If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
For the above design, I think this is it, I will not modify it further. Even if the capacitor can withstand higher current pulses, increasing current through coil would mean thickening the wire, but that comes with reduction of number of windings (to keep the same length), which is not desirable. Increasing the length creates other mechanical problems.
My spreadsheet gives that coil an inductance of 470 nH, which is much higher value than other values seen in this thread. Brings L/R to almost 0.4 milliseconds, if we don't count the ESR of the supercapacitor. How much is that, by the way?
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
Thanks for helping with the calculations, I don't mind at all. I'm not very good at those, mainly because I have some gaps in the theory, here and there. I usually replace those gaps with intuition. Sometimes it works, sometimes not, but I like smoke shows and fireworks anyway :) Coil ID is most certainly 6mm because I used a 6mm aluminium rod to build the coil, then I extracted it out and replaced with that plastic tube which has also 6mm diameter. Also, the copper wire is 2.5mm OD. But the wire length is very approximate, because I initially prepared 2 wires, aprox. 1m length, then winded those on the aluminium rod, then cut the excess off. But I was not wise enough to exactly measure the length before winding it, so I cannot say for sure how much wire is inside. What I can say is that the coil length is very close to the capacitor length, which is 108.5mm according to datasheet. The DC ESR for this capacitor is 270 microohms and the combined rdson of mosfets is 137.5 microohms typical. But rdson is measured at 100A Id, so, I cannot say for sure what is the rdson at 1000 amps.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Thanks for clarifying the dimensions. From geometric calculations I'm still getting about 810 microohms for the coil (two 454-mm wires in parallel). That doesn't match your posted voltage and current values, even if we accounted for the change in cross-section and resistivity from tightly coiling the wire.
You've told us the resistance of your supercapacitor and MOSFETs with high precision. Why not do the same for the coil resistance?
You could weigh the coil and look up ohms per kilogram (or per pound) in a standard wire table. That depends on being sure of the wire gauge. 2.5 mm OD is too small to be 10 AWG, especially if measured over the insulation. And it's not close to any standard square-mm conductor size.
The best way to get the coil resistance is to measure it. Can you run a steady current through the coil, perhaps about 10 amperes AC or DC, and measure the voltage drop? You can get measurements 4 times larger by temporarily separating your bifilar winding at one end, then driving the strands in series instead of parallel. Don't forget that copper resistance goes up 10% for each 25 degrees C.
Der Albi wrote: >> supercapacitor's energy density is 10x - 100x higher than aluminium caps (lets say 50x) according to wikipedia.
Yes, but supercapacitors have lower power density. You need seconds to get all that energy out, compared to milliseconds with the aluminum electrolytics. And microseconds with high voltage (multi-kV) caps.
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
I told you parameters for capacitor and for transistors with high precision because it's in the datasheet. The coil was built on the rush and unfortunately I was not paying enough attention to its details. But I will try to measure it as soon as I have some time. I have means to run high currents through it, even if with not great precision (it's a 10A benchtop power supply) and I can also measure voltage with precision of 4 decimals, 2 volts full scale. Will get back with data when it's available.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Sounds good. I forgot to mention that it's easy to protect your MOSFETs from overvoltage when they turn off. Just put a suitable pulse-rated diode in parallel with the coil, as you would with a relay coil. It makes the current decay more slowly, but that's insignificant in this case, because L/R is so short.
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. However I have some doubts, mainly because the physical connection is long considering the coil dimensions and I'll have to put some wires(read inductance) on the diode leads. And if I remember correctly, that pulse looked extremely steep on the scope, under 20ns. It may be even steeper, as my scope is not a very high speed one, and those 20ns may not be the real signal, rather the limitation of the scope...
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
I did the measurement, with a current of 4.67A, the voltage at coil terminals is 5.22mV, results R=1.117 miliohms. With this value, the current through coil, at 2V voltage, is around 1700A.
LE: I'm very sorry, I was mistaking about diameter of the coil. The ID of the coil is 8mm, not 6. The ID of that plastic tube is 6mm actually. There was a time when I was younger and my memory was better....
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Oh good. With your new coil diameter, my resistance model is only 10% different from your new, measured resistance value (using method suggested by Der Albi). Close enough to say there's no mystery.
Where did you get your coil inductance numbers, given as 10 to 100 nH? Wheeler's formula is now giving me around 250 nH.
Those voltage spikes at MOSFET turning-off time indicate a circuit dominated by inductance, at the time scale of switch transitions. Just as it's dominated by resistance, at the timescale of the projectile-launching pulse.
You could get the inductance value by measuring the height and width of a braking-voltage spike. For example, suppose FET drain to source voltage is 40 V for 5 microseconds, as the coil current ramps from its final on-state value to zero, and the other end of coil and supercapacitor remain at +2 volts. That would be (40-2)*5 = 190 volt-microseconds on the coil. Same as the product of coil L and the on-state current, in ampere-microhenrys. e.g. 1000 A * 0.19 uH, or 1700 A * 0.11 uH.
We don't need to ignore the resistive aspect of the circuit. The I*R drop from the coil's own wire resistance helps to stop the currrent. It's about 2 V during most of the 0.01-second ON pulse. Let's say 1 V, on average, during the on-to-off ramp. So it contributed 5 volt-microseconds of stopping power, bringing the total to 195. This "refinement" would increase the bottom-line inductance result by about 2.5% in this example.
Suppose you deliberately made the MOSFET gate voltage slew more slowly, enough that the "braking" voltage amplitude did not exceed the "breaking" V_DS specification on the data sheet. I think that would be less abusive to the transistor, even though the total energy is the same. Maybe a power MOSFET expert will speak up here. Isn't this a place for a snubber network?
I stand by my earlier recommendation of a plain clamp diode. It would be nice to find one with an impulse current rating (I^2*t, given in A^2*s). Not counting inductance of the diode circuuit, the braking voltage (between coil terminals) is then set by Vf(diode), on the order of 1 volt. When helped by the coil's IR drop, which we said averages about 1 volt, it might take about 100 us to bring the current to zero.
Registered Member #61593
Joined: Mon May 01 2017, 07:55PM
Location:
Posts: 14
Coil inductance numbers were mostly to indicate range, rather than an exact value. They were taken from some calculator from net, don't remember which one. If your calculation is 250nH, then it must be close to reality. I don't know if I can measure true ramp of that spike. I have several scopes, but the fastest have 100mhz bandwidth. In this case I'm not sure if the scope shows the true ramp of the spike. Thanks for analysis, it will sure help if I decide to proceed to next design. But this is uncertain due to lack of time.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.