Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 86
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

More wire improves efficiency of a coil?

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Yanom
Sun Oct 14 2012, 11:01PM Print
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
The magnetic power of a coil is determined by amp-turns - how many amps flow through it times how many turns of wire it has (more or less).
Subjecting the following coils to a 1v power supply, and assuming that 1 turn of wire adds 1 ohm of resistance:

1 turn coil has 1 ohm - 1 amp - 1 amp-turns
2 turn coil has 2 ohm - 0.5 amp - 1 amp-turns
4 turn coil has 4 ohm - .25 amp - 1 amp-turns
8 turn coil has 8 ohm - .125 amp - 1 amp-turns

and so on. However, coils with more turns are more efficient because they get the same amp-turns for less power draw

right?
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Sun Oct 14 2012, 11:14PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Well sure, but you use 8 times as much copper on the 8 turns one ... with the same amount of copper you could have 1 turn (or 8 parallel turns) with 1/8 ohm at 1 amp OR 8 turns with 8 ohm at 0.125 amp. So I2R = 1/8 Watts for both of them.

TANSTAAFL.

PS. that said, you'll generally have fewer losses in the driver with lower currents.
Back to top
radiotech
Sun Oct 14 2012, 11:35PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Ampere-turns determines the magnetic flux in a core of a given area. The coil is
sized to produce the flux desired. The thickness/resistance of the wire permits
various voltages to produce flux.
Back to top
Yanom
Mon Oct 15 2012, 03:36AM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
Pinky's Brain wrote ...

Well sure, but you use 8 times as much copper on the 8 turns one ... with the same amount of copper you could have 1 turn (or 8 parallel turns) with 1/8 ohm at 1 amp OR 8 turns with 8 ohm at 0.125 amp. So I2R = 1/8 Watts for both

oh. but assuming they're both equal magnetic performance , and I run both coils off a 9v battery, wont the 0.125amp one drain the battery slower because its lower current?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Oct 15 2012, 07:22AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
As Pinky's Brain points out, the number of turns washes out. If you are designing an electromagnet of a given size and shape, then if you want to increase the number of turns, you have to use thinner wire, or it won't fit. The required input voltage goes up and the current goes down, but the current density stays the same, hence so does the input power for a given MMF.

If you allow the magnet to get bigger as you add more wire, this doesn't hold. But you'll find that the larger coil doesn't generate as many amp-turns as you'd think. MMF is actually measured in amp-turns per meter, and the bigger coil simply spreads the flux over a wider area rather than increasing it at the measuring point.

It follows that the "efficiency" of a magnet (amp-turns of MMF per watt of input power) is mainly determined by the conductivity of the magnet wire. Superconducting magnets need no input power at all once charged.
Back to top
Yanom
Mon Oct 15 2012, 12:09PM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
Steve Conner wrote ...

As Pinky's Brain points out, the number of turns washes out. If you are designing an electromagnet of a given size and shape, then if you want to increase the number of turns, you have to use thinner wire, or it won't fit. The required input voltage goes up and the current goes down, but the current density stays the same, hence so does the input power for a given MMF.

If you allow the magnet to get bigger as you add more wire, this doesn't hold. But you'll find that the larger coil doesn't generate as many amp-turns as you'd think. MMF is actually measured in amp-turns per meter, and the bigger coil simply spreads the flux over a wider area rather than increasing it at the measuring point.

It follows that the "efficiency" of a magnet (amp-turns of MMF per watt of input power) is mainly determined by the conductivity of the magnet wire. Superconducting magnets need no input power at all once charged.

so adding more wire helps up to the point that the coil gets too big?

and the 8ohm 0.125 amp coil would drain the battery slower, wouldn't it? battery capacity is measured in amp-hours.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Oct 15 2012, 12:20PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
You need to define "helps" more clearly.

Yes, the 8 ohm coil would drain the battery slower. However, the lower resistance coils would produce the same MMF with a lower battery voltage.

A 9V battery is 6 1.5V cells in series inside. If you used a coil with one-sixth the turns, of wire 6x thicker in cross-sectional area, you could drive it using the same 6 cells in parallel. The resulting coil dimensions, amp-turns and battery life would be identical.

Moral of the story: there is no optimum number of turns for an electromagnet. You choose the number of turns and wire gauge to suit whatever power supply you want to use, and whatever current density your cooling system can handle with a safe temperature rise.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Mon Oct 15 2012, 01:18PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Yanom wrote ...

oh. but assuming they're both equal magnetic performance , and I run both coils off a 9v battery, wont the 0.125amp one drain the battery slower because its lower current?
My point was that they are at equal magnetic performance at equal power consumption for the same amount of copper ... they are however not at equal power consumption at the same voltage and thus not at equal magnetic performance either.

If you just want to make a solenoid to be powered from a 9V battery I would follow the following steps:

- Determine how much current you want to pull and calculate the resistance necessary for that
- Determine how much money you want to spend on wire
- Find the thickest gauge wire from which you can wind enough turns within your budget to get to the resistance needed

This is assuming thicker gauge will be cheaper per weight of copper, which won't always be true ... so keep that in mind if you end up looking at exotic gauges. Also assuming that since it's a 9V battery you probably won't use enough power to burn up the wire.
Back to top
Yanom
Mon Oct 15 2012, 02:45PM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
ok. I think I sort of get it....

Let's take an equal amount of copper and make 2 coils:

#1: 1 turn, (1/8) ohm
and
#2: 8 turn, 8 ohm
and apply both coils to a 1v power source

so for coil #1:
8 amps * 1 turn = 8 amp turns
8 amps * 1v = 8 watts
1 Aturn / watt

so for coil #2:
(1/8) amps * 8 turn = 1 amp turns
(1/8) amps * 1v = (1/8) watts
8 Aturn / watt


so the coils aren't equal magnetically. but i still don't quite understand - isn't coil #2 more efficient, with 8 amp turns per watt?

thanks for the help.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Mon Oct 15 2012, 03:20PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Magnetic potential does not have a linear relation with electrical power ... so Aturn/Watt is not a useful metric (try swapping the currents for both). At the same electrical power they have the same magnetic potential.

The force a solenoid exerts on another magnet or ferromagnetic object Force does have linear relation with electrical power though ... and a quadratic relation with magnetic potential.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.