If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #8497
Joined: Tue Dec 04 2012, 06:24PM
Location:
Posts: 74
I have no documentation or pictures of my idea, so you'll have to bear with me whilst I attempt to describe it.
From a traditional basic CG system, there are 3 components: Capacitor, Switch, Coil.
Say now, that the coil has contacts at the very beginning of the wrapping, the very middle of the wrapping, and the end of the wrap - something like this:
||>->->->->->->->->||Layer 4 ----------Terminal Contact B ||<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<||Layer 3 ||>->->->->->->->->||Layer 2 ----------Terminal Contact X ||<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<||Layer 1 ----------Terminal Contact A ------------------------------------Barrel -----
-------------------------------Barrel ||<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<||Layer 1 ||>->->->->->->->->||Layer 2 ||<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<||Layer 3 ||>->->->->->->->->||Layer 4
Terminals A and B would be your traditional CG wrapping start and end points. Terminal X is 'exactly' halfway through the length of the winding.
In this setup, the coil would conduct current (discharging the capacitor with IGBT/SCR) until the projectile has passed thru the center of the coil. At this point, a second SCR (think half-bridge / energy recovery systems) opens at terminal X leading to the positive post of a stageII capacitor.
I don't know how to model a non-ideal inductor such as this in any computer simulation software.
And this is easier than just using non-polar caps? And why to start from the middle of the coil (X) instead of the normal end (B)? Pretty crazy. I doubt this has any benefits.
You know what? No matter which kind of woodoo you will try to do out of a single coil, many small coils operating in a simple way will still perform better - guaranteed. So it is better to concentrate on switching mechanism between coils rather than fetishing around single coil. Just stuck with the best coil shape (length=inner diameter, outer =3*inner diameter) and go ahead increasing the number of coils. If/when room-temp superconductors will be invented, coils will turn into single-layer coils, but until then solution is found already.
To achieve the highest efficiency possible, coilgun must be composed of many small coils located as close to each other as possible, which are turned on and off as fast as possible, maintaining a constant current and returning unused energy back into source when turned off. Projectile must be as short as possible (I found that length less than diameter is technically hard to move through the barrel).
The coilgun of my dream is a cap-driven halfbridge with current control and optical triggering via optosensor wires going through the holes radially drilled in the iron washers separating each of two adjacent coils. I don't think any non-standard coil magic can turn a coilgun into something more efficient as the one roughly described above.
If you buy from chinese on e-bay, you can get electrolithics many times cheaper. What about characteristics? ESR, ESL, lifetime, ripple current, repolarization capability, maximum voltage, e.t.c. The ONLY benefit of electrolitics is higher energy density. But comparing the efficiency of transfer of that energy to the coil during the shot... Non-polars are just born for coilgun. If you need 1kJ to accelerate a piece of nail to 30m/s with electrolithics, than compare it with 54J for 54m/s given by 3pc of my non-polars. Those cost me $60. How much you would spend on 1kJ of electrolithics?
Registered Member #1451
Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
I hear you mention your coilgun built with non-polars, do you think you could start a thread with pictures and detailed description? Such a high performing device would be a great asset for teaching coilgun theory around here.
Haha! Not yet. I'm working on portable 16-stages version of this with 11mm caliber to make it look presentable. The unfinished 6-stage is about to be disassembled as it holds half of the caps I have in it. The main reason is that I've discovered ideal coil shape too late, and the iron fender washers of required dimensions for 9.4mm caliber do not exist, while for 11mm I'm going to use 32mm external to 12.7mm internal diameters thick iron washers which are the main part of the separative coil blocks. I will also change the shape of the projectile from plain cylinder to something more bullet-looking - this requires to rebuild all coils anyway. The flaw of the current small version is a weak 5-min-made case which is falling apart, so increase in power will brake it. Another not-constructive-related reason is that efficiency is promising to be slightly better. Probably, I will try to redesign the charger to give it more power. Give me a pot of mana and time. Here is the last picture of the first recuperational coilgun prototype for the history:
Registered Member #4659
Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
right now I'm working on a coilgun that doesn't have any capacitors at all. It just hooks up to the power supply. Also it doesn't use semiconductors! Each stage is triggered by a mechanical switch that protrudes into the barrel.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.