Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 110
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Rocket Triggered Lightning

Move Thread LAN_403
Logan Kennedy
Wed Apr 02 2008, 08:31PM
Logan Kennedy Registered Member #1103 Joined: Mon Nov 05 2007, 06:02PM
Location: Houston
Posts: 80
It's quite possible that a HV source may not be required, but I don't have experimental evidence to support this hypothesis.

Yes, coin shrinking would be insane. Use some crazy gauge wire like 000, but even then I'm almost sure the wire would vaporize or be blown apart from the ENORMOUS energy. I'm not even sure if the coin would stay in one piece at this energy....

Use it for a raingun, or some other crazy device. This wasn't really what I planned on using it for, but it would be interesting to see the results of said experiments.
Back to top
...
Wed Apr 02 2008, 09:09PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
Really, the currents in lightnight aren't all that great when you compare it to what we can get from a decent set of pulse caps. The energy is huge because of extreemly high voltage, but the amount of pratical energy that we can harvest isn't much more than a few tens of kJ. Especially for quarter shrinking where you need the feild in a tiny spot, you would probably have better luck buying some large maxwells than the time/money/saftey of trying to get triggered lightning to work.
Back to top
Logan Kennedy
Wed Apr 02 2008, 09:57PM
Logan Kennedy Registered Member #1103 Joined: Mon Nov 05 2007, 06:02PM
Location: Houston
Posts: 80
I'm not too sure about that. Wikipedia has to say this about lightning:

An average bolt of lightning carries a negative electric current of 40 kiloamperes (kA) (although some bolts can be up to 120 kA), and transfers a charge of five coulombs and 500 MJ, or enough energy to power a 100 watt lightbulb for just under two months. The voltage depends on the length of the bolt, with the dielectric breakdown of air being three million volts per meter; this works out to approximately one gigavolt (one billion volts) for a 300 m (1000 ft) lightning bolt. With an electric current of 100 kA, this gives a power of 100 terawatts.

Also, it doesn't seem like it would take too much time or money to make this happen, however the safety issue is still fairly large, but yeah, like I said earlier, using lightning for coin shrinking isn't my purpose.
Back to top
Tesladownunder
Thu Apr 03 2008, 12:29AM
Tesladownunder Registered Member #10 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
Wikipedia is wrong on this point. Lightning is not billions of volts and 100TW is not the energy of a 1000ft stroke. Evidence points to the role of relativistic electrons triggered by cosmic ray events causing runaway breakdown as the cause of the hugely increased spark distances and other unexpected phenomena such as x-ray production.
The 100kA is reasonable though.
Here is what (an estimated) 100kA looks like in 1-2 ft of exploding wire. I didn't measure this current but it does 100-200kA measured into a short discharge path.
Not hot enuff fer yer ehhh?

TDU


1207182351 10 FT42445 Pulsecapexplodingwire35g2kjnoinductor
Back to top
Logan Kennedy
Thu Apr 03 2008, 02:01AM
Logan Kennedy Registered Member #1103 Joined: Mon Nov 05 2007, 06:02PM
Location: Houston
Posts: 80
I tried to verify the source for the wikipedia information, but didn't have enough time. Now that I think about it, I remember hearing something about the trigger mechanism of lightning being caused by cosmic rays.

That's pretty freaking hot it looks like! What temperature do you estimate it to be? I need roughly 10,000C, but more is always better in this situation. How much energy was that discharge?
Back to top
Tesladownunder
Thu Apr 03 2008, 02:17AM
Tesladownunder Registered Member #10 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
The temp should be about the 8000C in the spark channel which might only be 5mm thick. The air in the channel is only 1/20 the density because of the heat. Once you start to try to heat things up they will vaporise into a gas at 1/20th density as well. Can't help much more without knowing what you are planning.

Discharge 2.5kJ into 35g wire. About 4kV.

TDU
Back to top
Logan Kennedy
Thu Apr 03 2008, 03:18AM
Logan Kennedy Registered Member #1103 Joined: Mon Nov 05 2007, 06:02PM
Location: Houston
Posts: 80
I'm planning on vaporizing transition metals, and then testing the residual product to determine if they exhibit any odd behavior. I've heard claims that when certain transition metals are vaporized they turn into a form of "white" residue that might exhibit room temperature superconductive properties, and odd interactions with gravity.

If you've ever heard of ORME, then you should know what I'm talking about.

EDIT: Please note, I just received a message from a member telling me to remove the reference to ORME because it reeks of pseudoscience, and I agree with this member - it does reek of pseudoscience. I'm using REAL science to debunk this stuff once and for all. However, I will not remove the reference, but I will add this disclaimer.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Apr 03 2008, 10:21AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Oh, well remember to publish your results here then, even if they're negative! (Especially if they're negative.)

/me puts his James Randi hat on...

You might want to analyze the chemistry in a little more detail. What residual products do you think will be left when you vaporize metal?

To really vaporize some metal, you'd need to do it in a vacuum or an inert gas atmosphere, and all you'd have would be metal vapour, which would condense back into metal as soon as it cooled.

I can't see how there would be any residual products, unless the metal was impure to start with, in which case, you might end up separating the impurities in a process that was basically a form of distilling.

If you did this experiment in air, I think you'd end up burning the metal, not vaporising it, and I guess the result would be metal oxide. That's probably the white residue that people have seen, in which case it's sadly not anything exciting or new to science!

You could always try an arc welder, maybe with a carbon electrode instead of a welding rod. Last time I tried one of these, they could burn and vaporise metal no problem, usually when you want to weld it ill
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 03 2008, 12:55PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
From: Lightning Analysis in a High-voltage Transmission Environment by Erich R. Smidt

Typical characteristics of a lightning flash

Stroke diameter: 1 cm
Subsequent return strokes: 2-3
Peak current: 5-300kA
Stroke voltage: 100 million to 1 billion volts
Stroke temperature: 50,000 °F (28,000 ° C)
Nominal duration: 20-50 microseconds
Polarity: Negative or positive

Source: Link2

There is a very interesting paper, Runaway Breakdown
and the Mysteries of Lightning,
here:
Link2
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Apr 03 2008, 02:29PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
MODERATOR NOTE:

Lets keep the discussion on theoretical discussion only and not on any practical applications of actually doing something this dangerous.

I'm sure i speak for most of the moderators here, in that the 4hV group is certaintly not going to condone any type of experiments such as this. Not only is it extremely dangerous, it is ILLEGAL and against all model and high power rocketry regulations presently in place, at least in the United States. This type of experiment could be successfully implemented as part of a research arrangement, but there is lots of red tape to cut through befeore one gets authorization for something like that, and it usually has to be university affiliated etc...


From National Fire Protection Association
High Power Rocketry Code: NFPA 1127

4.17.1 No person shall ignite and launch a high power rocket horizontally, at a target, or so that the rocket's flight path during ascent phase is intended to go into clouds, directly over the heads of spectators, or beyond the boundaries of the launch site, or so that the rocket's recovery is likely to occur in spectator areas or outside the boundaries of the launch site.
(There are other regulations that are violated in this document, but i don't have time to list them all)

There are also FAA mandated regulations for high power rocketry as well, but unfortunately, i don't have the document in front of my to list a references.

Any more discussions on this subject in the practical sense and this thread will be locked.

Thank you

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.