Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 106
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RateReducer (35)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

"Half dead" semiconductors

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Aug 25 2007, 02:24PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Hi all, is it possible that a semiconductor (fet/igbt/whatever) gets partially damaged and it is still able to operate in some conditions, but with some "quirks" (less current/voltage ability, slower switching etc.)? I'm asking because I blew ONE igbt in a halfbridge, the other still seems ok at low power tests, should I replace both or is it ok to replace just the blown one?
Back to top
Zum Beispiel
Sat Aug 25 2007, 02:52PM
Zum Beispiel Registered Member #514 Joined: Sun Feb 11 2007, 12:27AM
Location: Somewhere in Pirkanmaa, Finland
Posts: 295
I had a failure on my SSTC halfbridge where the upper fet died short cicuit. The other fet seemed to be fine when I tested it so I just replaced the upper one. Powered it up to full power and it ran for a few seconds and then the fuse blew. This time the lower fet died, the upper one seemed to be ok. I replaced both and haven't had failures since then...

Just my 2cents.

Back to top
Sulaiman
Sat Aug 25 2007, 04:07PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
I've had exactly the same experience with SSTC bridges.
One mosfet short-circuit, the other seems ok
but just replacing the faulty mosfet causes failure again.
I learnt (after loosing several mosfets) to replace both
even if one seems ok at low voltage.
e.g. ok with 24Vac in to bridge rectifier for mosfet bridge power,
failure with 240Vac in.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Aug 25 2007, 04:35PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
ok I'll replace both, this is getting a bit expensive dead but who cares if it works
Back to top
Dalus
Sat Aug 25 2007, 05:07PM
Dalus Registered Member #639 Joined: Wed Apr 11 2007, 09:09PM
Location: The Netherlands, Herkenbosch
Posts: 512
Just measure the D to S resistence if it doesn't match a new fet within 30% it would fail.
Back to top
ragnar
Sun Aug 26 2007, 12:15AM
ragnar Registered Member #63 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:18AM
Location:
Posts: 1425
Often MOSFETs will fail incompletely.

To measure the (apparent) intactness of a MOSFET, grab a multimeter and set it to resistance (10Mohm range)

If you put the positive probe on the source, and the negative probe on the drain, you should get a reading of about 5 - 15Mohm. This is very temperature dependent -- just warming a small MOSFET with your breath/hand will cause this reading to go down a few Mohms.

Now check that there's an approximately 0.5V drop across the same pins.

If a MOSFET has a D-S resistance of several hundred kohms, it's most likely popped, or about to.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Aug 26 2007, 08:58AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Bear in mind that static charge on the gate pin can turn the MOSFET partly on and make it look bad. To be fair and consistent, you should connect the gate to the source or something.
Back to top
ragnar
Sun Aug 26 2007, 09:50AM
ragnar Registered Member #63 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:18AM
Location:
Posts: 1425
Ah, thanks Steve -- I forgot to mention; before you make these measurements, smush a probes against all three pins like I do, to dissipate any residual charge.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun Aug 26 2007, 10:36AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
BlackPlasma wrote ...

Often MOSFETs will fail incompletely.
...
Ok you mention MOSFETs, but had anyone an IGBT fail incompletely?
I'll replace both anyways, but I don't feel like throwing away a fully functional device.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Aug 26 2007, 11:08AM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
I don't think something as such can happen in ordinary circumstances, at least not from what I've seen. Mosfet will always test bad if they are dead. It's not enough to test the diode or off resistance, make sure you give them a full operation test.

I never had a mosfet or IGBT that probed functional to fail for reason of being 'damaged'.
If it was, it was obvious jet at testing. Failures of these semiconductors have a great positive feedback, after it goes just a bit short it will instantly dump large amount of power and vaporise completely.

Lots of IGBT's sold on ebay are from 'dead' bridges where one IGBT has failed, yet we buy them and they work fine.

If you are rich and afraid of using survivor IGBT's give them or sell to someone.

I would rather ask myself why the first IGBT in halfbridge failed after all.




Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.