Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 66
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Class E audio modulation--question

Move Thread LAN_403
kiat
Sat Apr 27 2013, 02:32AM Print
kiat Registered Member #2115 Joined: Fri May 08 2009, 01:17PM
Location: Singapore
Posts: 46
Hi everyone,

As detailed on Richie's site and a few others, the final class E power amplifier has a relatively narrow bandwidth and thus frequency modulation is not recommended.

Instead, modulation of the high level +150V of the power amplifier itself is recommended.

However, the issue is, that in either case, modulation works by changing the size of the corona/streamers produced. And regardless of whichever modulation route you take -- whether you use FM or high level AM, you're still going to get a changing f0 due to different instantaneous levels of corona detuning.

Simply put: Assuming high level AM affects the coil's f0 as much as directly using FM (does it?), then why not just use FM directly?

Thanks!
Kiat
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Apr 27 2013, 08:30AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well there is one important difference. Using high level AM, you can tune for efficient operation at high power. The circuit might go out of tune at lower powers, but these correspond to low DC bus voltages. On the other hand, with FM you will be driving the circuit out of tune at full DC bus voltage most of the time. The energy dissipated due to hard switching is proportional to the square of the voltage, so the second scenario has a lot more scope for blowing things up.

Also, if using AM, you're free to vary the drive frequency at the same time, to whatever gives the best switching conditions. I'm not sure this is very useful in practice though, as what really matters is the tuning of the Tesla resonator relative to the final amp's output network, and most people seem to use fixed-frequency drive for their Class-E coils anyway.
Back to top
kiat
Mon Apr 29 2013, 06:06AM
kiat Registered Member #2115 Joined: Fri May 08 2009, 01:17PM
Location: Singapore
Posts: 46
Hi Steve
Thanks for pointing that out,i had overlooked the fact that losses were =1/2 C V^2 f

Was thinking about some other low-level modulation methods which are more elegent than a high level AM/Class H modulator.
Another drive method that allows modulation without touching the DC Bus is the double ended arrangement, using outphasing of one PA relative to the other to control power throughput (Max. power @ 180deg, minimum at 0 deg).
(I think this is in Richie's site somewhere). In this case, the bus voltage would be constant at the full DC bus voltage. However, the frequency would still change with different depths of modulation and so losses will be as bad as using a FM, when using a PLL to track frequency/? Should we just scrap the PLL and use a fixed frequency drive?

Also with a double ended arrangement the load presented to each Class E amplifier is variable, is the final Class E power stag dependent on load impedance?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.