If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
OK, so an ideal circuit for a coilgun would have:
a) the ability to drive *lots* of stages b) put high(ish) voltage across the coils on and... c) reverse the voltage across them to turn them off again ASAP d) carry and be able to drive lots of current e) computer controlled (arduino or whatever) f) as cheap as possible and no cheaper ;)
OK, so my idea to do this is:
a) have an inverter (a 2 phase inverter), That's 3 half bridges with IGBTs or FETS. powered from an array of electrolytic caps.
b) a big crosspoint switch using well snubbed TRIACs for each row and column, one for each phase. So 12 TRIACS can handle 6*6=36 coils, 24 TRIACS, 12 for each phase = 72 stages.
TRIACS have decent current and volts. You can also run them in parallel to double their current capacity. They also switch themselves off when the current goes to zero (if they're well snubbed); and you can put negative volts through them from the inverter, which means the coils can be switched off much faster.
I've actually already got this circuitry running for another application, with less TRIACs, so I basically know it works.
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
what do you mean by switching the coils off by applying a reverse voltage? surely that would just reverse the field and the force would still act on the projectile.
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
No, when you switch a coil on (put volts across it to ramp up the current) you have to switch it off again shortly afterwards to avoid suckback. If you use a half bridge, then you're applying zero volts across the coil and the current decays. It's much faster to apply negative volts across the coil until the current decays through zero amps.
If you're powering it through one or more TRIACs, when it transitions through zero current, the TRIAC will automatically disconnect it (provided your snubbing is working).
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
wouldn't that cause a massively high current to flow through the TRIAC (about four times that of the current caused whilst the coil turns on)? wouldn't this waste twice as much power than letting the voltage die away?
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
You might want to reconsider assertion a). Complexity carries a cost. I wouldn't design for more than, say, 5 stages before laboratory evidence that I could do better with 5 than with 4.
How are you going to manage the gate drives for an XY crosspoint in which the voltage between X and Y rails reverses? It might be enlightening to simulate a 2x2 case, even though that uses just as many switches as 1x4. I have used a Spice model of basic SCR (made out of BJT's), found on the Internet. You might be able to find something similar for a basic triac.
What would triacs do that you couldn't do with SCR's, if the current pulse in each coil is to be unipolar?
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
hen918 wrote ...
wouldn't that cause a massively high current to flow through the TRIAC (about four times that of the current caused whilst the coil turns on)? wouldn't this waste twice as much power than letting the voltage die away?
(if I am understanding correctly)
No, the inductors have huge inductance, so the current doesn't change at all quickly; it just can't it's an LR low pass filter.
What does happen is you get voltage swings as the inverter half bridges switch on and off, the Ldi/dt creates voltages.
But inverters get that anyway, that's why there's beefy reverse/clamp diodes across the FET/IGBTs. As they conduct they recharge the diode on the DC bus, so far from wasting power it actually puts it back where you want it.
klugesmith wrote ...
You might want to reconsider assertion a). Complexity carries a cost. I wouldn't design for more than, say, 5 stages before laboratory evidence that I could do better with 5 than with 4.
It turns out it doesn't matter a lot, the TRIACs are the inexpensive bit. It turns out that I already have a board that could drive 9 coils.
klugesmith wrote ...
How are you going to manage the gate drives for an XY crosspoint in which the voltage between X and Y rails reverses? It might be enlightening to simulate a 2x2 case, even though that uses just as many switches as 1x4. I have used a Spice model of basic SCR (made out of BJT's), found on the Internet. You might be able to find something similar for a basic triac.
Yeah, I've already modelled them, and even built them. It wasn't intended for this, but I just realised it would probably work.
klugesmith wrote ... What would triacs do that you couldn't do with SCR's, if the current pulse in each coil is to be unipolar?
They're cheap and fairly easy to drive, and they're pretty robust.
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
what you have, in effect, is an inductor and a resistor in series. When the power is cut to the inductor, the voltage will swing negative anyway, applying a negative voltage to that is only going to exacerbate it.
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
You get twice the volts across the inductor, so it switches off twice as fast.
I also put some reasonably huge clamp diodes on the side of the triac that's connected to the coil. Otherwise I found I had some nasty resonances with the snubber and other potential issues during turn off. They don't need heatsinks, but they take large currents.
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
BigBad wrote ...
You get twice the volts across the inductor, so it switches off twice as fast.
I also put some reasonably huge clamp diodes on the side of the triac that's connected to the coil. Otherwise I found I had some nasty resonances with the snubber and other potential issues during turn off. They don't need heatsinks, but they take large currents.
sorry if I sound obnoxious, but if you have diodes in parallel with your TRIAC, you might as well use thyristors.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.