Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 103
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

What to do with a Boostcap?

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
klugesmith
Mon Dec 12 2011, 11:04PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
The cap can definitely source more current then a mot.

What's the basis of that statement?
Imagine a nice big MOT after removing the HV secondary and the core shunts.
I bet we can run it a bit over 1 volt per turn.

Now give it a 1-turn secondary made of rectangular copper bar,
say 1x4 cm in cross section and 20 cm effective length.
With rho_Cu of 1.7e-6 ohm-cm, the new secondary would have a resistance of about 8.5 microohms (vs. 700 microohms for the boostcap under discussion).
You want to match voltages, make it 2 turns (34 uO) or 3 turns (77 uO).

For each turns count, let's triple the effective resistance to account for the primary winding resistance reflected to the secondary. (the copper-filling factor of mains voltage primary is not as good as the solid copper we're figuring for the secondary).
They will all still be much less than the rated ESR of the boostcap,
so short circuit current will be higher.
And the MOT windings won't get appreciably hot in the time it would take the boostcap to be discharged.



Back to top
Patrick
Mon Dec 12 2011, 11:38PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
klugesmith wrote ...

And the MOT windings won't get appreciably hot in the time it would take the boostcap to be discharged.

Im certain the secondary and core would not get warm or hot in this short time, but what about the primary? The primary will see alot of current through its gaggle of turns. Surely that would cause some temp rise?

or do others say different?
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue Dec 13 2011, 03:24AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Patrick wrote ...

Im certain the secondary and core would not get warm or hot in this short time, but what about the primary? The primary will see alot of current through its gaggle of turns. Surely that would cause some temp rise? or do others say different?
Excellent question.
Not counting the magnetizing current, the primary and secondary will have about the same number of ampere-turns. Their relative current densities will be inversely proportional to the total cross-sectional area of copper in all the turns.
My previous resistance estimate implied that the primary has half as much total copper area as the secondary (2 cm^2 vs 4 cm^2). So [edit] twice the current density in amps/cm^2. Within the "inertial cooling" time frame, which is measured in minutes for things as massive as MOTs, it will have four times as much temperature rise.
Back to top
Patrick
Tue Dec 13 2011, 04:00AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
klugesmith wrote ...

Patrick wrote ...

Im certain the secondary and core would not get warm or hot in this short time, but what about the primary? The primary will see alot of current through its gaggle of turns. Surely that would cause some temp rise? or do others say different?
Excellent question.
When heavily loaded, the primary and secondary have practically the same number of ampere-turns. Relative current densities are inversely proportional to the total cross-sectional area of copper in all the turns.
My previous resistance estimate implied that the primary has half as much total copper area as the secondary (2 cm^2 vs 4 cm^2). So four times the current density in amps/cm^2. Within the "inertial cooling" time frame, which is measured in minutes for things as massive as MOTs, it will have four times as much temperature rise.


I see...let me ponder that which you have said for someminutes.
Back to top
dude_500
Tue Dec 13 2011, 04:10PM
dude_500 Registered Member #2288 Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
You could do this. I was bored last night and had a few boxes on the shelf. 130kJ is really fun, even at low voltage.
1323792628 2288 FT130003 Boosts
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.