Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 32
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
lokeycmos (43)


Next birthdays
05/24 Simon Barsinister (63)
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

DeSeversky Lifter, Made With Carbon Fiber.

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Wastrel
Wed Nov 09 2011, 06:39PM
Wastrel Registered Member #4095 Joined: Thu Sept 15 2011, 03:19PM
Location: England.
Posts: 122
A lifter has a sharp wire and a blunt one, the sharp one ionises the air, which is attracted to the blunt electrode. If it didn't neutralise there wouldn't be any thrust. I think maybe Scott is confusing this with ion propulsion.
Back to top
Scott Fusare
Wed Nov 09 2011, 06:53PM
Scott Fusare Registered Member #531 Joined: Sat Feb 17 2007, 10:51AM
Location: Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 125
Perhaps I am to an extent. I'll review and recant as needed.

EDIT:

And recant I shall. Sorry Patrick, I was not remembering the lifter correctly. Assuming all the ions are collected you are correct. The thin air / glow discharge problem will still be there though.

Alexander - It's unclear to me how neutralization is responsible for the thrust. The second electrode would seem to me to provide a preferred direction to the ion drift, yielding net thrust, and control the buildup of a deleterious space charge. Maybe I am still confused? (not an unusual occurrence)

Scott
Back to top
Wastrel
Wed Nov 09 2011, 09:32PM
Wastrel Registered Member #4095 Joined: Thu Sept 15 2011, 03:19PM
Location: England.
Posts: 122
It's my understanding that any charge that escapes the blunt electrode creates an equal and opposite impulse on it's journey away from the lifter.

I think you may also have a point about charge buildup on the craft, if this happens it will pull earthwards by electrostatics. Not sure of the magnetude of this effect. Additional lifter segments operating on reverse polarity may help.

This is such a cool project but the numbers I'm getting from web searches look horrendous, 90W lifts 2 ounces. Would it be cheating to make the craft neutrally buoyant first with a helium cell?
Back to top
Scott Fusare
Wed Nov 09 2011, 09:48PM
Scott Fusare Registered Member #531 Joined: Sat Feb 17 2007, 10:51AM
Location: Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 125
My understanding is that the thrust is due to ionized air molecules colliding with neutrals and imparting momentum to said neutrals as the ionized fellow drifts in the field toward the blunt electrode. The purpose of the blunt electrode appears to be field shaping for directing of the net drift. From a thrust generation standpoint I don't see that it makes any difference as to whether that ionized molecule is scavenged by the blunt electrode or if it continues off to infinity as far as the system is concerned.

Of course from the standpoint of Patrick's self contained system, the blunt electrode needs to collect the majority of the carriers else things will eventually stop working.

You are right about the efficiencies, absolutely abysmal. I would say Patrick has his work cut out for him.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Nov 09 2011, 10:42PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
scott fusare wrote ...

My understanding is that the thrust is due to ionized air molecules colliding with neutrals and imparting momentum to said neutrals as the ionized fellow drifts in the field toward the blunt electrode. The purpose of the blunt electrode appears to be field shaping for directing of the net drift. From a thrust generation standpoint I don't see that it makes any difference as to whether that ionized molecule is scavenged by the blunt electrode or if it continues off to infinity as far as the system is concerned.

Of course from the standpoint of Patrick's self contained system, the blunt electrode needs to collect the majority of the carriers else things will eventually stop working.

You are right about the efficiencies, absolutely abysmal. I would say Patrick has his work cut out for him.
the purpose of the sharp electrode is to glow and generate ions through homo-nuclear clevage, at as low of a voltage as possible. the purpose of the lower rounded electrode is prevent the generation of counter current which would cancel the upper electrodes contribution.


Alexander wrote ...

It's my understanding that any charge that escapes the blunt electrode creates an equal and opposite impulse on it's journey away from the lifter.

I think you may also have a point about charge buildup on the craft, if this happens it will pull earthwards by electrostatics. Not sure of the magnetude of this effect. Additional lifter segments operating on reverse polarity may help.

This is such a cool project but the numbers I'm getting from web searches look horrendous, 90W lifts 2 ounces. Would it be cheating to make the craft neutrally buoyant first with a helium cell?

As for your efficiency points your absolutely right, the energy efficiency is apalling , but ive got a trick hidden up my sleeve, if im right, IF im right i can make these devices small enough to replace conventional jet engines, but more energy efficent per unit of J/kg of chemical propellent/ energy conversion source.

i have some ideas that need to be demonstrated/validated via my HV oscilloscope probe.... and aerodynamic instruments... hence the 1 year spent building and figuring out the HV probe, and the past 16 years ive been doing the math and physics on the DeSeversky idea.
Back to top
radhoo
Thu Nov 10 2011, 08:10AM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Patrick wrote ...

As for your efficiency points your absolutely right, the energy efficiency is apalling , but ive got a trick hidden up my sleeve, if im right, IF im right i can make these devices small enough to replace conventional jet engines, but more energy efficent per unit of J/kg of chemical propellent/ energy conversion source.
Would be nice to see this working. As we're all skeptical about this idea, I can only encourage you to build the device and prove it is working. Good luck !
Back to top
Scott Fusare
Thu Nov 10 2011, 09:33AM
Scott Fusare Registered Member #531 Joined: Sat Feb 17 2007, 10:51AM
Location: Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 125
Patrick wrote ...

the purpose of the sharp electrode is to glow and generate ions through homo-nuclear clevage, at as low of a voltage as possible. the purpose of the lower rounded electrode is prevent the generation of counter current which would cancel the upper electrodes contribution.


"Homo-nuclear cleavage"? You are referring to dissociation of the diatomic gasses? Electron attachment processes are dominant, lots and lots of info out there on atmospheric ions. Of course, having worked on the math and physics for 16 years, you should already have this worked out wink

Back to top
Patrick
Fri Nov 11 2011, 04:41AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Im creating a ppt. for a demonstration, ill post some things here by means of pdf.
Back to top
Microwatt
Sun Nov 13 2011, 11:39PM
Microwatt Registered Member #3282 Joined: Wed Oct 06 2010, 05:01PM
Location:
Posts: 224
the key to efficiency here is nanosecond pulses
Back to top
Patrick
Tue Nov 15 2011, 12:01AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Microwatt wrote ...

the key to efficiency here is nanosecond pulses

im gettign ready to put onthe metal skirt. not sure what you mean here buy nS pulses.
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.