Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 13
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Danielle (34)


Next birthdays
07/07 MicroTesla (34)
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Rare HV to LV converter

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Antonio
Thu Apr 03 2014, 12:12AM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
Machines like this were studied in the past. The first idea was probably the "rheostatic machine" of Gaston Planté, that could charge a bank of capacitors in parallel and discharge them in series, or the opposite. Only the switches must rotate, but it's of course possible to rotate the capacitors too. I remember seing a version on Youtube, and have somewhere documents describing a similar idea. With adequate inductors, diodes, and switches efficient commutation for the charging and discharging phases can probably be obtained. A problem is how to make this work automously, without someone turning a crank.
Back to top
Andy
Thu Apr 03 2014, 05:01AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
GammaRay
Don't know about this, but the transformer can make voltage pulses, with a type of buck converter to level out the pulse to a low voltage level
1396501316 4266 FT162126 Voltage
Back to top
Yandersen
Thu Apr 03 2014, 10:24AM
Yandersen Registered Member #6944 Joined: Fri Sept 28 2012, 04:54PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 340
GammaRay, may I suspect that the demand of HV-LV transformation arised from the plan of catching the energy of a lightning bolt using the capacitive storage? ;) Did you actually managed to do that?

You may connect a chain of small LV caps in parallel to the HV bank - this way you will have many LV sources to transform. Ensure that voltages at all caps are balanced (use TVS for each cap) - all those little sources must be drained simultaneously with the same speed and have precisely the same capacitances.
F.e. use 20 caps 1KV each; then wind 20 equal isolated primaries on a huge toroidal ferrite core with just one secondary. With a step-down flyback topology, synchronously switching on all primaries at once, you will ensure the energy draining will keep all voltages on caps at the same level. Transform this into 12VDC to charge a Lead battery of a UPS, so you will get 120VAC as well. :)
Back to top
Electra
Thu Apr 03 2014, 10:22PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156
I was about to suggest the same sort of idea as Yandersen just pointed out, only using many stages of half bridges in series as the ac would be half the stage bus voltage.
The gate drives transformers would be similarly bulky as would have to isolate 20kv and have as many windings as igbts used. Even if you used the highest voltage devices you could find plus you’d still need some overhead.

While all the options seem to have been discussed from mechanical, vacuum tube or series semiconductor however you arranged them. Also it would have to work over a very wide range of voltage as the capacitor discharged. Most of the energy would be in the higher voltage end of the range, so you could just opt to operate over, for example 3:1 input voltage range.
Back to top
Thomas W
Thu Apr 03 2014, 11:42PM
Thomas W Registered Member #3324 Joined: Sun Oct 17 2010, 06:57PM
Location:
Posts: 1276
Electra wrote ...

I was about to suggest the same sort of idea as Yandersen just pointed out, only using many stages of half bridges in series as the ac would be half the stage bus voltage.
The gate drives transformers would be similarly bulky as would have to isolate 20kv and have as many windings as igbts used. Even if you used the highest voltage devices you could find plus you’d still need some overhead.

While all the options seem to have been discussed from mechanical, vacuum tube or series semiconductor however you arranged them. Also it would have to work over a very wide range of voltage as the capacitor discharged. Most of the energy would be in the higher voltage end of the range, so you could just opt to operate over, for example 3:1 input voltage range.


He could do Yandersen's ideas and use high speed optocouplers.
Back to top
Yandersen
Fri Apr 04 2014, 02:43AM
Yandersen Registered Member #6944 Joined: Fri Sept 28 2012, 04:54PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 340
Well, one for sure is that assymetrical halfbridges will be required to charge primaries as coupling factor with 20KV isolation over the core will be too bad.
Most of IC halfbridge drivers have 600V bootstrap voltage, so that will be the limit for a single stage.
As voltage range has wide bounds (0-600V), the time the primaries will build up the desired current level is not constant also (the higher the voltage, the faster the current rises). To control the charge duration without the need of controlling the voltage, we can put a shunt resistor in series with a chain of dividing caps (insert the shunt between Gnd and the "bottom" cap) - once all stages are told to start energising, the voltage drop on a shunt resistor starts to linearly rise. Once it reaches the desired value, we close all stages and wait until the portions of sucked energy will unload into the LV load (flyback topology). Then we start the charging cycle again.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Apr 04 2014, 04:25AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
I've just had a pretty simple idea, use a high value resistor and a high voltage triode to charge a capacitor bank to a pre-determined voltage, say, for arguments sake, 120V (doesn't really matter), then drive whatever load directly from that, (or use an SMPS, or whatever, to 'transform' the voltage to whatever you want.

Just keep turning on the triode to maintain the voltage in the second, low voltage, capacitor bank within the upper and lower limits (whatever you decide).

While this will require a large capacitor bank, and a HV resistor (or string), and a HV triode, it won't require the multitude of sections proposed in some of the suggestions here.

The HV resistor is just to limit the current to a reasonable level to be controlable, and the value could be reduced as the HV capacitor bank becomes depleted. (if you use a string of resistors, just switch some out of the string as the HV capacitors become depleted, maybe in conjunction with switching the triode on for longer periods.)

The current rating of the triode and the total capacitance of the low voltage bank will be dependant on the load being driven.
Back to top
Artlav
Fri Apr 04 2014, 07:15AM
Artlav Registered Member #8120 Joined: Thu Nov 15 2012, 06:06PM
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 94
Ash Small wrote ...
I've just had a pretty simple idea, use a high value resistor and a high voltage triode to charge a capacitor bank to a pre-determined voltage, say, for arguments sake, 120V (doesn't really matter), then drive whatever load directly from that, (or use an SMPS, or whatever, to 'transform' the voltage to whatever you want.
That sounds a lot like a linear regulator.
Thus, efficiency will be 120/20000, or essentially zero.
Right? Or did i read it wrong?
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Apr 04 2014, 08:13AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Artlav wrote ...

That sounds a lot like a linear regulator.
Thus, efficiency will be 120/20000, or essentially zero.
Right? Or did i read it wrong?

You may be right, maths isn't my strong point, but you'll only need sufficient resistance to make the current managable. This will depend on the amount of pulsed current that the triode can handle, and that will depend on what HV triodes are available.

As I=V/R, my calculations suggest that to limit current to, say, 100A pulses, you'd need 200 Ohms.

To limit it to 20A pulses you'd need 1kOhm.

I'd need to google available HV triodes in order to take it any further.

EDIT: I suppose you could use a series string of 20 or so mosfets, I've seen various circuits that can achieve this successfully.

EDIT: Maybe the 1/2CV^2 thing makes this less efficient than other methods, along with the resistor losses. As I said earlier, maths isn't my strong point. I generally just copy formulae into spreadsheets or whatever to do number crunching.
Back to top
Erlend^SE
Fri Apr 04 2014, 05:31PM
Erlend^SE Registered Member #1565 Joined: Wed Jun 25 2008, 09:08PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 159
Use a linear supply to bootstrap a SMPS of some kind with high voltage switching elements.

The other option is electrostatic motor of some kind/version. a plain DC motor *may* be doable, if you figure out some way to build it.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.