Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 39
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/14 hvguy (42)
05/14 thehappyelectron (15)
05/14 Justin (2025)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Cherenkov radiation, HV and home experiments

Move Thread LAN_403
Marko
Fri Nov 30 2007, 05:16PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145

So my question is: Do you think is it possible to induce Cherenkov radiation in water only by electric current off sufficient voltage (or you still need a particle accelerator)? What if I take water with salt (like NaCl) and use it as a conductor for my 500KV Marx discharge? Can the salt ions exceed the speed of light in the water?

No. Even at what you would think as huge currents electrons move very slow in a conductor.
Ions even slower due to their mass and size.

Otherwise I don't see why would anyone want to build those multi-billion dollar particle acellerators to gett massive particles close to speed of light, we could just use salty water.

Back to top
Mates
Fri Nov 30 2007, 10:29PM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Marko wrote ...


Otherwise I don't see why would anyone want to build those multi-billion dollar particle acellerators to gett massive particles close to speed of light, we could just use salty water.


Multi-bilion dollar accelerators are used to get particles of energies in GeV. All what I'm talking about is 0.29MeV which is achievable in home conditions by simple linacs. The speed of light in water is relatively low (to compare to vacuum) - the speeds of partciles in huge accelators are related to the speed of light in vacuum and not in water. You are mixing two things. But I fully accept your doubts... wink
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Sat Dec 01 2007, 06:32PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
If you get some water and copper sulphate solution you can pour a layer of water onto the denser sulphate solution.
If you arange for a current to be passed through this you will see just how slowly the blue Cu++ ions move.
The speed of light is a good deal faster.
Back to top
Mates
Sun Dec 02 2007, 10:30AM
Mates Registered Member #1025 Joined: Sun Sept 23 2007, 07:53PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 566
Bored Chemist wrote ...

If you get some water and copper sulphate solution you can pour a layer of water onto the denser sulphate solution.
If you arange for a current to be passed through this you will see just how slowly the blue Cu++ ions move.
The speed of light is a good deal faster.

Are you trying to suggest that if take a water bath with salt ions and put in series with a diode that there will be a measurable delay after the circuit is switched on. In other words the diode will emit light later than diode which is connected straight? I think if there is a measurable delay you can hardly measure it with the fastest scopes…

I also do not understand how you can see ions with your eyes (you must have really cool macro options in your retina), what you see is probably precipitated Cu which is huge to compare with a single ion and of course travels very slowly...
Back to top
aahz
Sun Dec 02 2007, 11:05AM
aahz Registered Member #186 Joined: Thu Feb 16 2006, 07:22AM
Location:
Posts: 42
There wouldn't be a measurable delay because the electrons don't just start at one end and have to 'fill' the area between the two contacts.... when you create the voltage, electrons start moving in the entire circuit simultaneously.

It's like a water filled pipe: If you apply pressure to one end, water immediately flows from the other end... even if it takes the water at the beginning of the pipe minutes to reach the end.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.