Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

vacuum diode

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
cedric
Fri Jun 17 2011, 01:37PM Print
cedric Registered Member #2941 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 08:08AM
Location:
Posts: 143
hello!

does anyone here have some knowledge about recovery behavior of thermionic diode?
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Fri Jun 17 2011, 03:49PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
If you mean the "reverse recovery time", I think it's unmeasurably small on vacuum devices.
Back to top
Nah
Fri Jun 17 2011, 05:38PM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
It depends widely on the type of tube. any datasheet will show the max frequency. Most of the time it is the the tens of Megahertz. Some tubes work at around 3.2 gigahertz, like early radar tubes.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jun 17 2011, 07:53PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Thermionic diode valves do not have any reverse recovery time, because they have nothing to recover from - no charge carrier depletion to be made good and explained away to grieving relatives. smile

Diode valves do, of course, have inter-electrode capacitance, which together with the inductance due to the leads, and anode heat capacity, will determine the useful upper frequency limit of the device.
Back to top
Mattski
Fri Jun 17 2011, 08:39PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Proud Mary wrote ...

Thermionic diode valves do not have any reverse recovery time, because they have nothing to recover from - no charge carrier depletion to be made good and explained away to grieving relatives. smile

Diode valves do, of course, have inter-electrode capacitance, which together with the inductance due to the leads, and anode heat capacity, will determine the useful upper frequency limit of the device.

Really? This is just based purely on my conjecture, but I would expect that when you change the polarity of voltage on the thermionic diode then there is a certain change density of electrons accumulated in the space between electrodes, and so they will flow in the opposite direction for a bit while the field is reversed, until they are all swept out of the inter-electrode space.
Back to top
Nah
Sat Jun 18 2011, 02:40PM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
That's what I was thinking too.

I've never seen a RRT on a tube datasheet, I just assumed that the maker used that number and other factors in the Max freq. time. Well, I learn new things every day here!
Back to top
hboy007
Sat Jun 18 2011, 10:12PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
for a rectifier tube running at 1kV, 1mA, 1 cm^2 active region, I ended up with an average carrier concentration of 5*10^6 1/cm^3, which is roughly the intrinsic carrier concentration of GaAs and incredibly small (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). Talking in terms of free electron mobility, I don't think the space charge concentration is an issue (ok, apart from Klystrons and other exotic tubes).

I'm too tired to calculate the time it'll take to deplete the space between A-K but it will be something like the transit time for an electron, like 7.5ns, allowing switching speeds of over 100 MHz. Cheap 1N4148 (trr 4ns) is not impressed wink
Back to top
Nah
Sun Jun 19 2011, 01:33PM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
But there are special tubes that can run at over 3.5 gigahertz.

The hifreq. tubes are usually built in a different maner, and and most of the time smaller in size.

Smaller in size= less capacitance..... = higher frequency
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sun Jun 19 2011, 02:44PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
hboy007 wrote ...

for a rectifier tube running at 1kV, 1mA, 1 cm^2 active region, I ended up with an average carrier concentration of 5*10^6 1/cm^3, which is roughly the intrinsic carrier concentration of GaAs and incredibly small (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). Talking in terms of free electron mobility, I don't think the space charge concentration is an issue (ok, apart from Klystrons and other exotic tubes).

I'm too tired to calculate the time it'll take to deplete the space between A-K but it will be something like the transit time for an electron, like 7.5ns, allowing switching speeds of over 100 MHz. Cheap 1N4148 (trr 4ns) is not impressed wink

Aren't these things simply properties of the interelectrode capacitance due to the vacuum dielectric, which I mentioned above?
Back to top
Mattski
Sun Jun 19 2011, 06:50PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Proud Mary wrote ...
Aren't these things simply properties of the interelectrode capacitance due to the vacuum dielectric, which I mentioned above?

Nope, what I hboy007 and I are talking about is that there are electrons flying between the electrodes when a diode is forward conducting. If the voltage is reversed quickly then those electrons are still there and since there is no recombination mechanism they must be swept in the reverse direction by the reverse voltage to be removed. During this time there should be a reverse current, and the time it takes to sweep those charges away would be the reverse recovery time. You can't treat the vacuum purely as a vacuum dielectric since there are in fact electrons in the dielectric, but capacitance will exist between the electrodes, and I think between the electrodes and space charge.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.