Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 32
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

DRSSTC help

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Tue Mar 29 2011, 06:56PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Hello, my friend is having problems with his DRSSTC. The coil data is here, except the measured resonant frequency of secondary is 67 kHz : Link2
The driver is the DRSSTC1 by Steve Ward: Link2
It's a H-bridge of IGBT bricks.
The problem is that with a primary peak current of 200 Amps and tuned primary, he can only get 8 cm sparks to ground and no streamers. The voltage on bridge was 180 Vdc. The primary current looks like this, 100A/div : Link2

I am no expert on DRSSTC's but I think he should be getting much more of a spark with 200 amps. I would be grateful for any help.
Back to top
Luca
Tue Mar 29 2011, 07:08PM
Luca Registered Member #2481 Joined: Mon Nov 23 2009, 03:07PM
Location: ITALY
Posts: 134
From my (modest) experience, I can say:
- coil is ovrecoupled. k should be <0.2 (maybe around 0.15). He should rise the secondary coil by some cm...
- Surge impedance is quite high. He should reduce primary inductance and increase primary capacitance, in order to miantain the same resonant frequency.
- Probably the top load is too big and the secondary resonant frequancy is too low for such coil. He should reduce the dimension of the big topload (and re-tune the primary, obviously)

I have heard that some coil produce very modest sparks up to a certain DC bus voltage and, almost suddenly, soparks strongly increase with bus voltage. He should try to increase the bus voltage up to the maximum (350V?) and see what happen...

Hope that this can help!

Regards

Luca
Back to top
Goodchild
Tue Mar 29 2011, 09:31PM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
I don't think that he is over coupled, you need higher coupling for higher Z. And at his resonant freq I would say that is within limits.

I would say your problem is probably tuning related by looking at the primary current from that scope shot. From the energy in the primary at the end of the burst is just kinda slowly ringing down rather than a quick ring down which indicates that most of the energy is not being transferred to the secondary.

From the sound of it, it looks like you are tuned to low, there are two solution, one crank up the bus voltage to form a streamer and have the streamer C throw the secondary circuit into tune at which point it will make a very large spark very fast. (I think this is what Luca is talking about) Or you could experiment with your tap point and tune it higher and lower to find a good operating point. I would recommend tiring this first before cracking up the bus.

This kinda thing is "almost" always tuning related with this type of coil. Don't be afraid to move your tap point whole turns at a time to get in the general neighborhood then start to fine tune 1/4 or 1/8 turns.

Good luck!
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Wed Mar 30 2011, 05:42AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Dr K -

The JAVATC primary data seems muddled; why are there inputs for both round and ribbon primary conductor?

Herr Zapp
Back to top
Arcstarter
Wed Mar 30 2011, 09:15PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Link2

That was my driver running at around 250 amps peak and i got around 8" sparks to ground when i put the secondary in. When i lowered the voltage from 80v to 40v and the current dropped to around 150a, the spark went from 8 inches to less than an inch... If i would have tried 300-350 amps primary current the sparks would be much longer than 8 inches despite the relatively small current increase.

The output depends on the current in the primary rather than the voltage on the bridge, im guessing said drsstc has an awful lot of primary impedance?
Back to top
Goodchild
Thu Mar 31 2011, 06:05AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Arcstarter wrote ...

Link2

That was my driver running at around 250 amps peak and i got around 8" sparks to ground when i put the secondary in. When i lowered the voltage from 80v to 40v and the current dropped to around 150a, the spark went from 8 inches to less than an inch... If i would have tried 300-350 amps primary current the sparks would be much longer than 8 inches despite the relatively small current increase.

The output depends on the current in the primary rather than the voltage on the bridge, im guessing said drsstc has an awful lot of primary impedance?

This is not entirely true. Yes the spark length is partly depended on the primary current, but another very big factor is how long you drive the primary for during a burst.

If you look at my project thread for my big DR you will notice it's peak primary current is rather low 800apk vs 1500Apk for a comparable system, but! I drive the primary for a much longer time 350uS vs 150uS. This is due to my higher tank impedance making the primary ring up at a slower pace. Although I drive my system different I'm still able to achieve 10+ feet with ease.

QCW and VTTC also take advantage of this type of mode, low peak currents but long burst lengths.

My point is that peak current is only half the story, you have to take into account how long you apply the current for as well. In the end the same amount of energy is still transferred to the secondary.
Back to top
Mathias
Thu Mar 31 2011, 07:59AM
Mathias Registered Member #1381 Joined: Fri Mar 07 2008, 05:24PM
Location: Hungary
Posts: 74
Lately among hobbyists, there is this trend that started, about picking some parameters for example, the primary current vs. spark lenght... Then saying something after a few indefined "home" measurements, not seeing there are way more factors, system specs etc. worth taking into consideration.

Magnetic energy transfer in an air core resonant system isn't that simple... Im not saying that it's entirly wrong to apply some quantitative deduction to the matter. Just that most concepts start to get too simple.
Back to top
Kizmo
Thu Mar 31 2011, 05:00PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Goodchild wrote ...

Arcstarter wrote ...

Link2

That was my driver running at around 250 amps peak and i got around 8" sparks to ground when i put the secondary in. When i lowered the voltage from 80v to 40v and the current dropped to around 150a, the spark went from 8 inches to less than an inch... If i would have tried 300-350 amps primary current the sparks would be much longer than 8 inches despite the relatively small current increase.

The output depends on the current in the primary rather than the voltage on the bridge, im guessing said drsstc has an awful lot of primary impedance?

This is not entirely true. Yes the spark length is partly depended on the primary current, but another very big factor is how long you drive the primary for during a burst.

If you look at my project thread for my big DR you will notice it's peak primary current is rather low 800apk vs 1500Apk for a comparable system, but! I drive the primary for a much longer time 350uS vs 150uS. This is due to my higher tank impedance making the primary ring up at a slower pace. Although I drive my system different I'm still able to achieve 10+ feet with ease.

QCW and VTTC also take advantage of this type of mode, low peak currents but long burst lengths.

My point is that peak current is only half the story, you have to take into account how long you apply the current for as well. In the end the same amount of energy is still transferred to the secondary.



Would the comparison between different coils be more accurate if we look primary RMS current instead of peak current?

RMS current <-> Input power <-> Spark lenght
Back to top
Gregory
Thu Mar 31 2011, 06:38PM
Gregory Registered Member #2922 Joined: Sun Jun 13 2010, 12:08AM
Location:
Posts: 226
No, what they spoke is that the total transfered burst energy isn't only proportional to the current peak, or RMS current. You can get the same total energy with two differential systems:

A: Long time, like 350us and lower current peak. like 800A
B: 120us and 2000A..
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.