect and trip the breaker.



Back to top
tesla500
Tue Apr 15 2008, 01:01AM
tesla500 Registered Member #347 Joined: Sat Mar 25 2006, 08:26AM
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 106
There is one way to do it, but only if you have current transformer metering (unless you have a 400A or above service, you almost certainly don't). If you set up some circuit that makes sure current always flows in one direction in the line, the transformer will saturate and not read any current. A simple diode won't work, it would allow the transformer core flux to reset during times of zero current.

The circuit would need to modulate the DC current draw so that during one half cycle the current is higher than the other half cycle, and then you will have net power flow, but the meter will not measure any power.

David
Back to top
Electra
Tue Apr 15 2008, 01:37PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156
A crazy Idea just occurred to me, if you look at this for just what it is, an aluminium disk on an almost frictionless bearing, (in an old type meter at least). Could it be made to rotate using a couple of A.C coils or electromagnets, in proximity to the case or around it? Clearly one coil needs to be fed with phase shifted voltage in respect to the other to create a rotating field effect.

Maybe just as an experiment, sit an old elect meter on a table to see if it can be made to spin round with no wires connected to it at all. Obviously this is assuming the case is not made of metal or there isn’t any internal shielding fitted.

I know this was not you asked at the start, and would have the opposite effect to making it slow down, but just a theoretical thought.
Back to top
Mates
Tue Apr 15 2008, 01:53PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Dr. Shock wrote ...

There is a difference. The (1) single short pulse can be considered adiabatic. However, the continous case (your proposal), the bimetal contacts in the circuit breaker would see a cumulative heating effect and trip the breaker.


Yes, you right, but I'm talking about 2KW of total power in the pulses. And the 20A breaker should stand over 4KW. So my device will not trip the breaker.I stand on this...
Back to top
Arcstarter
Tue Apr 15 2008, 03:36PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
quicksilver wrote ...

Realistically the concept of "Fooling the power meter legally" is a misnomer. No method of "fooling" the meter is legal. So in reality the concept is how to get away with it. Unfortunately a lot more motivated collection of people than would ever be thinking of how to get away with it, have been employed in how to retain the investment.

Bottom line is that theft is theft & steps are always taken to prevent theft from occurring.
How about "more energy efficient"?
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.