Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 40
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
01/31 Mathias (41)
01/31 slash128v6 (52)
02/01 Barry (70)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

A question on DRSSTC tank capacitor arrangements

Move Thread LAN_403
Blitz
Sat May 05 2012, 09:53PM Print
Blitz Registered Member #4532 Joined: Sun Apr 22 2012, 03:16AM
Location:
Posts: 3
I am building a smaller sized DRSSTC based upon Steve Ward's DRSSTC-3, and I currently have 4x CDE 942C20P15K capacitors. I was wondering if an arrangement of (1) 2 strings of 2 of caps in series yielding 4kv at 150 nF or (2) 1 string of 4 caps in series yielding 8kv at 37.5nF would give better results for my tank capacitor?

Specifications of my coil just in case they help to answer my question:
4.5x11" secondary with 1100 turns of 30 AWG wire
8" diameter primary with 5 turns of 1/4" copper tubing
3x10.5" toroid made from aluminum dryer ducting
4x CDE 942C20P15K tank capactior
4x IRG4PC50UD IGBT's in a H-Bridge
Steve Ward's Universal DRSSTC Driver and interrupter
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Mon May 07 2012, 06:58AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
A quick plot of your coil data into JAVATC shows that you need to tap your primary coil at 2.2 turns with a 150nF MMC and at 4.6 turns with 37.5nF.

As you are using TO-247 package IGBTs, I would suggest going for highest possible impedance, 37.5nF MCC with about 5 turns on the primary would spare the IGBTs from a much higher peak current that they would see with the larger MMC.

Run longer on-times to get a decent spark output, this is the safest way to go if this is your first DRSSTC, you can make a low impedance, super high peak current coil with a MMC blasting many joules per bang when you have more experience and a lot of money :)
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon May 07 2012, 07:15AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
If you want to spare your devices from high peak current, use a current limiter. Steve Ward and others call it OCD but I prefer to leave that for obsessive-compulsive disorder. smile

Then if your coil is set up wrongly, it'll just make undersized sparks instead of exploding, and you can tinker with the setup all you like.

For what it's worth, I found that my coil performed much the same with tank capacitors of 50 and 100nf. The variable that made the greatest difference to performance was coupling. The tighter the coupling, the more sparks I got per amp of primary current.
Back to top
Graham Armitage
Fri May 09 2014, 08:12PM
Graham Armitage Registered Member #6038 Joined: Mon Aug 06 2012, 11:31AM
Location: Salado, TX
Posts: 248
Steve Conner wrote ...

For what it's worth, I found that my coil performed much the same with tank capacitors of 50 and 100nf. The variable that made the greatest difference to performance was coupling. The tighter the coupling, the more sparks I got per amp of primary current.

This is really interesting - so if you were to design a new coil, what would your MMC config design focus on as a primary requirement? Max Voltage, Max Current, operational reliability, heating ?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri May 09 2014, 08:46PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The main design parameter I use nowadays is size of each individual capacitor compared to a can of beans. smile This is the last MMC I built using 1 string of 8 industrial GTO snubber caps. Each unit is rated at 6uF, 2500V DC, 4000V peak. I forgot what the peak current rating is, but it is well into the thousands of amps.
1395511425 30 FT4896 1393820 10151999009056584 773641908 N
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Sat May 10 2014, 06:40AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
Steve Conner wrote ...

The main design parameter I use nowadays is size of each individual capacitor compared to a can of beans. smile This is the last MMC I built using 1 string of 8 industrial GTO snubber caps. Each unit is rated at 6uF, 2500V DC, 4000V peak. I forgot what the peak current rating is, but it is well into the thousands of amps.

It has a 5000Apeak rating, same as my same type capacitors at 4uF 3kVDC, 4KVDCpeak. I use 5 of them in a string for 0.8uF at 15-20kVDC rating.

To help myself and other do quick surveys and design of the MMC I made a calculator, I fulfill all the parameters in red text under advanced results: Link2

I design for reliability since, when building a large DRSSTC, everything cost a great deal of money, so no need to blow it all up because you want to save money on the MMC, I just faced the fact that if something is worth doing, it is worth doing right.

So keep an eye out for the temperature rise of the MMC capacitors :)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.