Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 97
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

help with my gdt waves

Move Thread LAN_403
Ben Solon
Fri Mar 02 2012, 09:50PM Print
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
hey again.
today i just put together a crude gate drive section on my breadboard. it runs off of 5v from an arduino, and is controlled by the arduino as well. my gdt calculations worked out well: 202khz gives a cycle time of 5uS(so on time is 2.5uS). the arduino is incapable of being accurate a these speeds though... it still works with my gdt(no saturation) with an on time of ~10uS.

for those who want to know, it is 9 turns around a 105mm^2 core of epcos n30 material with an al of 4620. time is 10uS as stated.

my problem is with the waveform. it will work, it doesn't ring, or overshoot excessively, nor is it over or under dampened. it looks like it *may* have too low inductance. but its strange.

here are the waveforms:
first unloaded secondary
then loaded with igbts(no resistor)


1330724948 3900 FT0 Gdt Secondary Unloaded 2 Jpeg

1330724948 3900 FT0 Gdt Secondary Loaded With Igbts 2 Jpeg
Back to top
dude_500
Sun Mar 04 2012, 03:31AM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
I'm guessing it's not saturating, at 9 turns that would only be 0.2A magnetization current at 200khz. A core with 1cm^2 cross section should easily handle that on 9 turns. You can confirm for sure if you know the saturation flux of the core. Do you have plenty of buscap on the gate driver output?

Also I assume you're testing at 200khz? It's hard to tell from your description. If you're accidentally testing it at some low frequency then saturation would be expected
Back to top
Ben Solon
Sun Mar 04 2012, 04:53AM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
Link2

Sorry for the lack of clarity. Above are some tests i ran. The number in the top left is the number of turns on my core. Using the N V T B Ae formula I get a minimum turns of 1.58. This matches well with the above data correct? As for the circuit, it is USB powered, with a 10uF ceramic cap on each ucc. If you want to re calculate it, the time is ~10uS, voltage is 5v, Ae is 105mm^2, and I think n30 material has peak flux density of .4, but use .3 to be safe. And for good measure, the al is 4620nH/t^2.

Edit: the gdt in the above test is not the same one with problems. It is 1:1 with 1 primary and 1 secondary. It uses thicker wire, and it's loaded with 1 igbt. Why it looks the same loaded as the first one does unloaded? I don't know. It may be that cat5 has too thin wire and is causing resistance. As it stands, the data from that one holds no value and was just to test the effects of the number of windings.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Mar 04 2012, 07:50AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Looks fine. The funny appearance of the peaks is probably because you're running the UCCs off 5V. The peaks probably always look like that, but most people use 12 or 15V so the funkiness is relatively 3 times smaller.

It's caused by the GDT's magnetising current. During the first half of the peak, it's returning to the supply through the UCC's on-chip diodes, pushing the output 0.7v outside the rail. During the second half, it flows in the forward direction and the voltage drop changes sign. This can be seen very clearly in the scope shots with few turns.
Back to top
Ben Solon
Sun Mar 04 2012, 07:21PM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
ok, thanks steve, i was starting to worry. i don't want the igbt's fall back into saturation when i start pushing the current through them.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.