If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1525
Joined: Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:16AM
Location: America
Posts: 294
The cylindrical projectile would probably have slightly better magnetic coupeling with the coil, but I think the losses that come with sharpening the last few centimeters are going to be miniscule. The sharpened tip gives you greater advantages, such as less drag and more importantly, more penetrating power. I like to build my coilguns to do as much damage as possible, and the sharp tip is necessary to get the killing power.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Here are three other ideas for making laminated projectiles to reduce eddy currents.
1. Glue together a stack of "I" laminations from a transformer core, to make bar with a square cross section. Could wrap with fiberglass for more strength.
2. If you can get a sufficiently thin sheet of steel, roll it into a very thick-walled tube. OK to leave a steel mandrel in the center (like a sardine-can key?) The spiral cross-section can't conduct circumferential eddy current, if the turns are insulated from each other. For example, use painted metal from a "tin" cookie container.
3. Use a dense bundle of straight steel wires, bonded with epoxy. Could use glass tubing or a test-tube as sacrificial mold -- make barrel to fit projectile, instead of the other way around. Vacuum methods might help to get good resin penetration.
Have you got your hands dirty yet? How about making and characterizing a coilgun with traditional solid-steel projectiles? Then you would have a reference system, against which to compare the alleged benefits of eddy-current suppression or "external iron".
Registered Member #1451
Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
Yeah I may vote for a no sharpened tip projectile, but all of mine are sharpened! Have you thought of using JB weld? As far as I know it's not conductive but is impregnated with steel filings so you would already be part of the way there. Plus, JB weld is some of the strongest epoxy I know of. It is actually used to fix cracks in the pistons in engines where my step dad works. You might not have a problem with chipping.
Registered Member #3888
Joined: Sun May 15 2011, 09:50PM
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 649
I already suggested J-B weld :P Their website said it was insulating, so that's good. I'll try it out myself sometime soon. I've tried the I laminations before. If you use pieces from several transformer sizes then you can form more of a rounded shape by putting the widest sections in the middle and decreasing the width as you stack them up (might provide slightly better fill factor that way if you choose to surround the laminations with epoxy to make it round.) You could also just leave it as a square and use square holed transformer bobbin to make your coil on. A square barrel could be tricky though... I've considered the wire segment idea before because i saw the same sort of core used in a classroom demo device. Can't think of a source material to use though. the sheet metal spiral is a new one. I wonder if that ultraperm shielding they're always trying to sell on goldmine would work well. Just a thought. Would those super permeability materials even be good to use? Oh and directly comparing two different projectiles using the same coil setup wouldn't be the best comparison unless you could somehow get their size and mass to be equal. I think what you'd have to do is find the optimum coil/initial position for each projectile and then compare the efficiency (using the same bank and switching.) There's gotta be a better way than that to compare the materials though. Something with a permanent magnet maybe? or use it in the core of an electromagnet and do something with it? any ideas?
I agree that the projectile should be pointed if you intend to shoot it at anything hard. If the front is flat, then a ding or hard impact could misshape the edge and cause it to catch on the inside of the barrel.
Anyways, Pink have you tried anything yet or are you still just theorizing?
Did anyone thought about or tried to make a projectile from a piece of thick-wall iron pipe, length-cutted? Something like 10mm in outer diameter, 6mm inner, 15mm in length. Just another theoretical idea, but IMHO such projectile may be accelerated with higher efficiency, have lower eddy loses and be more stabile in air. If velocity is high, screw-thread on the inner part may give it some spinning also due to the compressed air going through it. Sure, making such projectile require special equipment, but maybe anyone have it? =>
Registered Member #4659
Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
Yandersen wrote ...
Did anyone thought about or tried to make a projectile from a piece of thick-wall iron pipe, length-cutted? Something like 10mm in outer diameter, 6mm inner, 15mm in length. Just another theoretical idea, but IMHO such projectile may be accelerated with higher efficiency, have lower eddy loses and be more stabile in air. If velocity is high, screw-thread on the inner part may give it some spinning also due to the compressed air going through it. Sure, making such projectile require special equipment, but maybe anyone have it? =>
Thought about this. It seems that you'd want your projectile mass closer to the wall of the coil, so it could be hollow.... and shorter projectiles are better right? Is that true up to a point or would it be good to have a coin-shaped projectile shorter than it is wide?
The hole through projectile will increase efficiency only for coils with few layers of wire. For most efficient shape (3x outer to inner diameter) it will not add any significant benefit as field inside such coils is almost constant all over the hole. I am not completely sure about overshortening the projectile. The shorter the coil the better, yes, but overshortening projectile by making it's length close to diameter or even shorter may be not efficient even for such short coils. And the shorter the projectile the less stable it in the air.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.