Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Gavin (49)
Froskoy (33)
UnHappy1 (59)


Next birthdays
07/17 Eric (53)
07/17 HM_Murdock (53)
07/18 Billybobjoe (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

"resonance" hype on BBC news

Move Thread LAN_403
WaveRider
Thu Nov 16 2006, 08:47AM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
I think there is some science in the BBC article. There is nothing miraculous about it tho'.. It seems to be nothing more than inductive energy transfer not unlike what is used in RFID chips and thos electronic key cards that you wave in front of a sensor.

Essentially, in the "power supply", we have a resonant LC circuit that draws negligible power when nothing is near it (high Q, "long-lived resonances"). When you put your PDA equipped with an inductive pickup coil (perhaps resonant too) near the power supply's resonant circuit inductor, some power is coupled into the PDA's pickup coil and rectified and charges the battery. It is inherently short range....a few 10s of centimeters at best... I am sceptical about the "transmitting significant power over many meters" claim... I'd have to think about it a bit...

The thing I find absurd about this article is not that it may be BS, but the technology is older than I am...someone has just discovered that it can be made "fashionable" by charging your cute little electronic "lifestyle" devices with it.


Back to top
ragnar
Thu Nov 16 2006, 11:10AM
ragnar Registered Member #63 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:18AM
Location:
Posts: 1425
wrote ...
The thing I find absurd about this article is not that it may be BS, but the technology is older than I am...someone has just discovered that it can be made "fashionable" by charging your cute little electronic "lifestyle" devices with it.
Mmm, that's why BBC is full of crap. =(

Here's good reading regarding the 'localized heating' argument re: the businessman/teenager and microwaves/EM through the head:
Link2

If little wireless energy transfer systems come into vogue, it'll give the activists a new lease on life, if power lines and mobile phones aren't bad enough. ^^
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Thu Nov 16 2006, 06:02PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
"I am serious about reading the arxiv document before commenting."
I'd love to, but I get a file not found error.
Back to top
Bjørn
Thu Nov 16 2006, 09:04PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
The forum software seems to be broken on some URL's, it even inserted a space in it so copy and paste would not work either.

This one should work: Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Nov 17 2006, 04:02PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I guess I should clarify the statement I made that high Q=low efficiency, since intuitively you'd think the opposite. (Q is quality factor, and the higher quality something is, the more efficient it must be, right?)

Not necessarily. I'm referring to the loaded Q of the system as a whole, which is really more related to power factor than anything else. If the loaded Q of the power transmission system is, say, 100, then you have reactive currents (or voltages) 100 times higher than if you'd just transmitted the power directly with wires. That is the same thing as having a power factor of 0.01. Hence the losses (either I2R or dielectric) could be up to 10,000 times greater than with direct transmission.

That was one of the findings we took away from the work done on DRSSTCs in the last year or two. The unloaded Q of a Tesla coil can be several hundred, but once the streamer discharge is established, the loaded Q is about 10. It's also discussed at length in articles on RF power amp design.

P.S. For the frequencies and antenna geometries they seem to suggest, I think the loaded Q would be at least 100. (in other words, the coupling's maybe not that strong)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.