Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 13
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

PNP (or P-FET) better for coil driver?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Fulmen
Mon Dec 19 2011, 11:41AM Print
Fulmen Registered Member #3883 Joined: Fri May 13 2011, 06:30PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
I've noticed that all coil driver designs out there are based on NPN transistors, leaving the coil "hanging" on the positive. Wouldn't it be better to use a PNP so that the coil gets clamped to ground?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 11:42AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
For semiconductor physics reasons, NPN transistors and N-channel MOSFETs perform better than their complements. (Electrons have a higher mobility than holes.)

Nowadays you can buy P-channel devices that are supposedly exact complements (like the IRFP9240 vs. the IRFP240) but the performance difference just appears in another way: the P-type ones need a bigger silicon die, so they are more expensive and slower.

Back in the old days, only PNP transistors were available, so the circuits were all built "upside down".
Back to top
Fulmen
Mon Dec 19 2011, 11:53AM
Fulmen Registered Member #3883 Joined: Fri May 13 2011, 06:30PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
I've noticed that PNPs and PFETs of the same rating are more expensive, so that might be part of the reason. This might also make everybody think NPN from the start rather than think of what they should do and choose components based on that.

But from a strictly theoretical point, am I right? Wouldn't it be better and safer to keep the coil clamped to ground?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:07PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
No. If your positive supply rail is properly bypassed, then it's the same as ground from the perspective of AC current and transients.

If it's not properly bypassed, then it should be.
Back to top
Fulmen
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:19PM
Fulmen Registered Member #3883 Joined: Fri May 13 2011, 06:30PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
I'm not sure what you mean by bypassed here.
My concern was the lack of common ground when hooking this up to further circuitry (like a Tesla), you're saying one could use a common positive with the same result?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:22PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I'm saying that if the power supply is properly bypassed (google it Link2

then positive is the same as ground, only 12V further up, or 24 or 48 or whatever. Any nasty RF that gets dumped into the positive will flow harmlessly to ground through the bypass capacitors.

Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean by "coil". Do you mean an ignition coil where the high voltage secondary has one end connected to the positive end of the primary? Not even all ignition coils are like that, some have a separate ground terminal for the HV winding.
Back to top
Fulmen
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:32PM
Fulmen Registered Member #3883 Joined: Fri May 13 2011, 06:30PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
Aaaah, now I'm with you (I get most of the principles but doesn't always know the lingo). A bypass capacitor would take care of that.

The ignition coil I'm using has a common ground for both windings, and I just didn't like the way it was "hanging" freely in the circuit.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:42PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well then, connect that common ground to the positive supply rail and drive the other end of the primary.
Back to top
Fulmen
Mon Dec 19 2011, 12:55PM
Fulmen Registered Member #3883 Joined: Fri May 13 2011, 06:30PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
Yeah, I see what you're getting at. Plus and ground are not absolutes so a circuit can be built "upside down" without any ill effects. Clever.
It's easy to get stuck in a mindset, I was thinking of ground as an absolute. And since I am powering a tesla coil I wanted both connected to the same ground. But the tesla doesn't need to be grounded, and probably shouldn't either, right? You just need a ground plane for the top load to create the proper capacitance.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 19 2011, 01:01PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
You'll need two wires connecting the HV power supply to the Tesla coil tank circuit. One of them obviously comes from the ignition coil's high voltage terminal. The other one can come from either the positive supply or the ground rail of your circuit. It should make no difference which.

The bottom of the Tesla coil secondary will need to be connected to a good RF ground.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.