If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #54503
Joined: Sun Feb 22 2015, 10:35PM
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 288
OK, im pretty new here, but i dont fully understand the difference between a full bridge and a half bridge inverter, other than people saying you get double the voltage output but you need more components.
What confuses me more is that i see people referring to their inverter as a Full H-Bridge, whats that supposed to mean? Thats like saying you have a full half bridge inverter, how can it be both?
Im going to use CM300DY-24H series IGBT modules in a very similar fashion to Loneoceans DRSSTC3 but i cant find the exact schematic, but it looks rather simple in the way they are wired up basically the GDT outputs connect straight to the gates of each IGBT.
Id imagine the schematic below is a full bridge, but its unclear to me on steve's page if its a full bridge or half bridge configuration, if it is referring to the power supply using a voltage doubler or not then i will feel like a complete idiot! lol
Anyway besides that, i am unsure what D14-D18 or D6-D13 are for as i dont see anyone using them on their units.
I also dont know what side of the primary coil the current transformers are supposed to connect to and im interested to know if it matters what way around the primary is connected (i.e the internal winding and outside tapped cable) I would imagine it would change the phasing of the secondary, not that i can see any issue with this. TIA
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
That's an 'H-bridge' inverter, aka 'full H-bridge', aka 'full bridge', aka 'bridge' inverter. The four switching devices and the load make up the 5 short lines of the letter 'H'.
A 'half bridge' inverter, with no aliases that I know of, replaces the switches in one of the uprights of the H with capacitors, so contains only 2 switches overall, hence 'half'. It only delivers half the voltage swing at the load as the full bridge inverter. Sometimes the two caps are small and are sized to replace the function of resonant cap C1. Sometimes the two caps are big and are used also also as the DC bus. Sometimes intermediate values are used, in addition to MMC and PSU bus caps.
If D14 to D18 are specified as fast diodes, they are there to back up the operation of the body diodes. It can result in a lower forward drop, it can result in shorter reverse recovery, it does result in higher device capacitance. There's no clear advantage or disadvantage in the general case, but you may find an advantage with specific devices at specific powers and switching frequencies. Some people insist on using them, some abhor them.
Here D14 to D18 are specified as TVS, which are used to clamp inadvertent spikes from destroying the switches. They will add extra capacitance. Again there's no consensus on whether they are always a good idea. To use them takes up extra space, and they won't protect well unless they are very close to the device. That really depends on your mindset, do you want a stripped-down H bridge that's cheaper and slightly faster but more fragile, or the opposite of all those things.
D6 to D13 are to protect the gates, most are specified only to +/- 20v. In theory, if you have limited the drive to the GDT, you should not have excess gate volts. In practice, whoopsies do happen. If you make the GDT's removable, then putting D6 to D13 directly on the devices protects the gates from static charge accumulation when they are not being shorted by the GDTs. They are cheap, and a good insurance policy, most people use them.
In a full bridge, both ends of the load are equally 'hot', but the end of the primary connected to the MMC is much hotter. Tap the CT into either end of the load, but not the MMC-primary connection. In a half bridge, if your caps are the PSU caps, that point will be cold and the best one to use. If your caps are the MMC, then that point will be very hot and will be the worst one to use.
Registered Member #54503
Joined: Sun Feb 22 2015, 10:35PM
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 288
Dr. Slack wrote ...
That's an 'H-bridge' inverter, aka 'full H-bridge', aka 'full bridge', aka 'bridge' inverter. The four switching devices and the load make up the 5 short lines of the letter 'H'.
A 'half bridge' inverter, with no aliases that I know of, replaces the switches in one of the uprights of the H with capacitors, so contains only 2 switches overall, hence 'half'. It only delivers half the voltage swing at the load as the full bridge inverter. Sometimes the two caps are small and are sized to replace the function of resonant cap C1. Sometimes the two caps are big and are used also also as the DC bus. Sometimes intermediate values are used, in addition to MMC and PSU bus caps.
If D14 to D18 are specified as fast diodes, they are there to back up the operation of the body diodes. It can result in a lower forward drop, it can result in shorter reverse recovery, it does result in higher device capacitance. There's no clear advantage or disadvantage in the general case, but you may find an advantage with specific devices at specific powers and switching frequencies. Some people insist on using them, some abhor them.
Here D14 to D18 are specified as TVS, which are used to clamp inadvertent spikes from destroying the switches. They will add extra capacitance. Again there's no consensus on whether they are always a good idea. To use them takes up extra space, and they won't protect well unless they are very close to the device. That really depends on your mindset, do you want a stripped-down H bridge that's cheaper and slightly faster but more fragile, or the opposite of all those things.
D6 to D13 are to protect the gates, most are specified only to +/- 20v. In theory, if you have limited the drive to the GDT, you should not have excess gate volts. In practice, whoopsies do happen. If you make the GDT's removable, then putting D6 to D13 directly on the devices protects the gates from static charge accumulation when they are not being shorted by the GDTs. They are cheap, and a good insurance policy, most people use them.
