Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 63
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Cu2O p-channel jFET (MESFET) or: what Lilienfeld did not manage to build

Move Thread LAN_403
hboy007
Tue Feb 22 2011, 02:48PM Print
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
I just found a paper about dual gate mosfets that includes a brief historical summary about the MOSFET. It is being said that the first patent to mention a mosfet-like structure war handed in by Julius Edgar Lilienfeld back in 1925.
This gentleman did some experiments with Cu-Cu2O Schottky junctions. Hole mobility is half that of p-Si, hole density is about 10^15 cm²/Vs but it can be increased by 2 orders of magnitude by adding Si as dopant. Since the maximum current density is quite low and the majority carrier mobility is a pain, no one (to my knowledge) has bothered experimenting with FET structures of this material.

Ohmic contacts can be formed through lead or gold metallization, copper forms Schottky barriers. I hope I got the lattice orientation of the bulk right, since copper(I)oxide has good properties when grown in a (111) layer and crystalizes in a cubic system. See Link2 for nice illustrations. Please correct me if I got it wrong.

When the oxide semiconductor layer is made thin enough, the barrier could be made to significantly limit the remaining channel width. Positive gate voltages will then pinch off the channel. Since copper oxide is quite forgiving in regard to current spikes this might be the first jFET structure that is forgiving to electrostatic discharges smile

Now tell me, might this device by any chance work as a jFET?

1298386135 1667 FT0 Cu2o Jfet

Depletion zones are coloured yellow.
Back to top
Mattski
Tue Feb 22 2011, 06:06PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Assuming Cu-Cu2O does indeed form schottky junctions then it looks basically like a textbook JFET. In order to ensure that current does not flow from the channel to the bulk Cu(111) layer I think you'll need to bias the bulk at the drain voltage to ensure there is a depletion region, if the Cu2O is p-type. Conversely with an n-type channel you would bias the channel at the source voltage (presumably "ground") to ensure the channel-bulk junction is always reverse biased.

Edit: See Link2 for some homebrew Cu2O detectors, and Link2 for some research.
Back to top
hboy007
Tue Feb 22 2011, 10:47PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 374
Thank you for the links, they help very much. Cu2O and CuO both seem to be intrinsic p-type semiconductors due to copper vacancies but at least Cu2O can be made into an n-type material by changing the pH during electrochemical deposition. active structures such as the jFET suggested above might be within reach of any amateur experimenter, even if the gate needs to be created by continued deposition with a different pH level after masking out windows, thus creating a p-n junction.

Edit: just found this brief summary of "buried physics" formulas to guess some specs of the proposed device: Link2

And here are some scarce papers I found on Cu2O TFTs:
Link2 epitaxial (110) Cu2O films on (110) MgO substrate, field effect mobility ∼0.04 cm²(Vs)^−1
Link2 Cu2O films on (110) MgO substrate ∼ 0.26 cm² (Vs)^−1
Link2 Copper oxide (CuxO) thin films on SiO2/Si substrate, Hafnium oxynitride dielectric used for MOSFET, on-off current ratio of 3 x 10^6, a saturation mobility - 4.3 cm²/ V s

as MOSFET structures are possible, MESFET structures should be, too. I wonder how hard it will be to construct a device with low-tech methods.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.