Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 92
  • Members: 1
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Output Transformer questions

first  2 3 4 5 
Move Thread LAN_403
Sigurthr
Tue Dec 10 2013, 08:47AM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
So now that we have info on output transformers, what about inter-stage coupling transformers? I assume similar theory holds true, but in my limited experience these seem to be far smaller cores with much less inductance. Likewise, how does one calculate the input impedance of a valve? I haven't seen it listed on datasheets , unlike the rated output impedance.
Back to top
Shrad
Tue Dec 10 2013, 09:13AM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I think the size has to do with the impedance difference, wouldn't it?

if we wanted, I'm sure we could make some small interstage transformers or phase inversion transformers out of small powdered iron toroids
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Dec 10 2013, 11:10AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Sigurthr wrote ...

So now that we have info on output transformers, what about inter-stage coupling transformers? I assume similar theory holds true, but in my limited experience these seem to be far smaller cores with much less inductance. Likewise, how does one calculate the input impedance of a valve? I haven't seen it listed on datasheets , unlike the rated output impedance.

LF interstage transformers had a relatively short history and were seldom used after about 1950, when improved capacitor technology made cheaper RC coupling convenient.

Zin: (A) Impedance is a frequency dependent property, so you will find the interelectrode capacitances - g1 - k and g1 - a - given in data sheets, allowing the Miller capacitance to be calculated for any given stage gain. (b) Zin is also dependent on the value of grid bias resistor where employed. At LF, in general purpose circuits, the input impedance on g1 without a bias resistor can be considered 'infinite' for most practical purposes.
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Dec 10 2013, 03:38PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...


LF interstage transformers had a relatively short history and were seldom used after about 1950, when improved capacitor technology made cheaper RC coupling convenient.


I'd like to point out something here, regarding pre-war and post-war amp-lifiers. After the war manufacturers started trying to economise on costs, etc, which lead to lower quality, and, eventually, miniaturization, with small, tinny sounding transistor radios.

A lot of the 'best quality' components were used in the pre-war years, and the use of these was slowly phased out in the drive to cut costs.

Just my 2 cents' worth.
Back to top
Sigurthr
Tue Dec 10 2013, 03:52PM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
Ahh, interesting. I had assumed they were very high Zin by design (high Zout, low Zin is the opposite of an ideal amplifier) but didn't know if there was a certain figure aimed for when they designed the impedance matching and interstage transformers.

So I wonder what my earlier failures with interstage transformer coupling were due to. Until I had a real interstage transformer fall into my lap it seemed like I would need many more than two stages to reach a couple watts of output. I remade my earlier circuit exactly but used a real interstage transformer and two of the same triodes were more than enough gain. I guess it could come down to the step down ratio of the transformers used but I'm pretty sure I tried a 1:1 as well, though I think it was only 1900ohms, perhaps still too low to transfer power to an infinity load.

Is there a proper means of determining anode bias resistor values for use in capacitor coupling of valves for tubes whose datasheets do not list suggested anode resistor values? For example; I tried capacitor coupling of UX-226 triodes, and while I was able to get it to work poorly I was merely guessing at values. I know that for capacitively coupled valves the anode resistor forms the voltage divider that determines the operating range of the output. The lower value Ra is the larger the voltage swing seen by Ca between cutoff and full conduction, but Ra had to be at least the value of valve's output impedance from my experiments. In MOSFET capacitor coupling I've always set drain resistors to merely limit the maximum current through the MOSFET as saturation is basically a dead short, but these triodes have such a high output impedance that at their maximum B+ anode current or dissipation isn't a concern.

Thanks for answering all these questions, I know they must seem very basic, but it is hard to find info about valve implementation and design these days.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Dec 10 2013, 10:44PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Sigurthr wrote ...


So I wonder what my earlier failures with interstage transformer coupling were due to. Until I had a real interstage transformer fall into my lap it seemed like I would need many more than two stages to reach a couple watts of output. I remade my earlier circuit exactly but used a real interstage transformer and two of the same triodes were more than enough gain. I guess it could come down to the step down ratio of the transformers used but I'm pretty sure I tried a 1:1 as well, though I think it was only 1900ohms, perhaps still too low to transfer power to an infinity load.

