Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 32
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
lokeycmos (43)


Next birthdays
05/24 Simon Barsinister (63)
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Boats/Submarines and the HP of the motor to speed of the craft

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Andy
Sat Dec 06 2014, 04:38AM Print
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
I'm trying to build a kontik, its pretty much a submarine that takes a longline fishing line out to a certain distance from shore then stop. I started a thread about control(direction finding, hopefully cheaper than GPS), but the data on the internet is hard to find out, what the HP of the electrical motor needs to be to move the sub through the water.
On one website they said 1hp for 10kg of displacement as a rough figure.
How did they work that out, is it just drag, inertia etc?

Cheers
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat Dec 06 2014, 10:22AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
In the limit of zero speed, you need zero power.

How fast do you want to go?

You probably need the capability to go at least twice as fast as the strongest current you expect to encounter, so that you always have some control authority.

Then with your minimum target speed settled, you can start to google for drag coefficient, and use that through frontal area and total wetted area to some estimates of power needed.
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat Dec 06 2014, 03:58PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
For displacement vessels, as opposed to planing vessels, there is a formula for finding the most efficient speed (for surface vessels). The formula is the square root of the waterline length (in feet) is equal to the most efficient speed in Knots. For example, a 50 foot vessel will have an optimum speed of ~7 knots.

Once you try to push the vessel faster, the power required rises dramatically. I don't know if this also applies to subs, but I assume either this principle, or a similar one holds.

There is also an optimum formula for designing the front of the sub, which I forget, but which explains the strange shape of the front end of nuclear subs, and also of some supertankers.

Link2

Back to top
Andy
Sat Dec 06 2014, 08:43PM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Do these numbers look right Link2 ,with a rought coffeinect of 0.5

Area = 0.15m2
Speed = 3m/s

Fd = 371.25kg
P(watts) = 3341.25

Using 28 motorcycle batterys with two induction motors and a VFD about 20amp/hours at 340volt 0.5 DOD 3.4kwh, so about 1 hour run time.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Mon Dec 08 2014, 12:04AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
GPS does not give direction like a magnetic compass, but rather measures distance over time to get the direction of travel.

There are several dozen GPS flight path control systems for RC planes that should work with minimal hardware changes.
Link2

Note that depending on the region many rules regarding fishing gear sometimes carry a large fine.
...besides the ethical ramifications it is unwise to copy another innovator's products.
Back to top
Andy
Tue Dec 09 2014, 02:12AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Thanks Carbon Rod

Note that depending on the region many rules regarding fishing gear sometimes carry a large fine.
...besides the ethical ramifications it is unwise to copy another innovator's products.
Longline fishing has a max of 25 hooks per length, but I think it might have dropped down to 20. What do you mean by copy another innovators product?, konitiks have been around for 200-300 years, I'm sure the owner or grandchildren would have passed away.

Sorry I'm not making a product, just gaining knowledge in subs, and catch some fish.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Tue Dec 09 2014, 06:48AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
A small trolling motor would likely cost less than a Diver Propulsion Vehicle prop. Assuming a roughly perpendicular to shoreline path, one may prefer a tethered inverse-gear rudder steering system controlled by simple surface line tension and a tiller eye linkage. One could use the same line to trip a thruster cutoff (similar to a lamp switch) when it is taut enough at a specified line length.
Additionally, using two feeder spools on a ceramic bullseye could allow you to cycle the lines several times without returning the float to shore. For example, letting both ends of the line out would increase travel distance, braking both would stop the vessel prop, and reeling in one (baited) while letting out the other (clean) would cycle the line back to shore without tangling. Remember to use a natural cork plug in the hull so if your gear is lost it will sink eventually.

A few low cost units may prove more effective than some relatively costly AUV.
wink
Back to top
Steve Conner
Tue Dec 09 2014, 10:33AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
1hp for 10kg of displacement would be nice, but you can get away with a lot less. The sculling boat I use is about 27ft long and displaces something like 110kg with me in it. I am good for about 1/2hp and my speed in calm conditions is about 4m/s or a little under 8 knots. Oddly this is well over Ash's rule of thumb for optimum hull speed of a 27ft boat.

A long, thin torpedo shaped submarine would probably have much the same drag characteristics as a long narrow boat. At these low speeds the drag is mainly due to friction between water and hull, so I don't think it matters if it is floating on top of the water or submerged in it.

For the fishing application you suggested, the drag of the line would have to be considered, as well as the force needed to keep station against winds and currents. That may well end up more important than the hull drag.

If the fishing application doesn't work out, you can always sell it to some Mexican smugglers.
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Dec 09 2014, 01:34PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve Conner wrote ...

1hp for 10kg of displacement would be nice, but you can get away with a lot less. The sculling boat I use is about 27ft long and displaces something like 110kg with me in it. I am good for about 1/2hp and my speed in calm conditions is about 4m/s or a little under 8 knots. Oddly this is well over Ash's rule of thumb for optimum hull speed of a 27ft boat.

A long, thin torpedo shaped submarine would probably have much the same drag characteristics as a long narrow boat. At these low speeds the drag is mainly due to friction between water and hull, so I don't think it matters if it is floating on top of the water or submerged in it.

For the fishing application you suggested, the drag of the line would have to be considered, as well as the force needed to keep station against winds and currents. That may well end up more important than the hull drag.

If the fishing application doesn't work out, you can always sell it to some Mexican smugglers.

The calculation I gave is 'very' approximate, but is pretty good for conventionally shaped vessels. There are plenty of other factors, and other methods. Kayaks are always used as an example of non-conformity. A vessel that has very little in the way of wake will exceed the speed calculated using this very basic formula, but the longer the waterline length, the faster the vessel will go. This is why ocean going liners got bigger and bigger, so they could cross the Atlantic faster.
Back to top
2Spoons
Tue Dec 09 2014, 09:28PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
something like this? Link2

These guys have been around a while. The specs on their system should tell you if your calcs are in the ballpark.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.