In a full bridge, both ends of the load are equally 'hot', but the end of the primary connected to the MMC is much hotter. Tap the CT into either end of the load, but not the MMC-primary connection. In a half bridge, if your caps are the PSU caps, that point will be cold and the best one to use. If your caps are the MMC, then that point will be very hot and will be the worst one to use.
Thanks, that answers alot!
Here i was thinking people were referring to a half bridge when they mention H-Bridge, so its good to have that clarified! :)
I assume C2 and C3 are for protection from primary strikes?
I believe that most people nowdays connect a 68nf cap from the negative rail to ground for this, but there appears to be many different views on this.
Thats good to know what those diodes are for and will help me with my design considerations.
C2 and C3 are snubber capacitors which are typically polypropylene film caps and placed as closed as possible across the + and - bus terminals of the IGBTs. Many large IGBT modules come in half bridge configuration each, where one terminal is typically connected to V+, one to V- and one as the middle junction. If you look at my DRSSTC 3 , these 'C2 and C3' equivalent caps are the black boxy caps I place directly over the terminals of the IGBTs. More information here:
Primary strike protection is a different issue and connects to RF ground which is different from V negative. In that case, a bypass capacitor is typically used to connect one of the V+ or V- or both rails to ground via a good quality capacitor. This provides an 'easy' path for the streamer energy to travel to ground if it hits the primary circuit. I use 68nF or 100nF 2kV caps just because I have a bunch of them lying around.
Registered Member #54503
Joined: Sun Feb 22 2015, 10:35PM
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 288
loneoceans wrote ...
C2 and C3 are snubber capacitors which are typically polypropylene film caps and placed as closed as possible across the + and - bus terminals of the IGBTs. Many large IGBT modules come in half bridge configuration each, where one terminal is typically connected to V+, one to V- and one as the middle junction. If you look at my DRSSTC 3 , these 'C2 and C3' equivalent caps are the black boxy caps I place directly over the terminals of the IGBTs. More information here:
Primary strike protection is a different issue and connects to RF ground which is different from V negative. In that case, a bypass capacitor is typically used to connect one of the V+ or V- or both rails to ground via a good quality capacitor. This provides an 'easy' path for the streamer energy to travel to ground if it hits the primary circuit. I use 68nF or 100nF 2kV caps just because I have a bunch of them lying around.
Thanks for your reply Loneoceans, yes im totally forgetting about the snubber caps! That reminds me i need to find some aerovox RBPS caps soon.
I was going to email you about this earlier, I have been in contact with you a bit over the last 6 months :)
I see your coil doesnt have the diodes discussed on the inverter, i suspect that the only crucial ones are the ones that go across each 5.1K resistor to each gate.
With proper care taken, i dont expect my Universal driver to put over voltage on the gates.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Yes, 'H' is not an abbreviation for 'half'.
One further possible source of confusion. Loneoceans referred to pair of series connected devices in one package. I have seen these series-connected things referred to by the manufacturer as a 'full half-bridge', aaaaaagh!
... 5.1 ohm resistor, you'll have a lot of trouble with 5.1k
Registered Member #54503
Joined: Sun Feb 22 2015, 10:35PM
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 288
Dr. Slack wrote ...
Yes, 'H' is not an abbreviation for 'half'.
One further possible source of confusion. Loneoceans referred to pair of series connected devices in one package. I have seen these series-connected things referred to by the manufacturer as a 'full half-bridge', aaaaaagh!
... 5.1 ohm resistor, you'll have a lot of trouble with 5.1k
OK, thanks for that! Ive been learning so much its not funny. Loneoceans has also been a great help, i cant wait to upload some photos when the coil is up and running!
Registered Member #30656
Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
I believe the current consensus is that the TVS diodes across the bridge don't do a lot (though no harm either) - it's much better to put the effort into bus layout etc. The diodes on the gates however are a very easy and cheap insurance policy.
Getting those Aerovox RBPS snubbers (or equivalent) in NZ is a bit of a pain unfortunately. I ended up using them for my MMC too, so I got a big (>50) lot of them from CTR surplus for ~$100 USD, but shipping via NZ post's freight forwarding service doubled the cost (CTR doesn't ship internationally).
Edit: I'll second the comment about loneoceans - he's made some great info/writeups/photos available to the TC community!
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Here is a crude illustration of what Dr Slack said, about why it's called an H-bridge topology. The same schematic also has a FULL wave BRIDGE rectifier.
(the large type is 72 point Garamond Bold, enlarged to 270% in MS Paint)
Registered Member #54503
Joined: Sun Feb 22 2015, 10:35PM
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 288
Hydron wrote ...
I believe the current consensus is that the TVS diodes across the bridge don't do a lot (though no harm either) - it's much better to put the effort into bus layout etc. The diodes on the gates however are a very easy and cheap insurance policy.
Getting those Aerovox RBPS snubbers (or equivalent) in NZ is a bit of a pain unfortunately. I ended up using them for my MMC too, so I got a big (>50) lot of them from CTR surplus for ~$100 USD, but shipping via NZ post's freight forwarding service doubled the cost (CTR doesn't ship internationally).
Edit: I'll second the comment about loneoceans - he's made some great info/writeups/photos available to the TC community!
They are cheap on ebay, but cost 10X what they are worth to send them which is stupid ($40 post.)
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.