Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

I need an HV fast sqaure wave generator.

 1 2 3 4  last
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Tue Oct 18 2011, 08:21PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Pinky's Brain wrote ...


To reiterate, you need a half bridge ... and trying to build a half bridge out of avalanche transistors seems to me to be a bad idea.
its about 1.1pF, and what devicewould you use then ?
Back to top
teravolt
Wed Oct 19 2011, 07:20PM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
another option would be a reed pulser. If you could find a a high voltage reed relay and swtch it about 1hz with a pullup and some 50ohm cable you could get some fast rise times.

fets also have a transition of 85ns but i fear you probibly would want someting faster
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Oct 20 2011, 01:13AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
teravolt wrote ...

another option would be a reed pulser. If you could find a a high voltage reed relay and swtch it about 1hz with a pullup and some 50ohm cable you could get some fast rise times.

fets also have a transition of 85ns but i fear you probibly would want someting faster
100 nS is fine im still trying to figure out why Pinkys brain says the 2n5551 transistors wont work?
Back to top
Weston
Thu Oct 20 2011, 04:17AM
Weston Registered Member #1316 Joined: Thu Feb 14 2008, 03:35AM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 365
Do you actually need a fast fall time? From what I have seen, most probe calibration is done on the rising edge of a waveform.

I built the circuit referenced to by Mattski. Works acceptably at 100 volts. Has some ringing at higher voltages. Here is a picture of the output waveform into a 50 ohm load.


1319084172 1316 FT126323 Pulser



Yellow is output current 0.5V/A blue is my p6015 1000x probe. I could most likely calibrate the probe with this signal at only 100 volts. If the waveform is not square enough you could possibly use a PFN.

Back to top
Patrick
Thu Oct 20 2011, 04:38AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Weston wrote ...

Do you actually need a fast fall time? From what I have seen, most probe calibration is done on the rising edge of a waveform.

I built the circuit referenced to by Mattski. Works acceptably at 100 volts. Has some ringing at higher voltages. Here is a picture of the output waveform into a 50 ohm load.


1319084172 1316 FT126323 Pulser



Yellow is output current 0.5V/A blue is my p6015 1000x probe. I could most likely calibrate the probe with this signal at only 100 volts. If the waveform is not square enough you could possibly use a PFN.


this is exactly what i need! do you have a schematic? pics?
Back to top
Weston
Thu Oct 20 2011, 05:11AM
Weston Registered Member #1316 Joined: Thu Feb 14 2008, 03:35AM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 365
Its based on the schematic in the paper that Mattski linked to. "Stacking Power Mosfets for use in high speed instrumentation" You wont want to see pics because its a mess on a piece of hand isolation routed copper clad. tongue
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Oct 20 2011, 06:04AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Weston wrote ...

Its based on the schematic in the paper that Mattski linked to. "Stacking Power Mosfets for use in high speed instrumentation" You wont want to see pics because its a mess on a piece of hand isolation routed copper clad. tongue
Ok let me read it again... Yes it looks like my top most schematic... ill build it then, any good fast mosfet HV transistors?
Back to top
Mattski
Thu Oct 20 2011, 06:25AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Patrick wrote ...

teravolt wrote ...

another option would be a reed pulser. If you could find a a high voltage reed relay and swtch it about 1hz with a pullup and some 50ohm cable you could get some fast rise times.

fets also have a transition of 85ns but i fear you probibly would want someting faster
100 nS is fine im still trying to figure out why Pinkys brain says the 2n5551 transistors wont work?
What Pinky's Brain is saying is that if you simply take your circuit that you first posted and use the 2n5551 instead of the MOSFETS you had in there, you could get a fast fall time, but the rise time is still limited by the series resistance charging up the output capacitance of the transistor stack plus the probe capacitance plus whatever parasitic capacitance you have lying around. A half bridge gets around this by using a transistor (stack?) in place of a large value series resistor, so when it turns on it can quickly charge up all those capacitances. I'm not sure if you can use the avalanching trick though to make a half bridge, because it only applies to turning the transistor on quickly, not off quickly.

Then again maybe you only need a fast transistion for one half of your square wave to calibrate your probe, I'm not really sure. And of course you could try calibrating at a lower voltage like teravolt suggests.
Back to top
teravolt
Thu Oct 20 2011, 01:47PM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
are you interested on finding the harmonic response you may have to sweep it. if you had a hundred volt signal generator you can find what frequency it is moast sensitive. it probibly wont have a flat reponse. the advantage about using 100 to 200v is that you can use a standard calibrated probe and set up like a tek 3034 to be shure what you are looking at is real. so with a two chanel scope see if you can look at input vs output and change F and see what happens. I probly could make a fast square wave generator but a method of making shure that your input signal is truely what is at the tip of your probe. what do you think?
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Oct 20 2011, 07:56PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Proud Mary wrote ...

If you Google 2N5551 avalanche pulse you'll at once find a number of papers detailing the use of this very inexpensive HV transistor in simple nanosecond and sub-nanosecond pulse generators with outputs up to 3kV from series strings.

Physical layout is the ultimate determinant of speed in the low nanosecond regime.

There is also a useful application note for the more expensive ZTX415 avalanche transistor giving other fast pulse generator circuits with PFNs which you could use with 2N5551: Link2

Im thinking of using this circuit.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4  last

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.