Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 20
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Daniel Uhrenholt (41)


Next birthdays
11/20 stop4stuff (57)
11/20 quicksilver (69)
11/20 Paul Brodie (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Half Bridge capacitors

Move Thread LAN_403
chris_inkubate
Sat Jun 14 2014, 12:40PM Print
chris_inkubate Registered Member #46007 Joined: Wed Apr 30 2014, 08:02PM
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 36
Hi Everyone,
I am new here and looking to build a half bridge DRSSTC using a dual IGBT brick from Littlelfuse Link.

I have only some electronics skills so will be adapting schematics for my needs. I have looked at a couple of half bridge designs namely the OneTesla schematic Link and Kaizer DRSSTC 2 Link.

I notice that both these designs use a different approach for the two capacitors that tail the primary coil to the supply rail and ground (C4 & C7 on Kaizer). The Kaizer uses two 1uf MKP's and a separate 820uf of bus capacitor whereas the OneTesla looks like it utilises the bus capacitor in this role as two series 1000uf caps. From what I can see in the half bridge application these caps must form part of the primary circuit - can anyone please explain? Also is there a benefit to either of these approaches and is there any correlation to IGBT selection / current and how this is handled e.g. cap value of the MKP's?

I'm in the UK using 230V so would be looking at the moment to use a non-doubled voltage - just FW rectified line as in these.

Many Thanks for reading,
Chris
Back to top
Sigurthr
Sat Jun 14 2014, 02:06PM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
In a half bridge the primary is capacitively coupled to the bus via a capacitive divider. This blocks DC current and allows the circuit to complete when current flows in either direction across the primary.

My understanding is that the capacitive divider caps determine the impedance of the half bridge while the bus cap is the energy storage for the half bridge. That is so say you can enlarge the divider caps to the point that they also function to store energy and eliminate the bus cap, but if you size them too small you won't be utilizing much of the bus cap because the bridge will be high impedance. To that end I use ~4000uF caps for the divider and leave out a bus cap in my designs. Any wiring between bus cap and bridge imcreases impedance so by eliminating it you gain performance. Just remember effective bus capacitance is halved since the two caps are in series.
Back to top
Antonio
Sat Jun 14 2014, 02:42PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
The most usual form is the first. The second requires a higher-voltage bus capacitor and two additional ones. It avoids the high-frequency current through the bus capacitor, however. These capacitors are just for energy storage, and have little function in the primary circuit. The capacitors in the capacitive divider must have low series resistance and inductance, because the primary current passes through them.
Back to top
chris_inkubate
Sat Jun 14 2014, 02:43PM
chris_inkubate Registered Member #46007 Joined: Wed Apr 30 2014, 08:02PM
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 36
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies. That makes sense and those capacitors would also be required to conduct the full peak current of the primary circuit. If lower value separate MKP capacitors are used here then the value would be somewhat dependant on the operating frequency of the coil to keep the reactance lower? I'm thinking this as I'd likely be operating below 100KHz for the brick hence these would maybe need to be bigger than the 1uf caps in Kaizers's DRSSTC II that uses this configuration but at 320Khz so giving a 0.48ohm reactance. Maybe 4-5uf.

Thanks,
Chris
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun Jun 15 2014, 07:15AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
If the bus voltage is below 400 volts, use one electrolytic capacitor (or more in parallel). Otherwise, use two electrolytic capacitors in series (or more of these pairs in parallel). Using two series caps at lower voltages results in unnecessary high parasitic inductance. It doesn't matter where you couple the tank capacitor's other end.

P.S. The HF peak current always flows through the electrolytic caps, you can not avoid this.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.