Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Bfeigum (35)


Next birthdays
07/11 Bfeigum (35)
07/12 genious 7 (32)
07/13 Friday (55)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Basic Magnetron Question

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
James
Tue Mar 29 2011, 11:24PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
That's a good point. Honestly I've never played with a magnetron outside of a microwave oven so I can't say how they behave under different conditions. Most microwaves do cycle them off and on at a fairly slow rate to control power. This is the easiest way because one transformer provides both filament and HV, and a simple relay is all it takes. "Inverter" microwaves I assume use PWM to vary the power level, but I suppose it just pulses at a high rate without altering the peak.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Mar 30 2011, 09:02AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Ash: From an electrical point of view a magnetron looks like a zener diode. It hardly conducts at all until the voltage gets high enough to overcome the electron-bending effect of the magnetic field, then it springs into life all of a sudden: a small increase in voltage causes a large increase in current and RF power. Too much voltage and it goes crazy, for essentially the same reason that a recorder or tin whistle shrieks horribly if you blow it too hard.

Varying the current is the easiest way to go. But because all practical HV power supplies have a fairly high output impedance (that's what those shunts in the MOT are for) varying the voltage amounts to pretty much the same thing.

It's a common newbie fallacy to believe that you can control voltage and current independently. You can only control one of them: the load decides the other. When the load is a resistor, the rule that it uses to decide is Ohm's Law.
Back to top
Ash Small
Wed Mar 30 2011, 04:27PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve McConner wrote ...

Ash: From an electrical point of view a magnetron looks like a zener diode. It hardly conducts at all until the voltage gets high enough to overcome the electron-bending effect of the magnetic field, then it springs into life all of a sudden:


Yes, I'd assumed that was the case, but you explained it better than I did.

Steve McConner wrote ...



a small increase in voltage causes a large increase in current and RF power. Too much voltage and it goes crazy, for essentially the same reason that a recorder or tin whistle shrieks horribly if you blow it too hard.

Varying the current is the easiest way to go. But because all practical HV power supplies have a fairly high output impedance (that's what those shunts in the MOT are for) varying the voltage amounts to pretty much the same thing.


Would a 250 watt variac be suitable for this? or would I risk burning it out even if I put a smaller capacitor on the output of the secondary? (I'm not that familiar with variacs and I only have one, so I don't really want to learn the hard way)

Steve McConner wrote ...



It's a common newbie fallacy to believe that you can control voltage and current independently. You can only control one of them: the load decides the other. When the load is a resistor, the rule that it uses to decide is Ohm's Law.

As I understand it, using a smaller capacitor in the doubler will reduce the maximum current (same theory as Cockroft Walton multipliers), however, especially if using a smoothing cap, if the load wants to draw more current than is available, this will result in 'voltage sag', presumably, this will find a point of equilibrium, as the voltage will rise until current flows. I can see that this will be a bit of a balancing act, though.

EDIT: I think the issue here is basically whether or not I'm correct in assuming that a smaller capacitor in the doubler will effectively 'throttle' the system? (when used in conjunction with a variac on the primary of the transformer)
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Mar 30 2011, 07:04PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, yes, it will "throttle" it.

A variac is just a load of wire. It can be protected by a fuse in series with the sliding contact. Even a slow-blow type will blow before the variac burns. The fuse rating should just be the variac current rating: they're rated in amps, not watts.

You are right with the thing about sag and a point of equilibrium. It's only a fiddly balancing act if you're trying to calculate this operating point or visualise where it might be. The actual circuit always finds the point effortlessly if it exists. If no stable operating point exists, the circuit is an oscillator.
Back to top
Ash Small
Thu Mar 31 2011, 03:34PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve McConner wrote ...

Well, yes, it will "throttle" it.

A variac is just a load of wire. It can be protected by a fuse in series with the sliding contact. Even a slow-blow type will blow before the variac burns. The fuse rating should just be the variac current rating: they're rated in amps, not watts.

You are, as usual, correct, Steve. 240V, 50/400Hz, 2A. I picked it up to throttle a 250 watt diffusion pump, in conjuction with an MKS butterfly valved pressure control system, that's why I had the figure of 250 watts in my head. With a 2 amp fuse between the output from the variac (not the common terminal) and the MOT will this be suitable?

Steve McConner wrote ...


You are right with the thing about sag and a point of equilibrium. It's only a fiddly balancing act if you're trying to calculate this operating point or visualise where it might be. The actual circuit always finds the point effortlessly if it exists. If no stable operating point exists, the circuit is an oscillator.

I meant it's a 'balancing act' to get the point of equilibrium at the optimum point, for optimum results, ie to adjust the point of equilibrium to where you want it for optimum results. any oscillation will presumably be due to a 'too small' smoothing capacitor.
Back to top
Ash Small
Wed Apr 06 2011, 04:58PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Another paper on the subject of microwave ion sources here, with quite a lot of info (59 pages):

Link2
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.