If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2919
Joined: Fri Jun 11 2010, 06:30PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 652
Why would you want to do that? A CO2 laser small enough to hold would be of no military use - it would be good for at most burning enemy corneas, not killing them, and conventional firearms are a much better way of winning battles. Lasers are primarily being considered as anti-aircraft/missile weapons. If you want a Class IV laser as a toy, forget it. CO2 lasers are dangerous enough in a controlled environment - the last thing we want are 20W+ lasers being used irresponsibly by people who don't understand the dangers of such a device. 1W handhelds are bad enough... There are so many things that are stupid about a handheld CO2, not the least of which are the fire hazard and the eye hazards from scattered light (don't tell me that CO2's are "safe" because the light can't reach your retina...i bet you wouldn't like toasted corneas either!). Sorry for the rant...i have this thing about responsible laser use (i.e. not by Jedi wannabes!).
Registered Member #2628
Joined: Fri Jan 15 2010, 12:23AM
Location:
Posts: 627
Most powerfull Ive got in a handheld myself is 2W, but I usually stick to <1.5W as a limit for good lifespan.
It just goes to show you how fast technology is progressing. I made this thing pretty recently. A few years ago the most powerfull laser ive seen was a multi-watt argon ion, and that thing was a huge beast that also doubled as a space heater from the amount of power it was wasting as heat. Now you can get half of that power in a handheld device, and powered by a 3.7V 2800mAh battery rather then an industrial power outlet. These direct injection diodes will only get more powerfull and more compact in the future too.
If your already looking into cramming as much power of IR as you can without resorting to tubes, I would use fibercoupled 808nm bar diodes. They will easly achive and surpass powers CO2 lasers are capable off, at a far better efficiency and alot more compact. (although this speaks nothing of the power source for these fibercoupled beast )
The only bad thing is.. they have very terrible beam specs IMO. I only see any use in them in some very up close cutting (A CNC maybe?) or as a pump for an ND:YAG. Right now a good bar will probably cost a little more then a CO2 tube, and sadly will only get more expensive from that point on as you go up in power. This is surplus cost though, brand new im sure its worth a decent chunk of money.
Registered Member #2919
Joined: Fri Jun 11 2010, 06:30PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 652
"very terrible" is an understatement...even FC bars have a beam divergence of something like 200 mrad, and the non-FC ones have a 40x10 degree highly astigmatic 1 cm line instead of a beam. The direct injection diodes have pretty atrocious beam quality too. There's an Ebay seller selling a few hundred watts of diode bars for $199, should anyone ever be tempted to make a 100W class greenie
Registered Member #89
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Hi guys - now to get a bit of constructive talk about particle beam weapons.
Somewhere I've read that beta radiation has range in air of about 3.5 meters/MeV. If it was truly linear like that then a 50GeV beam could be destructive at many kilometers with enough input power.
One other dubious rumor I've also heard is that electrons will not disperse in air (at least not as fast as vacuum) due to "neutralization" by positive charges around them. Not sure what it means, but the only thing I could think of that could prevent beam from spreading would be Z pinch (large current would be required for this).
Still this makes possibility of building such weapons seem much more practical than I believe they are. Since I've seen pictures of electron beams from cyclotrons spreading up in matter of inches. I also don't see why would electron range grow linearly with energy, more energetic electrons should lose more energy in collisions (relativistic effects?).
Now I tempt you to discuss why this would fail after all!
Registered Member #193
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
CokeCanNinja wrote ...
I had an idea for a gun that would spray a really good conducting fluid attached to a high voltage generator such as a Tesla coil. The electrical energy from the generator would travel through the fluid and electrocute whatever you hit. The range wouldn't be all that great, but it would work well for taking out groups of enemy's.
It would be easier, cheaper and more effective to spray gasoline, then set fire to it. It would also be more difficult to shield against it.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.