Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 49
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Capper (60)
cereus (73)
Mcanderson (43)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Magnetron cavity formula

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Coronafix
Tue Jun 21 2011, 11:58AM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Are you saying that they are completely different and that the electromagnetic wave will travel differently in a resonant cavity filled with air rather than one evacuated?
I am under the impression that the cavities in the magnetron function in the TE mode to supply the electric field for the electrons to rotate.
Any and all help is greatly appreciated.
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Jun 21 2011, 12:27PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Coronafix wrote ...

Are you saying that they are completely different and that the electromagnetic wave will travel differently in a resonant cavity filled with air rather than one evacuated?

Well, off the top of my head, the wavelength of 2.45GHz radiation is ~12.5 cm in air and ~3 cm in the human body. The figure for a vacuum is different again, but without googling I'm not sure of the exact figure. I assume it is greater than 12.5 cm.

I believe that this is related to the fact that light travels at different speeds depending on the medium (both are EM radiation, or photons)

Coronafix wrote ...


I am under the impression that the cavities in the magnetron function in the TE mode to supply the electric field for the electrons to rotate.
Any and all help is greatly appreciated.

It's the magnetic field that causes the electrons to rotate in the magnetron.

I'm also trying to learn about this subject, the one thing that immediately suggests (to me) that what you propose is incorrect is that, for example, a quarter wavelength waveguide for 2.45 GHZ in air is around 3 cm diameter, whereas a magnetron cavity in a vacuum for 2.45 GHz is around 1.2 cm diameter.

At first glance it wouldn't appear that the formula you found relates to magnetron cavities, but relates instead to waveguide cavities. (the apparatus in the paper certainly resembles a waveguide)

I don't claim to know any more than you do about this subject, that is just my 2 cents' worth.

EDIT: From what we already know from what was posted above, any formula for magnetron cavities would presumably take current and load into account, as well as the other factors.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Jun 21 2011, 02:19PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Coronafix wrote ...

Does anyone know what the formula is to ascertain the operating frequency in a magnetron cavity?
I know that the outer of the anode is the inductive part and the cavity openings create the capacitive part,
but I can't seem to find any design formulas of sizes and geometry vs operating frequency.
Thanks.

You need a cylindrical resonant cavity calculator.

Let's hope this zip file will get you sorted! smile

Link2

But there's always an empirical element - known as tinkering in scientific jargon - to get your theoretical design to resonate at the frequency you want in real life.

Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Jun 21 2011, 02:54PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...


You need a cylindrical resonant cavity calculator.

Let's hope this zip file will get you sorted! smile

Link2

But there's always an empirical element - known as tinkering in scientific jargon - to get your theoretical design to resonate at the frequency you want in real life.



Is the .M file a MATLAB file, PM?

If so, it looks like I'll have to pay $89 to open it.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Jun 21 2011, 03:02PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Ash Small wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...


You need a cylindrical resonant cavity calculator.

Let's hope this zip file will get you sorted! smile

Link2

But there's always an empirical element - known as tinkering in scientific jargon - to get your theoretical design to resonate at the frequency you want in real life.



Is the .M file a MATLAB file, PM?

If so, it looks like I'll have to pay $89 to open it.


Oh dear! But I suppose if you're going to start machining precision cavities in copper stock, $89 will only be the start of your expenses.
Back to top
Coronafix
Tue Jun 21 2011, 10:47PM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Proud Mary wrote ...

You need a cylindrical resonant cavity calculator.

Let's hope this zip file will get you sorted! smile

Link2

But there's always an empirical element - known as tinkering in scientific jargon - to get your theoretical design to resonate at the frequency you want in real life.



I believe that the formula for the cylindrical resonant cavity is in the paper I posted, but it does indeed seem that the space between anode and cathode plays a part in frequency also.
I asked a lecturer about this as well and he told me a story about a WW2 english plane that was shot down and the magnetron removed to back engineer, I think he said it was the the russians. Anyway, they found that the strapping had all kinks in it, and when they copied it they made the strapping straight and hence couldn't get it to work. By kinking it, they were changing the inductance slighty on each sector and hence tuning it. This is the tinkering that is needed, but it pays to start somewhere in a
dimensional sense. I want to thank you Ash and Stella for all the help provided so far.
@ Ash, my mistake, of course the magnetic field provides the rotation, I should have said acceleration or being ac, the velocity modulation. Therefore the field must be perpendicular to the cavity axis or parallel to the opening/throat.
@PM, I also found that zip file but didn't bother as it is a calculator rather than a formula, I like to see what I am working with.
Indeed the copper stock is expensive but the tools to machine i already have.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Jun 21 2011, 11:28PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Coronafix wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...

You need a cylindrical resonant cavity calculator.

Let's hope this zip file will get you sorted! smile

Link2

But there's always an empirical element - known as tinkering in scientific jargon - to get your theoretical design to resonate at the frequency you want in real life.



I believe that the formula for the cylindrical resonant cavity is in the paper I posted, but it does indeed seem that the space between anode and cathode plays a part in frequency also.
I asked a lecturer about this as well and he told me a story about a WW2 english plane that was shot down and the magnetron removed to back engineer, I think he said it was the the russians. Anyway, they found that the strapping had all kinks in it, and when they copied it they made the strapping straight and hence couldn't get it to work. By kinking it, they were changing the inductance slighty on each sector and hence tuning it. This is the tinkering that is needed, but it pays to start somewhere in a
dimensional sense. I want to thank you Ash and Stella for all the help provided so far.
@ Ash, my mistake, of course the magnetic field provides the rotation, I should have said acceleration or being ac, the velocity modulation. Therefore the field must be perpendicular to the cavity axis or parallel to the opening/throat.
@PM, I also found that zip file but didn't bother as it is a calculator rather than a formula, I like to see what I am working with.
Indeed the copper stock is expensive but the tools to machine i already have.


The thing is to make the cavities slightly too small - so that you can lower the frequency of resonance to the desired point by means of a micrometer tuning slug, and alter it once again when you match it into a load, a backwards and forwards empirical process easily mistaken for tinkering. smile
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Jun 21 2011, 11:50PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Proud Mary wrote ...



Oh dear! But I suppose if you're going to start machining precision cavities in copper stock, $89 will only be the start of your expenses.

Coronafix wrote ...

Indeed the copper stock is expensive but the tools to machine i already have.


I also have the equipment to machine it, but most of it is in storage at the moment.
Back to top
mnr
Wed Jun 22 2011, 03:13AM
mnr Registered Member #996 Joined: Sun Sept 09 2007, 06:17PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Ash Small wrote ...

Is the .M file a MATLAB file, PM?

If so, it looks like I'll have to pay $89 to open it.

You can likely run it in Octave with minimal (if any) tweaking.

http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
Back to top
Ash Small
Wed Jun 22 2011, 12:14PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
mnr wrote ...

.
You can likely run it in Octave with minimal (if any) tweaking.

http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/

I'm having problems getting Octave to install. I think I've downloaded the right version. I'm running Windows Vista with Norton, but Norton doesn't seem to be blocking it.
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.