Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 110
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

[moved] how to estimate copper plate connection resistance?

Move Thread LAN_403
Barry
Sun Oct 21 2007, 03:51AM
Barry Registered Member #90 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:44PM
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 301
Fortunately, arcing at turn-on is less of a problem. Some arcing is inevitable but it occurs at lower current. The turn-on time can be slower than even a slow IGBT.

With the relatively large inductive load of coilguns, it takes a short time for current to ramp up to high levels. This gives a small cushion of time (perhaps 50 to 500 usec depending on the LC time constant etc.) to establish a full-face contact area before the current begins ripping chunks out of the copper and dispersing them evenly around the room. I am expecting this extra time will allow switch closure rates substantially below 100 m/s.

<speculation type="wild">It sounds to me like a copper block makes a decent projectile for a good linear induction motor. Perhaps an induction coilgun can shoot the copper block into the bigger switch to fire the monster coilgun ... nah ... what switch would I use for the first linear induction motor? tongue </speculation>

If this idea pans out, I'll be sure to provide a full write-up, and maybe even a video.

Barry
Never use a long word where a diminutive one will suffice.
Back to top
...
Sun Oct 21 2007, 05:00AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
I wouldn't really worry about it, look at TDU's can crusher... There is very little contact in that switch (in fact his demo one uses 1/8" rods perpendicular to each other), and it is feeding a load of like 4 turns amazed
Back to top
JimmyH
Tue Nov 06 2007, 03:29AM
JimmyH Registered Member #358 Joined: Sat Apr 01 2006, 06:13AM
Location: UCSB
Posts: 28
If you know the shape of the contacts, you can calculating it by integrating up the infinitesimal resistance coming from the section with thickness dx (assuming the x = constant plane is an equipotential, maybe r = constant is more realistic). You can also solve Laplace's equation with the appropriate boundary conditions, which will figure out the equipotential surface deal, and give you the resistance, but that's not a fun way of doing it.

For example, lets calculate the resistance of 2 truncated pyramids contacting at their truncated tips. Since the pyramids are identical in this example, its just 2 times the resistance of a cone between the two points.

The resistivity of a pyramid is the integral of (d resistance/dx)*dx over the correct limits. The resistance of a slab with thickness dx is calculatd the same for a large thickness, so it is just (bulk resistivity)*dx/area.

That gives us the integral of (bulkresistivity)/(a*x)^2 dx, where a is the side length/distance from point and x is the distance from the point. When integrated out, you get -(bulk resistivity)/(a^2*x). lets plug in 1mm and 1cm for x, a = 1 and bulkresistivity = 1.678*10^-8 ohm*meters (copper). We get 1.5102*10^-5 ohms. If we plug in 1mm and infinity, we get
an extra 1.678 micro ohms, while if we plug in 0 and 1mm, the result is infinite, so you know the resistance is dominated by the contact. <= that is all for one pyramid, multiply by 2 to get the resistance for the whole assembly

The downside of this approach is that you really have to know your shape. If you don't have enough pressure to really force the surfaces together, you don't know the real contact area. Garbage in garbage out...

The other approach is to just try it. Push two pieces of copper together, put a few amps through, and then put a mv meter on it, and just measure it with different amount of force on it.

Either way, more force = more better, and more softer = more better.

I would just go with IGBTs, but that's beside the point.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.