Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
MicroTesla (34)


Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Low frequency plasma speaker

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
magnet18
Sun May 01 2011, 02:39AM Print
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Hey, I've been thinking about building a setup of two standard plasma speaker arcs (stereo) and then a panel of spikes emitting corona.

My thinking is that since the corona is a lot more area of air that is being moved, it will be better at reproducing the lower frequencies, especially if I put it through a low-pass filter and skip the ultra-sonic base frequency and modulate the corona directly.

Since there will be so much corona (I'm thinking 100 spikes, 10X10), I figured I might have problems powering it all on one flyback, which means paralleling multiple (I see a lot of paralleling in my future). I hope this can be done without them killing each other (doubtful unless I find 10 identical ones) If not then I will parallel them signal-wise and have the outputs each power a separate row of spikes. Or one circle in a bunch of concentric circles of spikes, not sure which yet...

So, does anyone have any thoughts on this? Especially on the idea of it working better for lower frequencies bit and for the bit about powering the spikes?
Please have thoughts...

[EDIT]
If the design didn't make sense I'm currently sketching it up, I'm also downloading autodesk (free and legally!), and I will start using that for stuff soon cheesey
If it ever downloads... 3.3 gig is taking awhile...
Back to top
Inducktion
Sun May 01 2011, 03:01AM
Inducktion Registered Member #3637 Joined: Fri Jan 21 2011, 11:07PM
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1068
magnet18 wrote ...

Hey, I've been thinking about building a setup of two standard plasma speaker arcs (stereo) and then a panel of spikes emitting corona.

My thinking is that since the corona is a lot more area of air that is being moved, it will be better at reproducing the lower frequencies, especially if I put it through a low-pass filter and skip the ultra-sonic base frequency and modulate the corona directly.

Since there will be so much corona (I'm thinking 100 spikes, 10X10), I figured I might have problems powering it all on one flyback, which means paralleling multiple (I see a lot of paralleling in my future). I hope this can be done without them killing each other (doubtful unless I find 10 identical ones) If not then I will parallel them signal-wise and have the outputs each power a separate row of spikes. Or one circle in a bunch of concentric circles of spikes, not sure which yet...

So, does anyone have any thoughts on this? Especially on the idea of it working better for lower frequencies bit and for the bit about powering the spikes?
Please have thoughts...

[EDIT]
If the design didn't make sense I'm currently sketching it up, I'm also downloading autodesk (free and legally!), and I will start using that for stuff soon cheesey
If it ever downloads... 3.3 gig is taking awhile...


It sounds like your going to suffocate on ozone. Corona produces a LOT of ozone so...be careful where you use this.
Back to top
magnet18
Sun May 01 2011, 03:06AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
Inducktion wrote ...

It sounds like your going to suffocate on ozone. Corona produces a LOT of ozone so...be careful where you use this.

Thats why I have the thread going on how to get rid of ozone, I'm thinking a tight woven mesh of copper wire, plated in silver.
Back to top
magnet18
Tue May 03 2011, 08:21PM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
so, no thoughts on the low frequency thing then?
Back to top
Chip Fixes
Tue May 03 2011, 08:33PM
Chip Fixes Registered Member #3781 Joined: Sat Mar 26 2011, 02:25AM
Location:
Posts: 701
you should definitely build it even if it produces to much ozone. Just run it outside in the garage or something, let us know how it goes though!
For powering all the seperate arcs or whatever, you could build several different drivers (each powering a flyback) and parallel them at the audio in, you may need to run the audio source through an amplifier to get it loud enough to hear though.
You can worry about getting rid of ozone later
Back to top
Xray
Wed May 04 2011, 03:47AM
Xray Registered Member #3429 Joined: Sun Nov 21 2010, 02:04AM
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 288
Camp Badger wrote ...

you should definitely build it even if it produces to much ozone. Just run it outside in the garage or something, let us know how it goes though!
For powering all the seperate arcs or whatever, you could build several different drivers (each powering a flyback) and parallel them at the audio in, you may need to run the audio source through an amplifier to get it loud enough to hear though.
You can worry about getting rid of ozone later

How 'bout this for a weird idea: MULTIPLEX the arcs! Here's what I mean..... Let's say that you have an 8 by 8 matrix of plasma arcs, and you want to control them together so that they form one large flat plasma discharge. Well, you can build 64 tesla coils with drivers feeding all 64 discharge points, or (much better) you build only one tesla coil/driver which you feed into a hv switch that "raster scans" the 8X8 matrix. The vertical and horizontal scanning frequencies would have to be high enough so that the scanning is imperceivable by the human ear. And of course, the hv switching system would have to be mechanically and electrically noise-free. I don't know if this is practical or even possible, but it was a fun mind game thinking about it! cheesey
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed May 04 2011, 08:46AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I always fancied the idea of building a big moving message display on that principle. I think ignition coils, one per row/column, would be better than Tesla coils.
Back to top
magnet18
Fri May 06 2011, 01:06AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
I have no idea how one would go about multiplexing kilovolts ultrasonically, let alone without distortion and noise...
It would need to be above 20khz, multiplied by each spike... that's quite some frequency...
Back to top
Xray
Fri May 06 2011, 03:01AM
Xray Registered Member #3429 Joined: Sun Nov 21 2010, 02:04AM
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 288
magnet18 wrote ...

I have no idea how one would go about multiplexing kilovolts ultrasonically, let alone without distortion and noise...
It would need to be above 20khz, multiplied by each spike... that's quite some frequency...

Yes, it would be pretty difficult to do. I actually thought about a possible method which uses 64 shunt regulator tubes (used in older large-screen TV's). The 6BK4 is a high voltage triode that can operate at 30KV plate voltage, but can only handle about 1 or 2 mA at that voltage. My idea is to feed all 64 tubes in parallel (not sure if you should feed the hv into the cathode or the anode) and the opposite electrode (plate or cathode?) of each tube would feed a single arc point. Then you would need a digital sequencer that would turn each tube on, one at a time, in sequence to raster scan the matrix of arc points. This of course would have to be done at a very high frequency, probably in the MHz range. Therefore, the Tesla Coil hv oscillator would have to operate at some microwave frequency. Yeah, it's crazy, but it's only a thought experiment, and not at all practical. Anyone want to give it a try? tongue
Back to top
magnet18
Fri May 06 2011, 03:32AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
If you supply the tubes I'll give it a try!
(seriously, if a bunch of those show up at my doorstep, I will give it a try)
But since these are only flybacks, it sounds like it's going to be a lot easier just to wind a couple windings and put them in parallel... 5-10 flybacks v.s. 64 tubes and a megahertz oscillator and the associated UF-circuitry... which is less work...
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.