Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 87
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

SSTC with IGBT's?

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Fri Mar 21 2008, 08:52AM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
I have some of these IGBT's STGW30NC60WD (200Amp pulsed), they have fast <50ns rise and fall times but what concerns me most is the turn-off delay time which is over 100ns.

Would these be suitable in a SSTC? I've never seen a sstc with IGBTs and I wonder if there is a good reason for it. What is interesting to me is the gate capacitance which is about 2-3x times less than in a similarly rated MOSFET, which allows for more efficient gate drive.

I know these would be good for a DRSSTC but I don't have the knowledge/materials/money/patience to build it.

So would these work for a medium size (~300-500khz) SSTC?



Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Mar 21 2008, 11:13AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Jim Mitchell made several tabletop SSTCs with fast IGBTs. I used them in my induction heater at 250kHz, too.
Back to top
Tom540
Fri Mar 21 2008, 02:33PM
Tom540 Banned on 3/17/2009.
Registered Member #487 Joined: Sun Jul 09 2006, 01:22AM
Location:
Posts: 617
My small ATX supply sstc used IGBT's and ran at 500KHz. As a matter of fact the igbts I used were similar to the ones you have, they were stgw40n60wd.

-Tom
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Fri Mar 21 2008, 05:53PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
I did some experiments with early generation STGW30NB60WD IGBTs at 350kHz in a SSTC about 6 years ago and they experienced a lot of heating when running CW at only a kw or so.

Modern IGBTs with minority carrier lifetime control are much faster and can be used in CW SSTCs but they should be tuned in a different way to how you tune a SSTC with MOSFETs. The most favourable operating condition for a MOSFET bridge is a slightly inductive load so that the load current lags the applied voltage. This gives ZVS, prevents turn-on losses due to Cds and also prevents forced reverse recovery of the MOSFET's slow body diodes. All of this is achieved by tuning the inverter to a frequency slightly higher than the resonant frequency of the Tesla Coil - The MOSFET inverter has a long and happy life when operated like this.

For IGBTs the situation is turned on its head. IGBTs have either internal or external fast diodes and much smaller device capacitances, but they don't like interrupting high currents and experience tail current losses. For an IGBT bridge driving a resonant network the most favourable operating condition is with a slightly capacitive load so that the load current leads the applied voltage slightly. This causes the load current to change direction just before each IGBT is told to switch off. It means that current through the IGBT channel naturally falls to zero and commutates smoothly to the diode with no tail current before the IGBT gate drive is actually removed. The downside is that free-wheel diodes see forced reverse recovery but fast diodes used here are well suited to this compared to slow MOSFET body-drain diodes. All this is achieved by operating the inverter at a frequency below the resonant frequency of the Tesla Coil, as is often done with CT feedback from the inverter output current.

Hopefully this will clarify some of the advantages and disadvantages of these two semiconductor technologies for SSTCs.

-Richie,

BTW Jan, I like your Trance tune - you can probably tell from my Avatar I'm also into electronic music.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.