Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 69
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Question About Coax Cable

Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Wed Jun 29 2011, 01:55AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
jpsmith123 wrote ...

Well in the first example the minimum bend radius is specified as 50mm, and in the product for sale on ebay it's 4 inches (approximately 100 mm); so right there you have a 2:1 difference between the two items which are both called RG213 and look to be physically identical.
I meant that yes your right none of the specs differ, only the bend radius, I would just say buy the smaller bend radius one.
Back to top
Mattski
Wed Jun 29 2011, 05:01AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Since they don't specify how they came up with the number assume the worst which is that it is the mechanical failure specification. The electrical specs may be fine at that bend radius... or they might not be.

You'd probably have to call the seller or buy somewhere else if you want to know for sure. Or buy one and test it yourself.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jun 29 2011, 06:24AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Mattski wrote ...

Since they don't specify how they came up with the number assume the worst which is that it is the mechanical failure specification. The electrical specs may be fine at that bend radius... or they might not be.

You'd probably have to call the seller or buy somewhere else if you want to know for sure. Or buy one and test it yourself.
The seller likely wont know a dam thing, its the maker that he needs to call.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Jun 29 2011, 09:33AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
The RG series began life as cable specifications defined in MIL-HDBK-216.

MIL-HDBK-216 is no more, but the widespread industry acceptance and confidence in the RG specs lead to their continued use as less closely defined 'types.'

The original mil spec might have called for costly silicone rubber sheathing, and PTFE dielectric, while the RG clone may maintain the same general electrical
properties but be made of less costly materials like PVC to meet the needs of the consumer mass market - TV reception, for example.

On the minimum bending radius, coax manufacturer PIC says:

Bending, stretching, and kinks can force the center conductor to one side. This disturbs the common axis of the conductor and shield — they are no longer concentric — and shows up as a change in impedance at the point of "injury." This can actually be seen on a Time Domain Reflectometer (TDR), an instrument which examines cables for signal reflection, appearing as an electrical "bump" (or dip).

The penalty for mishandling comes in increased losses, reflection quirks and impedance mismatches translating to higher VSWR (Voltage Standing Wave Ratio), and instability of other characteristics. Any of these can have a serious effect on overall system performance.
Link2


Back to top
doctor electrons
Wed Jun 29 2011, 09:25PM
doctor electrons Registered Member #2390 Joined: Sat Sept 26 2009, 02:04PM
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 381
Normally when electricians install wire and cable the general rule of thumb is bend radius (max) is
equal to 5 times the diameter of the wire or cable. You can actually look up the specifics in the
national electric code book. Control panels are often designed by engineers keeping the 5x diameter
rule in mind.
Bend radius is simply to protect the shielding or insulation from crinkling up in the inside of a bend and thinning
on the outside of a bend, causing it to be useless.
Also to keep from stretching conductor material (usually copper) to a point that could break it,
or stretch it thinner and decrease ampacity.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.