Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 77
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

So I found this on the internet... Hundreds of levitating balls!

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
BigBad
Wed Nov 14 2012, 02:27AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
The biggest problem is probably pulling the balls out the box to start with; you would need a many tesla strong field for that.

You might be able to use a superconducting coil; but fuck knows how you stop the balls just slamming into the magnet; I'm not an expert on superconducting coils, but I don't think they're very off-and-on able; although turning them off once isn't a problem.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Nov 14 2012, 03:18AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
BigBad wrote ...

The biggest problem is probably pulling the balls out the box to start with; you would need a many tesla strong field for that.

You might be able to use a superconducting coil; but fuck knows how you stop the balls just slamming into the magnet; I'm not an expert on superconducting coils, but I don't think they're very off-and-on able; although turning them off once isn't a problem.
even if you can PWM a multi tesla magnet, how would that help? each ball would move up with different time and inertia, so pulsing the main field in the presence of gravity does little.
Back to top
teravolt
Wed Nov 14 2012, 03:59AM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
If this ever happened the junk yard magnet would have to have be a AC magnetic field because there are no power sources in the balls. that old magnet would never have a mgnetic field powerfull enough to lift anything ten feet in the air. fake!
Back to top
Josh Campbell
Wed Nov 14 2012, 04:37AM
Josh Campbell Registered Member #5258 Joined: Sun Jun 10 2012, 10:15PM
Location: Missouri - USA
Posts: 119
Talking purely on a what if basis. I would say that the stationary magnet would have a constant Tesla. Each floating device would have to be individually addressable (nothing difficult there) and able to adjust it's reactance to the constant field (difficult).

Possible ideas to actually do something like this (just brain storming):
-A small, single electromagnet like what they showed in the video (small screw with wire around it on that board). Full on and it would shoot away or toward the large field. PWM the power level to maybe control the attraction, but the orientation is still not controllable.

-Multiple electromagnets say at minimum 3, one on each axis forming the shape of a "jacks". Throw in a 3-axis accelerometer and PWM control of each magnet and you now have the ability to thrust in any direction and measure that movement. Maybe add in a hall effect sensor at some distance from the "thruster" magnets to measure the field strength and orientation of the large field to give the craft spacial awareness.

-The above navigation controls but rather than traditional electromagnets use an aluminum ball with small coils placed on the axes inside the ball generating eddy currents in the walls of the aluminum ball and thus opposing magnetic fields.


Of course a big problem would be powering the ball while not weighing it down. Options there could be a form of wireless power, perhaps rather than a stationary magnetic field use an alternating magnetic field. A coil in the ball converts the field alternations into power. And the hall effect switch ensure that propulsion is reversed each time the field reverses.

I still think that the strength at which the large field would need to operate would make the device to dangerous and or not reasonably feasible. Maybe if the field could be concentrated in a smaller controllable area. Some type of halbach array. Maybe in the gap of a large U ferrite... I'm probably going to end up dreaming about some magnetic flying machine tonight, thanks again interwebz.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Nov 14 2012, 05:11AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
yeah even moderately powerful magnetic fields can accelerate objects at lethal speeds/force. To 2byte's point.
Back to top
macona
Wed Nov 14 2012, 12:55PM
macona Registered Member #3272 Joined: Mon Oct 04 2010, 11:40PM
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 101
Fake:

Link2
Back to top
Tetris
Wed Nov 14 2012, 08:18PM
Tetris Registered Member #4016 Joined: Thu Jul 21 2011, 01:52AM
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 660
Fake or not, it still looks really cool. All I could think about is... you can buy almost anything that's known to humankind on e-bay.
Back to top
BigBad
Wed Nov 14 2012, 08:29PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Patrick wrote ...

even if you can PWM a multi tesla magnet, how would that help? each ball would move up with different time and inertia, so pulsing the main field in the presence of gravity does little.
If you put iron core into the balls, then they will tend to stick together and form one lump, and you might be able to control that lump, at least to some degree; but it will be fairly unstable.
Back to top
Conundrum
Fri Nov 16 2012, 06:41PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
About the only way this might work is to put a small fan inside each ball to provide a counter force.
This would keep the stack stable, and with the addition of induction power and LEDs would make a 3-D display feasible.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Fri Nov 16 2012, 06:56PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
What about putting a coil around a ferromagnetic core and dynamically connecting it to a tank capacitor? Wouldn't that oppose the magnetic field?
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.