Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 113
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Secondary MMC - thinkable for normal mid-sized DRSSTCs?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
axelro
Thu Aug 16 2012, 08:20PM Print
axelro Registered Member #3640 Joined: Sat Jan 22 2011, 12:16PM
Location: Germany close to Heidelberg
Posts: 39
Hi together,
I have lately been reading about secondary MMC's here, one case for a small DRSSTC and one for a QCW type coil.

Is this concept thinkable for normal mid sized DRSSTCs? It would probably be possible to cover a voltage of approx 80-100kV. No clue what voltage a normal mid size (60cm) DRSSTC typically reaches. My coil has about 200kHz resonance - with some internal MMC I could get this down for the real big brick IGBTs.

Possible or fail?

Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Aug 16 2012, 08:28PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
My main concern with the secondary MMC is that if the topload arcs heavily to ground, the capacitor bank will transmit a big pulse straight to the bottom of the secondary. I think with big high-powered coils this could lead to horrific flashovers between the secondary base and anything else nearby.

A mid-size DRSSTC will have an output voltage somewhere between 250 and 500kV.
Back to top
axelro
Thu Aug 16 2012, 09:01PM
axelro Registered Member #3640 Joined: Sat Jan 22 2011, 12:16PM
Location: Germany close to Heidelberg
Posts: 39
Thank you, Steve.

Pity, think this will be difficult to achieve then. Seemed so intriguing to lower fres through such a concept.
Back to top
Dr. ISOTOP
Thu Aug 16 2012, 10:19PM
Dr. ISOTOP Registered Member #2919 Joined: Fri Jun 11 2010, 06:30PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 652
Without accurate knowledge of just how high the topload voltage is, its pretty hard to make a secondary MMC that operates reliably.
Back to top
plazmatron
Thu Aug 16 2012, 10:35PM
plazmatron Registered Member #1134 Joined: Tue Nov 20 2007, 04:39PM
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 351
Indeed.
For small coils, this seems to be just the ticket. Steve Ward's coil runs at about 50kV, and mine certainly doesn't run much higher.

For regular DRSSTC use this is mostly an untested method of lowering fres. I have no idea how long the caps will last in such a setup (especially cheap disc ceramics).
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Thu Aug 16 2012, 10:52PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Also the sparks would lose current and brightness because of the lower frequency.
Back to top
Uspring
Fri Aug 17 2012, 11:42AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
axelro wrote:

Is this concept thinkable for normal mid sized DRSSTCs? It would probably be possible to cover a voltage of approx 80-100kV. No clue what voltage a normal mid size (60cm) DRSSTC typically reaches. My coil has about 200kHz resonance - with some internal MMC I could get this down for the real big brick IGBTs.
If you want to reduce frequency I'd go for more secondary inductance. That will also reduce secondary Q, easying tuning.

Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Sat Aug 18 2012, 06:05AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
plazmatron wrote ...

For regular DRSSTC use this is mostly an untested method of lowering fres. I have no idea how long the caps will last in such a setup (especially cheap disc ceramics).

Lets remember that Steve Wards 3 main reasons for adding the secondary MMC had nothing to do with lowering the resonant frequency, but mostly preventing streamers from loading the secondary out of tune.

Steve Ward wrote ...
Another interesting feature of this system is a secondary MMC. That is, there is a string of 72 x 1.2nF 700VAC capacitors INSIDE of the secondary coil. This capacitor adds about 17pF to the coil. There are a few reasons for this. 1) due to the gigantic streamers this thing produces, detuning is a serious issue, so the coil needs to have a pretty decent amount of self capacitance. 2) more Csec drops the impedance of the coil, which seems to improve spark growth behavior. 3) adding more energy storage to the secondary coil means slightly less circulating current in the primary. The way i think of it is that the system Q probably stays about the same, but since there is more energy in the secondary, there is less stored in the primary. This capacitor also provides convenient measurement of the toroid voltage by measuring the current through this capacitor only. This is where i obtained the 55kV number, which is in good agreement with previous direct HV measurement of my last QCW system using a Jennings HV vacuum cap divider. So indeed, the voltage is low.
Back to top
Goodchild
Sun Aug 19 2012, 04:50AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Simulations I have done with my large sized DRSSTC (7 feet tall) at 10 feet of arc I except around 450Kv note that the voltage changes drastically with frequency and secondary specs. The best way i think to figure out the voltage would be to simulate then try it in real life and see if your cap blows up. Other than massively expensive supper awesome volt divider + scope. (kidding) wink

My thoughts on a secondary cap for a mid to big DRSSTC would be kinda pointless in my mind. The way i see it the main reasons to add a secondary cap are to lower the secondary resonant fres or to compensate for capacitive spark loading or both....

Capacitive spark loading really only becomes a problem when you are trying to push a massive amount of spark out of a very tiny secondary like a QCW as the spark capacitance overwhelms the secondary self capacitance.

Lowering the secondary capacitance is usefully for like what plazmatron did when winding a small secondary and not wanting to use a bunch of tinny wire.

Other than these two reasons I don't see any reason to add capacitance to the secondary circuit. A mid sized or large sized DR doesn't have ether of these problems and on top of this I agree with Steve in that it would add a massive amount of energy that could be very bad when it has a heavy ground arc. (I already flinch when I get big ground arcs, I would probably be missing chunks of strike rail if I added a secondary cap hehe)
Back to top
PhilGood
Sun Aug 19 2012, 11:55AM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
Goodchild wrote ...

...The best way i think to figure out the voltage would be to simulate then try it in real life and see if your cap blows up. Other than massively expensive supper awesome volt divider + scope. (kidding) wink...
Terry Fritz built an interesting probe that is able to rather accurately mesure TC's output Voltage and Current. Click on pic for his project page:

Image110
But I noticed something wrong in Terry's calculations : he used "pi R^2" to calculate the surface area of a sphere, when it is "4pi R^2". We have to take this into account when calculating the probe to coil distance that gives accurate current measurements.

I haven't built it yet but I made a quick test that sounds promising


Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.