Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 43
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
lokeycmos (43)


Next birthdays
05/24 Simon Barsinister (63)
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Growth Model Based on the Kardashev Scale

Move Thread LAN_403
Chip Fixes
Fri May 02 2014, 07:04PM Print
Chip Fixes Registered Member #3781 Joined: Sat Mar 26 2011, 02:25AM
Location:
Posts: 701
Um here's my writeup so far:

1399054683 3781 FT0 Court

I'm basically using the Kardashev scale to predict what year we will be able to maximize our consumption of Earth's energy, and thus start harvesting the sun's energy.
Unfortunately, there are only 20 known data points and I'm trying to predict the slope of several hundred points, so I made 3 graphs with the three *best* trendlines. My graphs also omit the first two data points (1980, 1981) because they are outliers.

1399056365 3781 FT0 Court

The graphs are K vs Time where x = 0 is 1981 and x = 1 is 1982 (the x axis is arbitrary since the x-intercept is unknown).
1: Exponential trendline
2: Linear trendline
3: Polynomial trendline with order 2

According to the R^2, the polynomial is the best fit, but I'm thinking the most accurate trendline will be some sort of combination between all three trendlines, maybe an average? (Although my gut tells me the exponential trendline is the most accurate of the three)
I graphed all three on the x-y plane in using WolframAlpha and got: (WolframAlpha raw data: Link2 )
1399057076 3781 FT0 Court

Where y=1 is the kardashev value of 1 which equates to the maximum Earth energy consumption of 10^16 watts.
I doubt any of the graphs are accurate past y = 0.9 because at that point I suspect the graph will turn into a polynomial of order 3 for a short period of time while Earth's civilization goes through a new 'Industrial Revolution' of sorts. From Y = 0.9 to Y = 1.1 I suspect the civilization will start building a Dyson sphere or something similar so they can start harvesting the energy of entire stars in space (beginning with our sun?).

Please discuss, and let me know if you have any suggestions or anything.

EDIT: I am planning on comparing the world population graph to my graphs at some point soon. Maybe I could use the result to make an accurate estimate of when the Earth was a Type 0 civilization? I am also curious to see how the Industrial Revolution affected everything.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri May 02 2014, 11:46PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
when we talk about all this theoretical Dyson sphere stuff, we account for solar cycles right? the 11, year cycle (for our case) we know of right?

and do we know if there are other solar cycles? perhaps 72 and/or 400 years too?
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Sat May 03 2014, 02:22AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
All life on earth only retains well under 2% of solar energy input into the system.
Change this and you will slowly destroy most ecosystems.
Back to top
Conundrum
Sat May 03 2014, 07:31AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Hmm.
Has it occurred to the Dyson sphere folks that even a high radiation star might still be useable IF all that energy is harvested and used for shielding the central equatorial regions?

Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun May 11 2014, 08:15AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I'd like to think that as a civilization gets more advanced, the energy utilisation will plateau and then maybe even go down as they realise the environmental implications of it. There are more kinds of "advancement" than just hard science fiction.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.