If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3964
Joined: Thu Jun 23 2011, 03:23AM
Location: Valenzuela City
Posts: 332
Hi All,
It's been a while since I tried to make my bucked - qcw work well, here are the specs:
Sec Fres Alone: ~350 kHz Pri Fres Alone: ~330 kHz
Total Fres: ~400 kHz I pri: 165 Amps (in the photo, but I limit it at 180 amps- OCD kicks in) V bus Charged to: 430V V ramp peak: 400 V
Breakout point to ceiling: 74 inches
I don't know why spark branches.. I want to make it sword like.. Ramp is smooth as in the photo, but branching is always there :( can anyone help me to remove or at least reduce its branches?
Here is the Vid:
another thing, is when I try to change tap / or reduce capacitance of Pri Caps to higher primary frequency, Bus / and Primary Current waveform is being distorted? looks like it's having a flat at the middle of the ramp.. causing branches.. but in the photo below, I tapped the primary whereas the distortion doesn't occur.
another thing, is when I try to change tap / or reduce capacitance of Pri Caps to higher primary frequency, Bus / and Primary Current waveform is being distorted? looks like it's having a flat at the middle of the ramp..
The primary current does not follow bus voltage in a simple way, since the primary current also depends on arc loading. The capacitance of the arc changes the secondary resonant frequency and that will change the tuning. This again determines how much power is transferred from the primary to the secondary. If there is much power transfer, then the primary current might drop due to the energy drawn or remain flat, although bus voltage increases. A too rapid increase of power transfer to the secondary might also cause the arc to branch. Perhaps it will help to play around with the tuning. The point of straightest sparks might not coincide with the one of longest ones. Another approach would be to change the shape of the bus voltage ramp.
Registered Member #146
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
I can't say i know what to do to make the sparks less branchy, but some things i would look at are:
1) Truncate the ramp/pulse window to see roughly when the sparks tend to branch. Sometimes it happens early, sometimes late in the evolution of the spark.
2) I used a 4-segment piece-wise-linear ramp generator that allowed some fine adjustments of the ramp rate at different parts of the burst, this did seem to help on the coils that just didn't naturally produce the straightest sparks.
3) Try different tunings. I found that tuning the primary below secondary Fres seemed to help, but my first system didn't have this option to begin with, and it still made pretty straight sparks under the right conditions. I believe tuning acts as its own modifier to the "ramp" as the effective impedance of the system changes with spark load.
However, i can think of instances that contradict what i just said about tuning, so i really don't know. Every QCW coil i ever made behaved differently and some would never give nice branchless sparks. I note that i got the longest, straightest sparks when using a 4"x13" toroid, or a 3"x16" toroid.
As to breakout points, i always found that too-long is no good as the sparks would tend to branch early. I've used sharp ones and blunt ones and it didn't seem to matter.
I also note that it generally seems hard to make really long sparks that dont branch because the really long sparks require higher voltages which will promote the branch formation on an existing "non branched" spark. The non-branched spark is just really unnatural . If you aim for shorter spark lengths (say 1/2 - 3/4 of max) can you more easily find the right settings for no-branch? That was often the case for me. The pulse length should be roughly 1/2 to 3/4 of the length of the longest sparks. I find an ideal rate was about 3-4mS per foot of spark.
Registered Member #3964
Joined: Thu Jun 23 2011, 03:23AM
Location: Valenzuela City
Posts: 332
Hi Everyone,
Ok, first of all I would like to thank you for your suggestions.
The day after I post the first video (more spark branch) I found the issues..
1. V ramp input is not firm (it causes distortion in the actual /following arbitrary DC voltage in the inverter side of the coil) 2. My Ramp generator is analog (it is actually made by 555 timers, some PNP transistors and PWM generator) 3. Ramp generator is connected via 5 ft RCA cable 4. Tuning on the Primary (I moved to 20 kHz higher)
After doing adjustments base on the above points, I recorded another video.. It seems it improved compared to the first vid in my post above
To Upsring: Yes, but I think Current with respect to V should be proportional by bigger percentage; loading could affect current but still just a bit. I truly agree on the point whereas rapid transfer will cause branch. I observed the current while coil is working. I can see if there are even mild spike in current, spark will branch regardless if it is at the beginning, middle or peak of the ramp. My current set up is : charge the Filter Cap (20mF) to 430V via boost converter then I can control the peak of the ramp( up to 400v) by pots on my ramp generator. I can also change the magnitude of initial dc bias realtime via pots (~50v dc) before ramp slope begins; I can also change realtime the length of the ramp 15ms to 25ms. If the peak is too high (~400v) this means that the SLOPE creates bigger angle and this causes sudden curve in the ramp (I will show pics soon on this).. Now I am still planning to reduce the tank impedance since I want more current with less voltage (this reduces the angle of slope in the ramp).. until now, my setup is ~2.5 ohms (400v/160A) effective impedance.. I will try to reduce it to 2.25 or 2 ohms by Tap change and Cap change.
To Steve:
On your points:
1. TRUE 2. I don't have access to it - I am working all analog (my QCW is I think the first one not using any micro nor fibers :) ) 3. TRUE with exceptions; big torroids means greater spark control; Breakout point - i don't know if this is true (this is in the area of 2 to 3 inches)
"If you aim for shorter spark lengths (say 1/2 - 3/4 of max) can you more easily find the right settings for no-branch?" - Same in my observation, my thinking rationale are the following: a. Ramp Slope is less abrupt b. Cap run out of juice (?) c. interference is less
"The pulse length should be roughly 1/2 to 3/4 of the length of the longest sparks. I find an ideal rate was about 3-4mS per foot of spark" -I am in these regions too, producing more than 6 ft sparks @ 160 Amps @ 15ms is where I am at., and I think increasing the length of the ramp would cause less angle in the slope, I tried this but not successful. I think I am hitting the length vs Current magnitude relation whereas too long for less Current could cause brushy fat sparks.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.