Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 110
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Running laminated transformers on higher frequencies

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Apr 12 2008, 04:18PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Is there any problem with running a laminated mains transformer above its operating frequency? I guess the core hysteresis loss will increase but will this be a problem? I have no idea about the core loss when operated at "designed" frequency but I can imagine that the copper loss dominates (provided you do not saturate the core).

What do you think?



Back to top
Lakeowner
Sat Apr 12 2008, 05:22PM
Lakeowner Registered Member #1370 Joined: Mon Mar 03 2008, 09:01AM
Location: Finland
Posts: 56
With enough low frequencies it may work (at AF), but you can't probably push lots of power through it. How high frequency did you imagine?
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Apr 12 2008, 05:29PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
For a 50Hz transformer, I meant something like 100-200Hz for 2x to 4x more power (voltage) from the same sized transformer.




Back to top
Lakeowner
Sat Apr 12 2008, 06:36PM
Lakeowner Registered Member #1370 Joined: Mon Mar 03 2008, 09:01AM
Location: Finland
Posts: 56
I have ran such transformer at about 400Hz, and it worked fine for a moment at about 15x voltage. It seemed to work at the viewpoint of core, but windings didn't of course stand it. Iron laminate is used in audio transformers.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat Apr 12 2008, 08:35PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Core losses rise at higher frequency due to both eddy currents in the lams, and tracing out the hysteresis curve more times per second. If you are after only intermittent operation and not worried about efficency, then running at 2x to 4x frequency ought to give you 2x to 4x the power output until you overheat, you should get minutes per run at only 4x. However dropping the peak flux by dropping the volts will bring the core losses back down as the sqaure, so perhaps 4x frequency with 75% voltage, you'll still get an increase in power, but longer run time and better efficiency. BTW, 400Hz aircraft trasnformers use very thin lams and a decent grade iron.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Sun Apr 13 2008, 01:10AM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
In general the iron and copper losses will be similar in most power transformers of reasonable size. As Neil said, core losses are built up of hysteresis loss and eddy current losses.

Running transformers at a higher frequency can also make the leakage inductance more problematic because it represents a higher impedance at the new operating frequency. (So for instance if you ran an MOT at a higher operating frequency you would expect the output s/c current to be lower for the same applied voltage because of the higher series reactance at the new operating frequency.) At frequencies much higher than the intended operating frequency you may also find parasitic resonances caused by the inter-layer capacitances of the windings.

-Richie,
Back to top
Arcstarter
Sun Apr 13 2008, 02:45AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Well i doubt this helps any but i ran an mot on 50 volts and got about 5kv from it at around 100-500 hertz and it was a 60hz 120 volt mot.
Back to top
Myke
Sun Apr 13 2008, 06:21AM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I think that someone here found that around 400Hz is best for MOTs.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun Apr 13 2008, 06:43AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Well my idea was to get more continouos power from a transformer. If the core loss would be too high then there is no reason for doing that.


Back to top
lpfthings
Sun Apr 13 2008, 11:00AM
lpfthings Registered Member #1361 Joined: Thu Feb 28 2008, 10:57AM
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 305
I think the manufacturer would optimise the transformer for the frequency it is designed for, but running them at higher frequencies should be OK
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.