Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

120kv 10-20mA SMPS

Move Thread LAN_403
Linas
Sat Aug 20 2011, 07:28PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
I will give another shot for this transformer. I found guy who winds HV transformers, witch is filled with epoxy compound and lot of insulation.
so i have 4cm for insulation from both sides, and will need at least 2cm from core, and everything will be filled with epoxy (13kv/mm breakdown)
also secondary will be insulated from ferrite core, so first turns don't want so badly brake insulation in between core and secondary.
Back to top
Adam Munich
Sat Aug 20 2011, 07:31PM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
How about an E core, with the primary in the center and the out of phase secondaries on the 'legs'?.

It'd give you +60kV and -60kV, but still it'd be a 120kV difference (and it'd make for a more reliable transformer)
Back to top
Linas
Sat Aug 20 2011, 07:37PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
problem is that i also will need to make circuit with 65KV insulation for filament, and that will consume space
and i just have U shape core with 12cm winding space
Back to top
Adam Munich
Sat Aug 20 2011, 07:41PM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
Well then, insulation from the core will not be needed with a single ended supply; just ground one side of the secondary to the core.

Come to think of it, core insulation is not needed with a double ended supply either.
Back to top
Linas
Sat Aug 20 2011, 07:59PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
Grenadier wrote ...

Well then, insulation from the core will not be needed with a single ended supply; just ground one side of the secondary to the core.

Come to think of it, core insulation is not needed with a double ended supply either.
i will use half bridge to drive it.
so i will have time for 0V to core, and other half period whole 120KV in between (since is not flyback topology)
any idea about plexy glass breakdown voltage ?
right now making cdr file for laser cutter for carcase of secondary and primary
Back to top
Adam Munich
Sat Aug 20 2011, 08:09PM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
I don't understand... if your reference point is the core, and one end of the secondary is connected to that point... at one half cycle the HV out will be +, the other half cycle - relative to the core.

MOTs, NSTs, XRTs, and even some flybacks ground their cores. Unless you plan on putting another one of these transformers in series, grounding the core is the wisest thing to do.
Back to top
Linas
Sat Aug 20 2011, 08:35PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
i will keep core as it is. because if i ground it, i will definitely have 120Kv voltages differences.
idea now that my secondary will have same 100KV insulation from core, that should minimize breakdown chance between secondary start and core, also because core will be floating, secondary end also will not be so attracted to strike to core.
but that theory purely for DC
capacitance will give for core some voltage, but i have no idea how it will react and what value will be during peak in secondary
maybe is good idea connect core to middle of secondary, that way, i will have just 65KV differences in all windings
hell, i don't know much about this stuff.
i am open for ideas
Back to top
Adam Munich
Sat Aug 20 2011, 10:27PM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
I'd go for the center tapped transformer. That way you'd only need to insulate 65kV, which is a hell of a lot easier than 120kV
Back to top
Linas
Sun Aug 21 2011, 08:37AM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
last day, i was talking with my friend, and come up with two potential designs:
First: i should make 65KV transformer with grounded start to core (optional) and make 2x multiplier on output. and secondary will be winded as triangle. ( so if i have 120KV and caps are 1nF 80KV, Vdrop @ 20mA ? (50KHz)
Second: make 120KV secondary with triangle shape windings, ground start, and use single diode ( simple flyback)
So if i sue that, and 666pF 120kv on output, with 20mA load Vripple ??

1313918962 1143 FT113887 Untitled


hm, i made calculation by using HV.wiki formula.(65KV transformer +2x multiplier)
so if my transformer is ideal , also i have ideal caps, and diodes ( more or less) i get just 400Vdrop ?
8514b157f6c0e5660c803fe6a98091f8
C is 1nF (80KV) f=50Khz, I=20mA, N=1 ( since i have 2 caps, so N=caps/2)

so is it possible ? because it sound to good to be truth ( and also i have BYV26E diodes for this task )
Back to top
jpsmith123
Tue Aug 23 2011, 02:18AM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Hello Linas, here's the result of a spice simulation of your circuit:


1314065120 1321 FT113887 Circuit


1314065142 1321 FT113887 Voltage


1314065165 1321 FT113887 Current


I think it will be very difficult if not impossible to get 65 kv (peak) out of a "typical" ferrite transformer. You will run into problems with parasitic capacitance and/or capacitive coupling to the core, and insulation problems.

I think you'll probably have to go with a significantly lower transformer voltage and a correspondingly bigger multiplier.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.