If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2004
Joined: Sat Feb 28 2009, 11:43PM
Location:
Posts: 39
(I'm reusing this topic to ask about velocity factors. Look a little farther down for the relavant post)
I recently made a double biquad using the instructions from martybugs;
...And I'm not even getting a blip from it. There are at least 30 AP's nearby that my little 5dB omni antenna can see, so I think I must be missing something obvious in the construction. I'm just not sure what.
I've attached some pictures. The only way I've differed from the construction is my use of a 2mm aluminum plate, friction-fit to the copper tubing. The tolerances on the element dimension are accurate down to about 0.25mm, and the wire itself is 1.5mm diameter. I haven't added wire supports yet, but it doesn't wiggle around any.
I haven't taken it wardriving... right now I'm just shooting it randomly out the window. I know biquads don't have a huge field of view but you'd think I'd get a weak signal occasionally.
The network adapter I'm using is an Alfa awus036h, rated for 1watt output.
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Hard to tell in the pictures, but the copper wire going in to the coax center pin isn't touching the pipe is it?
It might also be worth soldering the pipe to the aluminum plate to make sure you've got good contact all the way around. Sometimes the natural oxidation of aluminum can cause conductivity issues.
Also try moving the antenna around, this is a directional antenna so it will perform worse than an omnidirectional antenna if it's not pointed properly, also try changing the orientation because it is polarized.
Registered Member #2004
Joined: Sat Feb 28 2009, 11:43PM
Location:
Posts: 39
It's not touching. Also The parts where the wires cross over aren't touching.
I don't have whatever exotic solder alloy is required to bond aluminum, and it's nearly impossible to solder with normal stuff (I've done it before, but it looks like crap). I can tell it's making good contact since I can just poke it with my MM probes, though.
I've tried changing the polarization, too. It doesn't seem to have any effect.
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Here's a guide to soldering aluminum:
Because of the thermal mass of a copper pipe and aluminum sheet you'll need a lot of heat. A typical soldering iron probably won't cut it, but a soldering gun or a propane torch would do it, maybe a heat gun also. You also need to abrade the surface to remove the oxide. I'd probably apply flux to it after abrading and before soldering as this should help inhibit more oxidation.
If that still doesn't work then there probably are solders specially formulated for aluminum soldering.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Mattski wrote ...
Here's a guide to soldering aluminum:
Because of the thermal mass of a copper pipe and aluminum sheet you'll need a lot of heat. A typical soldering iron probably won't cut it, but a soldering gun or a propane torch would do it, maybe a heat gun also. You also need to abrade the surface to remove the oxide. I'd probably apply flux to it after abrading and before soldering as this should help inhibit more oxidation.
If that still doesn't work then there probably are solders specially formulated for aluminum soldering.
It looks like the process described here uses the Alumiweld type aluminium brazing rods. I've heard these are difficult to use, due to the oxidation problems, and I don't think they will solder aluminium to copper.
While I don't claim to know anything about wifi antennas, I'd try to use a mechanical connection wherever possible between aluminium and copper.
Registered Member #2004
Joined: Sat Feb 28 2009, 11:43PM
Location:
Posts: 39
Are your coax connectors free of shorts?
BAM! Problem solved! Thanks. I knew it was something super simple I was missing. Whoever standardized these rp-sma coax connectors needs to be kicked in the face a few times.
Anyway, now that I've proven to myself it wasn't just the laws of physics trying to screw with me, I think I'll try a big AMOS antenna next. Even if it doesn't get much higher gain, it would still look awesome to have an array of them next to your tv antenna/satellite dish :)
Registered Member #2004
Joined: Sat Feb 28 2009, 11:43PM
Location:
Posts: 39
Bumping this up with a question related to amos antennas;
Basically, I'm not sure how to calculate "velocity factors", which is, as I understand it, the speed the electrons travel through conductors that are within strong electromagnetic influence of each other.
The AMOS design seems pretty simple, but there's one thing I don't like about the plans I'm finding out there. The common practice seems to be using a length of coax cable as the "balun" loop. It looks chunky and ugly, is hard to solder precisely, and looks quite prone to corrosion if it is used outdoors.
I'd like to try making a homemade coaxial balun from copper tubing, but I have no idea what the velocity factor would be for this.
In case anyone knows, here are the exact numbers I'm looking at:
Tubing OD: .25" Tubing ID: .188" Inner wire diam: .06" Insulator: Most likely pvc heatshrink tubing. I could also use teflon tape, which has an unusually high dielectric strength.
Normal velocity factors for coax cables are listed are from 0.66 to 0.83, where "1.0" would equal the speed of light.
Registered Member #56
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
The velocity factor is a little more complicated than that, it is the speed at which a wave propagates down the cable, not the speed that the electrons move (which would be the drift velocity, and is quite slow)
Calculating it is tricky, but for a first approximation you can assume that it is a wave traveling in the dialectric you are using, which would make the velocity factor = c/sqrt(relative dialectic constant) For a closer approximation I would suggest looking for a similar cable and noting the values they measured.
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Fnord wrote ...
I'd like to try making a homemade coaxial balun from copper tubing, but I have no idea what the velocity factor would be for this.
In case anyone knows, here are the exact numbers I'm looking at:
Tubing OD: .25" Tubing ID: .188" Inner wire diam: .06" Insulator: Most likely pvc heatshrink tubing. I could also use teflon tape, which has an unusually high dielectric strength.
Normal velocity factors for coax cables are listed are from 0.66 to 0.83, where "1.0" would equal the speed of light.
Trying to DIY your own coax cable is going to be difficult and expensive. Your first goal is to get a 50 ohm impedance of the cable, otherwise the two halves of your antenna are going to be fed unequal signal powers. You can get this from the following formula for coax based on the ID and OD and the dielectric: . Now if you have a completely filled space between inner and outer conductors with a known dielectric and a consistent spacing between the conductors then that formula will work, and velocity factor is 1/sqrt(epsilon_r) (eps_r being the relative dielectric constant). But if you're doing a hand-built cable it's going to be fairly difficult to get a high quality cable, the spacing will be off, there will be a mix of insulator and air between the conductors, and all of this means that your homemade cable will be reflecting signals back to the source and have an unpredictable velocity factor.
It will be easier, higher performance, and probably cheaper to just buy a coax cable, which should come with velocity factor (or at least dielectric constant or dielectric type) specified.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.