If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Uzzors wrote ...
Using the above formula I got a dose rate of 2,88mGy/hr, or roughly a whole year's dose per hour. The assumptions I used are listed below. Shield attenuation was calculated using tables from The dose rate formula assumes you're standing in the main x-ray beam, unless I'm mistaken.
X-ray tube output fluence (1mm Be)
Target Atomic Number 74 Tube Voltage 50 kV Tube current 4 mA distance 1000 mm
Dose rate 9,92 mGy/sec
Attenuation of Pyrex (5mm, 50kV) 7,41E-001 Attenuation of lead (1mm, 50kV) 1,09E-004
Total dose rate 0,8 µGy/sec 2,88 mGy/hr
Radpro gives a dose rate of 13 mGy/sec with these numbers, compared with the 9.92 mGy/sec using the Glasgow equation, which I don't think to be significant given the very approximate nature of these calculations, and Radpro's inclusion of so-called build-up factor.
But as Anders has said, the 1 mm lead shielding attenuation figure produced by Radpro certainly does look wrong, even allowing for very conservative 'over-shielding.'
Serves me right for using someone's java calculator instead of working it all out in longhand!:-D
Registered Member #95
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
I don't consider those numbers anything other than a worst case scenario to have as a guideline. If I can reduce the calculated radiation levels to an acceptable level using the math above, then I assume my setup will not be worse than that. There's still the issue of other effects like x-ray scatter however. Part of the reason I accept higher than realistic figures is because I can pretend all the "unaccounted for effects" are lumped in with it.
Registered Member #1134
Joined: Tue Nov 20 2007, 04:39PM
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 351
Proud Mary wrote ...
Radpro gives a dose rate of 13 mGy/sec with these numbers, compared with the 9.92 mGy/sec using the Glasgow equation, which I don't think to be significant given the very approximate nature of these calculations, and Radpro's inclusion of so-called build-up factor.
But as Anders has said, the 1 mm lead shielding attenuation figure produced by Radpro certainly does look wrong, even allowing for very conservative 'over-shielding.'
Serves me right for using someone's java calculator instead of working it all out in longhand!:-D
Ultimately Radpro, and even plain Math, will just ballpark your figures.
There are so many variations in tube design that even accurately calculating a tubes output is well nigh impossible, and that is before you factor in ageing and warm up.
Actual measurement is the way to go.
James wrote ...
Below 50kV you are unlikely to get much penetration,
Don't be so sure!
This image was taken at 50kVp:
It demonstrates the effective penetration through steel, you can expect to achieve at 50kVp.
And as Proud Mary says, there is a LOT of exploration to be done at sub 10keV. This is in fact where my work is at now, since everyone seems to have done to death the 50-150keV range!
To the original poster, find a decent sturdy steel box in which to house your tube, and line it with at least 3mm of lead, and operate the tube at no more than 50kV.
Registered Member #3610
Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Or just find an old dental x-ray head and wire up a controller for it. That gives you a nice complete well shielded unit that is relatively safe to use.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.