The triode-output pentode - a triode and and an output pentode contained in one envelope, such as ECL80/PCL80, ECL86/PCL86/UCL86, dominated domestic audio applications from the mid fifties until the end of the valve era. Here is a good quality design using ECL86: [/quote1386713960]

If more gain is needed at the front end than can be provided by a triode, a pentode would be used, but average quality radios and record players used the ECL8* series in their millions, while TVs used the functionally identical PCL8* series designed for series connected heaters in TV sets to cut out the need for an expensive heater transformer. Think of a triode having useful gain of up to 100, and a pentode up to a thousand, as a very broad outline. In a word, you should be able to make do with a triode and pentode as AF amplifiers for most domestic purposes!


Sigurthr wrote ...


Is there a proper means of determining anode bias resistor values for use in capacitor coupling of valves for tubes whose datasheets do not list suggested anode resistor values? For example; I tried capacitor coupling of UX-226 triodes, and while I was able to get it to work poorly I was merely guessing at values. I know that for capacitively coupled valves the anode resistor forms the voltage divider that determines the operating range of the output. The lower value Ra is the larger the voltage swing seen by Ca between cutoff and full conduction, but Ra had to be at least the value of valve's output impedance from my experiments. In MOSFET capacitor coupling I've always set drain resistors to merely limit the maximum current through the MOSFET as saturation is basically a dead short, but these triodes have such a high output impedance that at their maximum B+ anode current or dissipation isn't a concern.

I will try to answer the rest of your question when I have more time tomorrow,
Back to top
Sigurthr
Wed Dec 11 2013, 03:35AM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
Proud Mary wrote ...

The triode-output pentode - a triode and and an output pentode contained in one envelope, such as ECL80/PCL80, ECL86/PCL86/UCL86, dominated domestic audio applications from the mid fifties until the end of the valve era. Here is a good quality design using ECL86: [/quote1386713960]

If more gain is needed at the front end than can be provided by a triode, a pentode would be used, but average quality radios and record players used the ECL8* series in their millions, while TVs used the functionally identical PCL8* series designed for series connected heaters in TV sets to cut out the need for an expensive heater transformer. Think of a triode having useful gain of up to 100, and a pentode up to a thousand, as a very broad outline. In a word, you should be able to make do with a triode and pentode as AF amplifiers for most domestic purposes!

I will try to answer the rest of your question when I have more time tomorrow,


Thank you, many times over! Invaluable info here, even without the link to the ECL86. I had no idea the gain of a pentode was SO much higher than that of a triode. I'll have to read up on how to use a pentode, I'm clueless about the actual usage of the other two screens! I have two beam power pentodes left over from an old ham radio; one I've mucked around with by running it in triode mode, hehe. The gain of it in triode mode is even less than that of the UX-226 triode.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Dec 11 2013, 09:30AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Here's the link to the ECL86 amplifier that I forgot to add above: Link2

The price of NOS ECL86s on ebay has gone through the roof, but you can still buy PCL86 quite cheaply because it has a 13.3V heater intended for TVs.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Wed Dec 11 2013, 07:25PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
I enjoyed the article, nice little amplifier,
the output transformer seems key to this project,
almost as good as an LM380.


the rustling sound is me donning a flame-proof suit

P.S. I think it's good that knowledge of thermionics is kept alive and may have new uses
also, I am amazed by the super-cheap class-d PAM8403 stereo amplifier performance
powering speakers from a single cell (Lithium) or 3W/channel @5v
e.g. Link2 under GBP1 including postage from China ......

sorry to diverge from the thread, waiting for output transformer discussion .......
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Dec 11 2013, 08:48PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Sulaiman wrote ...

I enjoyed the article, nice little amplifier,
the output transformer seems key to this project,

I think having an O/P transformer of the right spec will make all the difference between very mediocre performance and something really rather good considering the simplicity of the design.

The problem with old old stock - recycled - transformers, is that those made in the greatest number for use with ECL86 in cheap radios and TVs were made to a price. There was no FM to show up the weaknesses of poor bandwidth, and people's expectations of TV sound were low. Cabinets more often than not buzzed and boomed in sympathy with loud passages of music, and audio bandwidth had to be kept below 10 kHz in 405-line TV to keep out the 10,125 Hz line frequency, a continuous whine you could hear distinctly anyway, because of magnetostriction in the LOPT core.

Back to top
first  2 3 4 5 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.