Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 37
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Gavin (49)
Froskoy (33)
UnHappy1 (59)


Next birthdays
07/17 Eric (53)
07/17 HM_Murdock (53)
07/18 Billybobjoe (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

mosfets vs power transistors

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
cbfull
Wed Jan 23 2008, 05:10PM
cbfull Registered Member #187 Joined: Thu Feb 16 2006, 02:54PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 140
... wrote ...
Really all that is necesary to make the mosfets share a load gracefully is to add a large amout of resistance in series with the drain...
Hmm... What if you are parallel-ing the mosfets because you want to reduce the resistance and get more current? Seems like this technique is counter productive.

Just a thought.
Back to top
...
Wed Jan 23 2008, 11:15PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
The technique works both when running in the linear mode (as IamSmooth is proposing) and when running in saturation (as is normally the case). When running the fets in saturation the variations in Rds are very small, usually not more than a few hundred micro ohms to a few miliohms depending on the device, so only a very small amount of series resistance is needed.

In this application the transistors are only being paralleled to allow for a large overall power dissipation, and the fets are never driven into saturation, so adding series resistance simple reduces power consumption in fets.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Jan 24 2008, 10:30AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I still don't think adding resistance in series with the drain would work well. The drain has a very high impedance and looks like a constant current sink. If you're putting resistance somewhere, it ought to be ballast on the source, so the voltage drop across it appears in series with Vgs.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Thu Jan 24 2008, 01:03PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
I am only disagreeing with Steve Conner's definition of the problem, not his solution. It's perhaps worth being picky about the difference, in case someone tries to extrapolate these suggestions to a different case.

If the goal is to make the FETs *share current* roughly equally in the linear mode, then the ballast resistors must go in the source, for exactly the same reason that ballast resistors in the BJT case go in the emitter. It provides negative feedback as its voltage drop reduces the Vbe or the Vgs.

If the problem is to avoid the greediest (lowest Vth) FET going bang because unequal current sharing in the linear mode caused it to take excess current, then drain resistors *will* acheive that, by limiting the dissipation of each FET individually. However, the amps per volt, or transconductance, of the set of FETs and resistors will be non-linear. If the current is around the middle of FSD, then some FETs may have already saturated and some will be yet to come on. These will contribute nothing to the transconductance. Thus as the Vgs rises different FETs, and different numbers of FETs, will control the transconductance. This is not necessarily a problem in a simple voltage clamp, but if you want programmable current drawn, or you want stability with it in a loop, then you may have problems.

Source resistors, as they also provide negative feedback, will stabilise the transconductance.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.