If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #102
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:15PM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 169
Hey guys. This post has mostly to do with saturatable reactors. But since the load is a pole pig (actually two) i thought I'd throw that in the title too.
First. The video.
Ok so the video starts with the reactor's DC winding at 0V. It's obvious that the current is successfully being limited. at the end of the video, the power is suspected to be about 24kW. My configuration consists of two very large variable reactors, in series with a choke, and the two pole pigs. (I have enclose a picture of a reactor showing all 3 windings) I'm using the inside primary on the pigs, so I'm trying to put ~120v across each LV winding.
Right now the reactor's individual windings are in parallel. But one reactor doesn't offer enough current limiting. So my question is: can I put one reactor's individual windings in series to control 240V. I suspect the reactors are meant for 208V.
I only want to use one reactor to control both transformers. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
Registered Member #146
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
Seems like you should have no problem seriesing the windings. If your phase them incorrectly, then you will cancel out almost all of the inductance, but the other way will give you about 4X the inductance (of one winding alone). So it should be pretty obvious when you get it right :P.
One thing i never understood about saturable reactors is that they use a DC input to bias the core. This would give asymmetrical inductance as when the input is in one direction the core fluxes add (and saturate the core easily) but the other direction the fluxes subtract, so you have to push more current through your ballasting winding to make it saturate. Perhaps there is more to it than this?
Registered Member #102
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:15PM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 169
With the reactors, it deosn't seem to matter which polarity the windings are powered. They are connected in series inside, so I kinda doubt it matters.
Well I tried putting the reactor windings in series, it works quite well except for one thing. The DC winding now has in excess of 1000V across it (electrons will jump through air) And instead of limiting by how much DC Voltage is across it, it seems that it limits by how much of a load is put across that winding. I shorted the DC winding and the controlled windings are almost a short. If I leave 0 load across the DC winding i get almost full quenching of current. Any ideas? am i now going to control with a variable resistor?
Registered Member #89
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
One thing i never understood about saturable reactors is that they use a DC input to bias the core. This would give asymmetrical inductance as when the input is in one direction the core fluxes add (and saturate the core easily) but the other direction the fluxes subtract, so you have to push more current through your ballasting winding to make it saturate. Perhaps there is more to it than this?
That's why two cores are used with AC winding out of phase on each other, so output is symmetrical. At least as I figured out.
Now I'm not quite clear with the pic but are those two windings on separate C pairs under the big winding?
Registered Member #102
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:15PM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 169
hey
I think i can safely say I had it wired incorrectly when I made my last post.
I'm depending on the schematic found at the bottom of this page. The transformers I have seem to match this quite true to form. There are two cores: each are wound with large wire very close to the core and the cores are not touching. Around the outside of them is a DC winding; which seems to be insulated for amazingly high potential.
On a name plate the DC control winding(s) is speced at 25V 4.5A.
I've now rewired it (there are 4 ways it can be wired) and control voltage has to reach about 60V rms to fully saturate the reactor. (or more likely the pig) Is it possible that putting the reactor in series would require twice the voltage to saturate it? Or have i yet to configure it properly?
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, the two windings need to be wired out of phase. If you are getting high voltage induced in your control winding, you need to swap one of them over. The induced EMF in the control winding should cancel.
Steve, you are right that each core of the reactor will only saturate in one direction. That's why it's made with two cores wired back-to-back. Well, the textbook diagrams often show a fancy three or four limbed core, but the way Kolas's reactor is built with two separate cores makes it clearer. The two cores are separate magnetic circuits with their own high-current windings, and only the control winding is common between them.
Registered Member #964
Joined: Wed Aug 22 2007, 12:39AM
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 134
Err. What IS a reactor, exacltly? It looks to me like three coils wound like chain links. Would someone please explain? I'm clueless... Anyway, that's a pretty cool video. The arcs where awesome.
Registered Member #152
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Spedy wrote ...
Err. What IS a reactor, exacltly? It looks to me like three coils wound like chain links. Would someone please explain? I'm clueless... Anyway, that's a pretty cool video. The arcs where awesome.
You put a small DC current on the control coil, this changes how much the core saturates, which in turn changes the amount of current that flows through the drive coils. It's like a magnetic amplifier.
Registered Member #964
Joined: Wed Aug 22 2007, 12:39AM
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 134
jmartis wrote ...
Spedy wrote ...
Err. What IS a reactor, exacltly? It looks to me like three coils wound like chain links. Would someone please explain? I'm clueless... Anyway, that's a pretty cool video. The arcs where awesome.
You put a small DC current on the control coil, this changes how much the core saturates, which in turn changes the amount of current that flows through the drive coils. It's like a magnetic amplifier.
Ah. I'm guessing that the middle one is the control. That's pretty cool, I wonder who invented them...
Registered Member #477
Joined: Tue Jun 20 2006, 11:51PM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 546
Some years ago, I'd suggested to TCML the idea of using multiple seriesed MOTs to make saturable reactor ballasts for pigs and the like. Due to tolerances and differences in construction, I imagine you definitely *do* need to worry about induced voltages in the control windings, even when things are wired correctly. At the time, I created some neat-looking schematics showing how such things might be used to ballast pigs, including a double-hot configuration that would allow you to ground the neutral of your pole pig, which is something you aren't usually able to do with a single 240V reactor. I've never tried this myself, however a couple of folks did and reported ok results:
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.