Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 72
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

house clocks and back up generators

Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Sun Nov 04 2012, 04:18AM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
When I lost power due to Sandy my backup generator turned on. I noticed that my digital bedroom clock (it's from 1980) and microwave clock all ran fast. By the end of the day they were ahead about an hour. I measured my voltage and it was 125vac and about 63hz.

I would think that the clocks rectify the voltage and use a voltage regulator, but this does not seem so. Is it the higher voltage that is causing the circuits to run faster? Could it be noise spikes from the generator?

I'm running the generator right in the range specified in the manual (62-63hz, 123-126vac).
Back to top
Mattski
Sun Nov 04 2012, 04:35AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Some clocks derive their time from the power line frequency, 60 cycles per second. The frequency from the utility company is regulated so that even if the clock runs slightly fast they make sure to slow it down so that on average a clock that runs off of this should be quite accurate.

If your generator is putting out 63 Hz then it will cause your clocks to run 5% faster than usual (if they do use the line frequency), which works out to about an hour per day.
Back to top
klugesmith
Sun Nov 04 2012, 04:37PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
For long term cumulative accuracy,
counting power line cycles beats any inexpensive crystal oscillator reference.
In fact it is as good as an "atomic clock" that receives time signals from a government broadcasting station. And even for short periods, the tolerable frequency deviaton is less than 0.1% IIRC (easy to look up on internet).

The above is not necessarily true in developing countries.
Back to top
genious 7
Sun Nov 04 2012, 07:49PM
genious 7 Registered Member #2887 Joined: Sat May 29 2010, 11:10PM
Location: Panama City, Panama
Posts: 107
Yep, its the line freq, not the line voltage. Many clocks use the line freq instead of a quartz crystal as it is more dependable; the power company regulates it so that on average, it is exactly 60hz.
Back to top
BigBad
Sun Nov 04 2012, 10:59PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
It's certainly not as good as an atomic clock due to power failures, and the fact that the short-term frequency isn't constant either.
Back to top
Electra
Mon Nov 05 2012, 06:13PM
Electra Registered Member #816 Joined: Sun Jun 03 2007, 07:29PM
Location:
Posts: 156
Possibly the manual says to run at a slightly higher frequency, to allow for the Rpm to drop a bit under load.

What about a phase lock loop circuit to keep the genny locked to an Xtal reference, assuming there was some form of electronic actuator of the throttle position. Would that work or not? How do the power company’s archive such accurate frequency control, unlikely it’s still done by manually watching the freq.
Back to top
lightlinked
Mon Nov 05 2012, 07:23PM
lightlinked Registered Member #2087 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 08:32AM
Location:
Posts: 115
last time I lost power it was fun to see how much the freq fluctuates using a kill-a-watt. $20 well spent for any geek
there are now small gens that use inverters. which of course would bring up the criticisms of cheap inverters. We're glad you are still alive and have electricity.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.