Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Nicko (57)


Next birthdays
04/20 gentoo_daemon (43)
04/21 kilovolt (50)
04/21 wannabegeekTC (50)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

EmDrive improvements

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Mon Jan 11 2016, 06:46AM Print
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Hi all.

Looking at current efforts with high frequency (24GHz) setups got me thinking.

Could it be possible to make an EmDrive using a stack of etched double sided PCBs with the chamber made out of copper islands within them, and connected together to provide a contiguous structure?
Each PCB would be spaced from the next by a thin piece of plastic so that the structure is rigid.

This would have several advantages, not least that the permeability of FR-4 is well known and by compressing or stretching out the stack the geometry of the chamber could be tuned to the Gunn diode's resonant frequency.

I know that Gunn diodes are not particularly efficient but they are relatively low cost compared to a solid state RF amplifier ($20 versus $2000+) and easily swapped out if they fail.

See Link2
Link2

Additional wave-shaping could be accomplished by putting copper dots or other microstructures on alternating layers
to encourage the formation of a standing wave within the chamber, which has an effect on Q-factor.
Also worth doing is drilling small holes in the PCBs near the edges of the copper islands as this is where most of the power would be concentrated so losses here would be more critical.

I read that one problem with copper chambers is that they oxidize quite easily so coating with a thin layer of UV setting glue post etching would be advisable.

-A

Back to top
Karmaslap
Mon Jan 11 2016, 02:03PM
Karmaslap Registered Member #58215 Joined: Wed Dec 30 2015, 11:27AM
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 65
Are you proposing multiple smaller EmDrives stacked on top of each other?
I'm still a big skeptic of it, but checking in on results on the reddit sub and nasa forums. Hopefully someone here can answer (some guys on 4hv with the know-how doing an RF cavity thruster test would be quite cool)
But in the event that they cannot, I suggest you ask your question here:
<http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php? board=73.0>
Or here:
<https://www.reddit.com/r/EmDrive/>

Both are filled with people who are either fanatical supporters because it is "awesome" and some scientists actually trying to test the validity.
Back to top
jpsmith123
Tue Jan 12 2016, 03:27PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
I don't know much about "EmDrive", but to the extent the effect is real, doesn't it depend on being able to produce very high EM field strength inside a specially shaped resonant cavity?

If that's the case, then it seems to me that you'd be plagued by the same issues that limit the accelerating gradients in high energy RF/microwave linear accelerators; i.e., field emission, multipactoring, etc.

So I would think that you'd need mechanically strong and stable, vacuum compatible, highly polished, highly conductive (or superconducting) structures, carefully designed to minimize surface electric fields.

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.