Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 86
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Bridge questions

Move Thread LAN_403
dexter
Wed Dec 03 2014, 08:54PM Print
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
I'm building a small but powerful SSTC and because my silicon graveyard is full i want to build the bridge as sturdy as possible. So i was thinking on using ultrafast diodes to protect the transistors, one in series with each transistor and another in antiparallel with both the transistor and first diode.

1st question: Is it worthed doing this for IGBT's because i only seen it done for mosfets?

2nd question: Does it mater where i place the series diode? In series with the collector/drain or in series with emitter/source?
The arrangement i've seen so far is the fallowing:

1417638653 42796 FT0 Bridge1

but the problem with this arrangement is that it complicates the PCB layout to much
Can this arrangement be used instead?

1417638870 42796 FT0 Bridge2

with this arrangement the PCB layout will be easier to work with all because of the pinouts of the parts

3rd question: is heat-sinking required for D3 and D4 (all dides are MUR1560) (D1 and D2 will be on the same heatsink with the transistors) because i used them without any heatsink in antiparallel with both mosfet's and IGBT's in several SSTC's with no isue
Back to top
Sigurthr
Thu Dec 04 2014, 01:55AM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
It is used so frequently with mosfets because mosfet construction forces the creation of a slow "body" diode. You want to blockade that body diode out of function, and prevent it from ever being reverse biased.

Not all IGBTs have a co-pack diode in them, and often this diode is as good as any schottky you will be able to find, so the "diode blockade" as I call it isn't required for use or beneficial with IGBTs that have an adequate co-pack diode. If your IGBTs have crappy co-pack diodes you'll need the full blockade (series and antiparallel), and if they have no co-pack diode then you only need the antiparallel (freewheeling).

You can technically use the series schottky between emitter/source and -bus/pri but then you have a diode drop that will be seen by Vgs, complicating and hindering gate drive. It is better to place the series diode on the drain/collector side.

It is my experience that at least in Tesla Coil work, the freewheeling (antiparallel) diodes do not need to be heatsinked as they won't be conducting significant current, but I think there are some applications for bridges where they will indeed require heatsinking.

FWIW I've built tons of bridges as you show it in the first diagram (series schottky on drain side) and they are indeed bulletproof when used with adequate and clean gate drive. I've even driven highly capacitive low-impedance loads (did not make anything upstream or downstream happy!) but the bridge didn't skip a beat (figuratively). It complained, of course, but kept on ticking.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.