Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 64
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Practical way of getting a stable voltage from a supercapacitor bank?

Move Thread LAN_403
Artlav
Wed Jul 02 2014, 09:11PM Print
Artlav Registered Member #8120 Joined: Thu Nov 15 2012, 06:06PM
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 94
Supercapacitors discharge linearly.
If a bank of them have a 30V max voltage, then 90% of it's energy will be within 10V to 30V range.

So, to use that energy one should be able to accept a wide input voltage.
But most devices use a fixed input voltage - 5V, 12V, 24V, 48V, etc.

Three system design options here.

One - step down.
Your working voltage should be below the 10% mark.
As a rule of thumb, multiply it by 3 to get the bank's max voltage.
Easy to make - buck converters are among the most efficient ones.
Disadvantage - more caps in series needed.

Two - step up.
Your working voltage is above the max voltage of the pack.
Not so easy to make, since step-up converters are not as easy or efficient, and there will be large currents at the input.
Also, you can easily go over the voltage limits of cheap devices, needing more expensive solutions - i.e. powering an LED is easier from 12V than from 48V.

Three - convert to a voltage in the middle.
For 10V to 30V it's 24V, a voltage easy enough to work with.
Problem is - i have no idea what sort of converter can do this, at decent efficiency and 100W range of power.


So, here is the question - how do you design a converter that can take 10V to 30V, and give out 24V at about 100W, with decent efficiency?

Boost to something like 32V, then buck to 24V works, but efficiency is in 50% range.
I also tried looking at SEPIC.
It works, but i can't figure out how to get more than a couple watts out of it.

Any ideas?
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Thu Jul 03 2014, 12:29AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
You may be able to get a regulated output. However, the nonlinear rate of discharge may strain the super-cap as it suffers a rapid increase in current draw as regulator Vin drops below Vout. Excluding the increasing conversion losses may also pose a problem.

The lm5118 has a fairly decent conversion efficiency if the correct inductor size if chosen:
Link2

a $7 for a 15Watt buck boost module with current regulation for testing the design:
Link2

Back to top
Patrick
Thu Jul 03 2014, 04:55AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I have a great deal of experience with super and ultra caps which use the Helmholtz effect, starting way back in the ancient year of 1997.

But for what purpose is this device needed?
Back to top
Artlav
Thu Jul 03 2014, 02:54PM
Artlav Registered Member #8120 Joined: Thu Nov 15 2012, 06:06PM
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 94
Carbon_Rod wrote ...

You may be able to get a regulated output. However, the nonlinear rate of discharge may strain the super-cap as it suffers a rapid increase in current draw as regulator Vin drops below Vout. Excluding the increasing conversion losses may also pose a problem.
The caps are rated for 200A continuous, which is 2kW at 10V. I only want 100-200W or so.
Not a problem.

Carbon_Rod wrote ...
The lm5118 has a fairly decent conversion efficiency if the correct inductor size if chosen
So, a buck-to-boost transition special purpose controller?
Is there a name for this?
"buck boost" gives me predominately inverting converters.

I'd love to find some chip or design that would allow parallel stacking - a converter that alone can deliver i.e. 1A at high efficiency, but that can be duplicated 10 times in parallel (without complex load balancing issues).

Patrick wrote ...
But for what purpose is this device needed?
Experimentation.
I have 12 of 3000F caps, 30WH total, and i want to figure out how to use them as energy storage, get to know the technology.

They are charged from a small solar panel, and should provide a stable voltage (24V?) to some LED lighting and an AC inverter.

Pieces needed:
Charger - straightforward. CC, CV from 32V, boosted from a panel.
Balancing and monitoring - trickier, but LiPo stack solutions exist and fit the task. MAX14920 + Atmega328P.
Output - ?

I have already tried case 1 - buck - successfully, for 8S supercap banks to charge a cell phone (5V).
Link2
The solar panel charges the caps to 18V with a basic MPPT charger and passive balancing with zenners, and they are discharged down to 6V with a buck converter that gives out 5V.
As simple as it gets, but not always practical and common.

Now i want to try case 3, which sounds to be the most common case - the target voltage being in the middle of the discharge range.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Thu Jul 03 2014, 05:07PM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Not sure why the lm5118 URL was lost, but it is a little wide-input-range regulator switcher chip:
Link2
IIRC, the current rating of 4A in the app notes seem below the control limit older designs noted.
wink

Paralleling SMPS is an old technique:
1. Put large schottky isolation diodes on outputs (should be rated twice peak Vout)
2. load balancing by matching the exact Vout of each supply
3. control loop sharing across each sensor line

The buck boost chip will unlikely be very reliable because of the lm5118 error correction loop in cases 2 & 3. However, adjusted 2A current-regulation in the cheap LM2577+LM2596 (under $4.45 in bulk) module posted should automatically limit the asymmetry of the loading.

It may be less hassle if you can find a solid 10A output converter for under $30.
There are also numerous larger DC-DC modules available used in electric bikes that may meet your needs.

Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat Jul 05 2014, 11:21AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
It's always best to design the converter / capacitor bank so that the output voltage is either at all times higher than input voltage (and then use a boost converter) or vice versa (and use a buck converter).

If charging of the capacitor from the regulated voltage is also required, a buck-boost converter can be used (basically a half-bridge).

In most cases a simple inverter based around the UC384x IC will work. For a two-way converter (buck-boost) the TL494 can be used.
Back to top
Electra
Sat Jul 05 2014, 10:10PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156

What about a transformer based flyback converter ( it's is really two coupled inductors ), you can set the turns ratio to whatever you want then.
Discontinuous mode may be easer to design for the feedback loop.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.