Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 74
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Volts per turn question.

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Daedronus
Mon Dec 05 2011, 04:24PM
Daedronus Registered Member #2329 Joined: Tue Sept 01 2009, 08:25AM
Location:
Posts: 370
What about this ?
Link2

If I'm not mistaken the main goal with transformers is to keep the flux below the saturation flux.
I think 2000 gauss is a good value for ferrite cores.
Back to top
Marko
Mon Dec 05 2011, 04:56PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Daedronus wrote ...

What about this ?
Link2

If I'm not mistaken the main goal with transformers is to keep the flux below the saturation flux.
I think 2000 gauss is a good value for ferrite cores.

Yes, but that is not the ultimate limiting factor in V/turn since you can keep the peak flux density the same as long as the frequency is increased proportionally to increase in V/turn.

The true limit is imposed by losses, especially eddy current losses which are proportional to square of V/turn (and to less extent hysteresis losses, which are proportional to frequency).

Marko
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 05 2011, 05:10PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes. The N27 datasheet linked above gives the following core loss figures:

25kHz, 200mT: 155kW per cubic metre
100kHz, 200mT: 920kW per cubic metre

which is 0.155 and 0.92W per cubic centimetre. The core set has a volume of 518cc, so that adds up to quite a lot of core loss!
Back to top
jpsmith123
Mon Dec 05 2011, 05:39PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
When I look at the (simulated) current in a voltage multiplier circuit, I see that it's pulses. For a given load on the multiplier, as I decrease the duty cycle of the square wave drive - significantly - there's hardly any change in the output voltage across the load, accordingly.

This suggests to me that if you're going to drive a voltage multiplier with a HFHV ferrite transformer, it's probably better to drive the primary with a waveform having a crest factor higher than 1; IOW something other than a straight (approx. 50% dc) squarewave from a hard-switched bridge. (Will this be running open loop?) Doing this should allow you to use fewer primary (and thus secondary) turns for the same final output voltage while keeping the peak flux in the core under control because of the smaller volts-seconds.
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Dec 05 2011, 05:45PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Dr. Quark wrote ...

Yes. The N27 datasheet linked above gives the following core loss figures:

25kHz, 200mT: 155kW per cubic metre
100kHz, 200mT: 920kW per cubic metre

which is 0.155 and 0.92W per cubic centimetre. The core set has a volume of 518cc, so that adds up to quite a lot of core loss!

The cores are good for 2.5kW, so 80W losses @ 25kHz is around 3%. These will be oil cooled.


jpsmith123 wrote ...

When I look at the (simulated) current in a voltage multiplier circuit, I see that it's pulses. For a given load on the multiplier, as I decrease the duty cycle of the square wave drive - significantly - there's hardly any change in the output voltage across the load, accordingly.

This suggests to me that if you're going to drive a voltage multiplier with a HFHV ferrite transformer, it's probably better to drive the primary with a waveform having a crest factor higher than 1; IOW something other than a straight (approx. 50% dc) squarewave from a hard-switched bridge. (Will this be running open loop?) Doing this should allow you to use fewer primary (and thus secondary) turns for the same final output voltage while keeping the peak flux in the core under control because of the smaller volts-seconds.

I'm planning on incorporating a capacitor in series with the primary. I believe this will 'shape' the pulse, to more of a sine wave than a square wave, but I'm not certain about this. Is this the kind of thing you had in mind?
Back to top
jpsmith123
Mon Dec 05 2011, 07:07PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
You could go with the so-called SLR topology, or maybe just back off the duty cycle on your SG3525 or TL494 or whatever you're using.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Dec 05 2011, 07:15PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, these voltage multiplier things run with discontinuous current. The "SLR"- series load resonant converter- is a good solution. It uses an inductor and capacitor in series with the transformer primary to tune the current pulses into half sinusoids of known frequency and well controlled amplitude. The usual way of driving it is with 50% duty cycle at half of this resonant frequency. This isn't maybe the most efficient way to drive it, but it's the easiest to control.

If you know what you are doing, the inductor can be built into the transformer's leakage inductance, but I've not seen any DIY builder pull this off yet.
Back to top
Daedronus
Mon Dec 05 2011, 09:39PM
Daedronus Registered Member #2329 Joined: Tue Sept 01 2009, 08:25AM
Location:
Posts: 370
Dr. Pork wrote ...

Daedronus wrote ...

What about this ?
Link2

If I'm not mistaken the main goal with transformers is to keep the flux below the saturation flux.
I think 2000 gauss is a good value for ferrite cores.

Yes, but that is not the ultimate limiting factor in V/turn since you can keep the peak flux density the same as long as the frequency is increased proportionally to increase in V/turn.

The true limit is imposed by losses, especially eddy current losses which are proportional to square of V/turn (and to less extent hysteresis losses, which are proportional to frequency).

Marko


As long as you use a reasonable frequency, like 30-60Khz heat should not be a problem.
Also, it should be easier to diagnose....if it gets hot you need a bigger core.
But if you saturate the core it's probably much worse, so I personally first pick a reasonable frequency, that see if I can wind enough turns so I'm far from saturation.


Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Dec 05 2011, 11:33PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Daedronus wrote ...

.
As long as you use a reasonable frequency, like 30-60Khz heat should not be a problem.
.



I can see that hysteresis losses will increase with frequency, and I can see that I can use smaller capacitances in the multiplier if the frequency is higher.

I'm aiming for 25kHz to start with, but will then see how far I can increase the frequency before it becomes inefficient.
Back to top
jpsmith123
Tue Dec 06 2011, 03:50PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Well I tried to simulate a SLR type half-bridge using "CircuitMaker 2000", and under certain conditions I seem to be getting waveforms similar to what I see other people getting, but it seems to be rather "touchy" and load dependent and the power throughput isn't very good.

I'm going to try it using pspice and see what happens, as I don't always trust circuitmaker.


Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.